The Hidden Aesthetic of English Teaching

  • Ben Knights
Chapter

Abstract

The first part of this chapter continues the exploration of the invisible pedagogy of the subject. Traditionally, students have been expected not only to recapitulate for themselves the threshold concepts shared by their teachers, but also to perform in their own written or spoken work the linguistic vivacity and density of the source texts. The practice of the subject therefore comes into collision with ‘efferent’ assumptions about mining text for propositional meaning. Even where the subject is scholarship-based, it has still tended to re-enact its own subject matter in aesthetically satisfying ways. The second half of the chapter investigates another and complementary aspect of the hidden aesthetic: while the subject has a complicated relationship to English nationalism, it is (and despite its cosmopolitan modernist legacies) nevertheless haunted by collective memories of forms of rural and small-town Englishness. These are seen as carrying on an influential half-life in the margins of the subject.

Keywords

Cultural Capital Literary Criticism Creative Writing Methodological Pluralism Educational Subject 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Bate, Jonathan. The Song of the Earth. Basingstoke: Macmillan. 2000.Google Scholar
  2. Bruce, Susan, Ken Jones, and Monica McLean. ‘Some Notes on a Project: Democracy and Authority in the Production of a Discipline’. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching, Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture. 7(3). 2007: 481–500.Google Scholar
  3. Collini, Stefan. ‘The Chatto list: Publishing Literary Criticism in Mid-twentieth-Century Britain’. Review of English Studies. 63(261). 2012: 634–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Day, Gary. Re-reading Leavis: ‘Culture’ and Literary Criticism. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 1996.Google Scholar
  5. Ebbatson, Roger. An Imaginary England: Nation, Landscape and Literature 1840–1920. Aldershot: Ashgate. 2005.Google Scholar
  6. Eliot, T.S. The Use of Poetry and the Use of Criticism: Studies in the Relation of Criticism to Poetry in England. London: Faber. 1933.Google Scholar
  7. Gildea, Niall, Helena Goodwyn, Megan Kitching, and Helen Tyson, (eds). English Studies: The State of the Discipline, Past, Present, and Future. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 2015.Google Scholar
  8. Hodgson, John. The Experience of Studying English in UK Higher Education. English Subject Centre, Report Series No. 20. 2010.Google Scholar
  9. Kermode, Frank.The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1967.Google Scholar
  10. Leavis, F.R. How to Teach Reading: A Primer for Ezra Pound. Cambridge: Minority Press. 1932.Google Scholar
  11. Leavis, F.R., and Denys Thompson. Culture and Environment: The Training of Critical Awareness. London: Chatto and Windus. 1933.Google Scholar
  12. Levine, Caroline. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morton, H.V. The Call of England. [1928]. London: Methuen. Fifth edition 1930.Google Scholar
  14. [Newbolt, Henry] The Teaching of English in England. Being the Report of the Departmental Committee Appointed by the President of the Board of Education to Inquire into the Position of English in the Educational System of England. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office. 1921, 1924.Google Scholar
  15. Priestley, J.B. English Journey: Being a Rambling but Truthful Account of What One Man Saw and Heard and Thought During a Journey Through England During the Autumn of the Year 1933. London: Heinemann. 1934.Google Scholar
  16. Riding, Laura, and Robert Graves. A Survey of Modernist Poetry. London: William Heinemann. 1927.Google Scholar
  17. Sampson, George. (ed. Denys Thompson) English for the English: A Chapter on National Education. [1921]. Cambridge Texts and Studies in the History of Education Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1970.Google Scholar
  18. Samuel, Raphael. Theatres of Memory, Vol. 1. Past and Present in Contemporary Culture. London: Verso. 1994.Google Scholar
  19. ———. Theatres of Memory, Vol. 2. Island Stories: Unravelling Britain. London: Verso. 1998.Google Scholar
  20. Sell, Roger D. Communicational Criticism: Studies in Literature as Dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thacker, Andrew. Moving through Modernity: Space and Geography in Modernism. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 2003.Google Scholar
  22. Thompson, Denys. ‘A Cure for Amnesia’. Scrutiny. 2(1). 1933: 2–11.Google Scholar
  23. Vescio, Bryan. Reconstructing Literary Studies: An Informalist Approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2014.Google Scholar
  24. Wilder, Laura. ‘“Get Comfortable With Uncertainty”: A Study of the Conventional Values of Literary Analysis in an Undergraduate Literature Course’. Written Communication. 19. (January 2002): 175–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ———. Rhetorical Strategies and Genre Conventions in Literary Studies: Teaching and Writing in the Disciplines. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 2012.Google Scholar
  26. Yelland, Cris. ‘A Genre and Move Analysis of Written Feedback in Higher Education’. Language and Literature, 20(3), 2011: 218–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ben Knights
    • 1
  1. 1.Teesside UniversityMiddlesbroughUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations