Sweat and Tears: Working at Redemption

  • Jayne Raisborough
Chapter

Abstract

The fat sensibility speaks to varied, yet patterned representations that attend to the cultural knowingness of the fat body. This book argues that there are two mutually supporting forms of fat stigma: hostility and benevolence. The last chapter started to unpack some of the ways ‘hostile’ representations present the fat body as abject through multiple failings of self-control. This chapter suggests that makeovers cannot proceed without an escape from the abject and that this is achieved by a narrative shift to benevolent representations. I explore how benevolence increases as a particularly defined personhood materializes in place of the fat body as the foci of concern in the show. I frame this discussion of makeovers, with particular attention to Fat: A Year to Save My Life (broadcast in 2013), through Kenneth Burke’s (1954) cycle of redemption. Burke offers a useful frame as he allows a continuity of this book’s concern with prevailing social values and norms. More specifically, social values are at the fore of his argument that guilt and shame are socially produced and are followed by social rituals of purification and redemption. I argue that the makeover enlivens and dramatizes these rituals. For Burke, however, guilt and redemption are in an endless, ongoing cycle, and I question what this means for our reading of new subjectivity modelled in the final ‘reveal’.

Keywords

Emotional Eating Boot Camp Multiple Failing Moral Economy Cultural Imperative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen, K., and H. Mendick. 2012. “Keeping it Real: Social Class Young People and Authenticity in Reality TV”. Sociology 47(3): 460–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bratich, J. 2006. “Nothing Is Left Alone for Too Long: Reality Programming and Control Society Subjects”. Journal of Communication Inquiry 30: 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burke, K. 1954. Permanence and change: An anatomy of Purpose. Los Altos, CA: Hermes.Google Scholar
  4. Burke, K. 1970. The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cormack, H.J. 2014. “A Cycle of Redemption in a Medical Error Disclosure”. Qualitative Health Research 24(6): 860–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. French, S., and S. Brown. 2011. “It’s All Your Fault: Kenneth Burke, Symbolic Action and the Assigning of Guilt and Blame to Women”. Southern Communication Journal 76(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Furedi, F. 2004. Therapy Culture: Cultivating Vulnerability in an Uncertain Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Glick, P., and S. Fiske. 2001. “An Ambivalent Alliance: Hostile and Benevolent Sexism as Complementary Justifications”. American Psychologist 56(2): 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodley, D., R. Lawthom, and K. Runswick-Cole. 2014. “Disability and Austerity: Beyond Work and Slow Death”. Disability and Society 29(6): 980–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hazelden, R. 2003. “Love Yourself: The Relationship of the Self with Itself”. Journal of Sociology 39: 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Inthorn, S., and T. Boyce. 2010. ““It’s Disgusting How Much Salt You Eat!”: Television Discourses of Obesity, Health and Morality”. International Journal of Cultural Studies 13(1): 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klos, L.A., C. Greenleaf, N. Paly, M.M. Kellser, C.G. Shoemaker, and E.A. Suchla. 2015. “Losing Weight on Reality TV: A Content Analysis of the Weight Loss Behaviours and Practices Portrayed on The Biggest Loser”. Journal of Health Communication 20: 639–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lavelle, K. (2015). ‘No Room for Racism: Restoration of Order in the NBA’. Communication and Sport. Published Online 5 May 2015, 1–18.Google Scholar
  14. Levy-Navarro, E. 2012. “I’m the New Me: Compelled Confession in Diet Discourse”. Journal of Popular Culture 45(2): 340–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lustig, R.H. 2014. Fat Chance: The Hidden Truth About Sugar, Obesity and Disease. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  16. Raisborough, J. 2014. “Why We Should Be Watching More Trash TV: Exploring the Value of an Analysis of the Makeover Show to Fat Studies Scholars”. Fat Studies 3(2): 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ringrose, J., and V. Walkerdine. 2008. “Regulating the Abject: The TV Make-Over as Site of Neoliberal Reinvention Toward Bourgeois Femininity”. Feminist Media Studies 8(3): 227–46. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/13/6/2.html CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rose, N. 1999. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  19. Spoel, P., R. Harris, and F. Henwood. 2012. “The moralization of Healthy Living: Burke’s Rhetoric of Rebirth and Older Adults’ Accounts of Healthy Eating”. Health 16(6): 619–635.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jayne Raisborough
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Applied Social ScienceUniversity of BrightonBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations