Abstract
In the last few decades, increasing attention has been given to studies of naturally occurring business interaction, both by practitioners and academics, and interest has been raised towards approaches focused on the actual use of language “as it happens”, using real-time observational data. My study belongs to this tradition and looks at spontaneous talk by sellers and clients when they visit each other or in the context of exhibitions. In particular, I focus on a practice which, to the best of my knowledge, has not been described in the literature, and that has to do with sellers performing enquiry into the clients’ doings, in the course of informal chat. I have called this practice “testing the waters”. In brief, topics are raised in conversation with clients and assessed in ways as to create clients’ convergence on the sellers’ business policy. This is done through two main courses of action, the first is supporting clients’ actions which are found to be in line with the sellers’ policy, the second is re-orienting the clients’ actions towards the sellers’ goals and expectations. What is interesting is that both courses of actions occur in informal, friendly chat, but still seem to be strategically constructed with a clear business aim. “Testing the waters” seems thus to be achieved as an important institutional practice: looking at how it is constructed may suggest to sellers and clients ways to learn, improve or make the best out of it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Antaki, C., Hanneke, H.S. & Rapley, M. (2000). Brilliant. Next question…″: High-grade assessment sequences in the completion of interactional units. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33 (3): 235–262.
Button, G. & Casey, N. (1984). Generating the topic: the use of topic initial elicitors. In Atkinson, J.M. & Heritage, J. (Eds), Structures in Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 167–190.
Clark, C., Drew, P. & Pinch, T. (2003). Managing prospect affiliation and rapport in real-life sales encounters. Discourse Studies 5 (1): 5–31.
Goodwin, C. & Goodwin, M.H. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1, 1–54.
Goodwin, C. & Goodwin, M.H. (1992). Assessments and the construction of context. In Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (Eds), Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 147–190.
Jefferson, G. (1978). Explanation of transcript notation. In Schenkein, J. (Ed), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press. xi-xvi.
Jones, C.M. (1997). “That’s good sign”: Encouraging assessments as form of social support in medically related encounters. Health Communication 9(2): 119–153.
Jones, C.M. (2001). Missing assessments: Lay and professional orientations in medical interviews. Text 21 (1/2): 113–150.
Heritage, J. (2002). Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement. In Ford, C., Fox, B. & Thompson, S. (Eds), The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 196–224.
Heritage, J. (2012a). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29.
Heritage, J. (2012b). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and Territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52.
Heritage, J. & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk in interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38.
Heritage, J. & Raymond, G. (2012). Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions. In de Ruiter, J.P. (Ed), Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 179–192.
Holt, E. (1993). The structure of death announcements: Looking on the bright side of death. Text 13 (2): 189–212.
Lindström, A. & Heinemann, T. (2009). Good enough: Low-grade assessments in caregiving situations. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (4): 309–328.
Lindström, A. & Mondada, L. (2009). Assessments in social interaction: Introduction to the special issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (4): 299–308.
Mondada, L. (2009). The embodied and negotiated production of assessments in instructed actions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (4): 329–361.
Piirainen-Mars, A. & Jauni, H. (2012). Assessments and the social construction of expertise in political TV interviews. Text & Talk 32 (5): 637–660.
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Atkinson, J., Maxwell, J. & Heritage, J. (Eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 57–101.
Psathas, G. & Anderson, T. (1990). The practices of transcription in conversation analysis. Semiotica 78 (1/2): 75–99
Schegloff, E.A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction- A Primer in Conversation Analysis–Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Svennevig, J. (2004). Other-repetition as display of hearing, understanding and emotional stance. Discourse Studies. 6 (4): 489–516
Stivers, T. (2004). “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research 30(2): 260–293
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 Chiara Ganapini
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ganapini, C. (2016). Evaluating Topical Talk in Interactional Business Settings: When “Testing the Waters” with Customers May Not Be Much of a Gamble. In: Alessi, G.M., Jacobs, G. (eds) The Ins and Outs of Business and Professional Discourse Research. Communicating in Professions and Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137507686_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137507686_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50767-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50768-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)