Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bisexuality

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of the Psychology of Sexuality and Gender

Abstract

The term ‘bisexual’ is generally used in minority Western cultures to refer to an individual who experiences sexual attraction to more than one gender - or whose attractions are based on characteristics other than gender (e.g. build or eye colour). As we will show in this chapter, psychology is deeply implicated in the construction of current cultural understandings of bisexuality. Within these understandings, gender and sexuality are most commonly conceptualised as entirely dichotomous: ‘man’ and ‘woman’ and ‘homosexual’ and ‘heterosexual’ are understood to be distinct from, and opposite to, each other. Bisexuality has been particularly problematic for researchers and academics because they have found it challenging to make bisexuality fit this model of sexuality, which has its roots in the work of early sexologists and has since gained scientific and cultural currency (Angelides, 2001; Fire stein, 1996; Storr, 1999). Consequently, bisexuality has often been invalidated or simply overlooked by sexologists, psychologists, and social scientists more widely. In this chapter we outline a brief history of how bisexuality has been conceptualised within psychology and the social sciences before turning to more recent research, issues, and debates. We end with recommendations for future directions for research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • Angelides, S. (2001). A history of bisexuality.Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M., Richards, C., Jones, R., Bowes-Catton, H., and Plowman, T., The Open University. (2012a). The bisexuality report: Bisexual inclusion in LGBT equality and diversity.Milton Ke5m.es: The Open University Centre for Citizenship, Identities and Governance.Journal of Bisexuality(Taylor & Francis, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, L. (2010). Counselling ideologies: queer challenges to heteronormativity.Aldershot: Ash gate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, C. & Barker, M. (2013). Sexuality and gender for mental health professionals: A practical guide.London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Rust, P. (Ed.) (2000b). Bisexuality in the United States: A social science reader.New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • American Institute of Bisexuality (2012). Controversy over Professor J. Michael Bailey and the existence of bisexuality.Retrieved from http://bisexual.org/BiBrain/ [Accessed 13 January 015].

  • Angelides, S. (2001). A history of bisexuality.London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ault, A. (1996). Ambiguous identity in an unambiguous sex/gender structure: The case of bisexual women. Sociological Quarterly, 37(3), 449–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M. (2004). Including the B-word: Reflections on the place of bisexuality within lesbian and gay activism and psychology. Lesbian& Gay Psychology Review, 5(3), 118–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M. (2007). Heteronormativity and the exclusion of bisexuality in psychology. In V. Clarke & E. Peel (Eds.) Out in psychology: Lesbian, gay bisexual, trans and queer perspectives, (pp. 95–117). Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M., Bowes-Catton, H., Iantaffi, A., Cassidy A., & Brewer, L. (2008). British bisexuality: A snapshot of bisexual identities in the United Kingdom. Journal of Bisexuality, 8(1), 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M., Richards, C., Jones, R., Bowes-Catton, H., and Plowman, T., The Open University. (2012a). The bisexuality report: Bisexual inclusion in LGBT equality and diversity.Milton Ke5TT.es: The Open University Centre for Citizenship, Identities and Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M., Yockney J., Richards, C., Jones, R. L., Bowes-Catton, H., & Plowman, T. (2012b). Guidelines for researching and writing about bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 22(3), 376–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. P., Weinberg, M. S., & Hammersmith, S. K. (1981). Sexual preference: Its development in men and women.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenson, C. (2002). What’s in a name? Bisexual women define their terms. In D. Atkins (Ed.) Bisexual women in the twenty-first century, (pp. 9–21). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bi Academic Intervention (Eds.) (1997). The bisexual imaginary: Representation, identity and desire.London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, P. & Schwartz, P. (1976). Bisexuality: Some social psychological issues.New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bode, J. (1976). View from another closet: Exploring bisexuality in women.New York: Hawthorn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J., Gurevich, M., & Mathieson, C. (2002). (Con)tested identities: Bisexual women reorient sexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 2(2/3), 23–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowes-Catton, H. (2007). Resisting the binary: Discourses of identity and diversity in bisexual politics 1988–1996. Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review, 8(1), 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowes-Catton, H., Barker, M., & Richards, C. (2011). ‘I didn’t know I could feel this relaxed in my body’: Using visual methods to research bisexual people’s embodied experiences of identity and space. In P. Reavey (Ed.) Visual psychologies: Using and interpreting images in qualitative research, (pp. 255–270). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. & Hegarty, P. (2007). Who was Magnus Hirschfeld and why do we need to know? History and Philosophy of Psychology, 9(1), 12–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, V. L. (1994). Science in the bedroom: A history of sex research.New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, V. L. (2004). Sex will never be the same: The contributions of Alfred C. Kinsey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(3), 277–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, B. (5 July 2005). Straight, gay or lying?: Bisexuality revisited. New York Times.Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2005/0 7/05/health/05 sex.html ?pagewant ed=all&_r=0. [Accessed 13 January 2015].

  • Cass, V. C. (1979). Homosexual identity formation: A theoretical model. Journal of Homosexuality, 4(3), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cory, D. W. & LeRoy, J. P. (1963). The homosexual and his society.New York: Citadel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, D. (1996). Pink therapy: A guide for counsellors and therapists working with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients.Milton Ke5TT.es: Open Univers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (1998). Development of sexual orientation among adolescents and 5’oung adult women. Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 1085–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2008). Female bisexual from adolescence to adulthood: Results from a 10-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, S (2013). Bi: Notes for a bisexual revolution.Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliason, M.J. (1997). The prevalence and nature of biphobia in heterosexual undergraduate students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26(3), 317–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericksen, J. A. & Steffen, S. A. (1999). Kiss and tell: Surveying sex in the twentieth century.London: Harvard Univers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairyington, S. (2008). Kinsey, bisexuality, and the case against dualism. Journal of Bisexuality, 8(3/4), 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1905/1962). Three essays on the theory of sexuality.Translated by James Strachey. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestein, B. (Ed.) (1996). Bisexuality: The psychology and politics of an invisible minority.London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestein, B. A. (Ed.) (2007). Becoming visible: Counseling bisexuals across the lifespan.New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction.Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. (1995). Bisexual identities. In A. R. D’Augelli & C.J. Patterson (Eds.) Lesbian, gay and bisexual identities over the lifespan, (pp. 48–86). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, C. E. & A. Evans (1985). Bisexuality reconsidered: An idea in pursuit of a definition. Journal of Homosexuality, 11(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havelock Ellis, H. (1897/2004). Studies in the Psychology of Sex, Volume 2: Sexual Inversion.http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/13611 [accessed 13/01/2014].

  • Hayfield, N. (2011). Bisexual women’s visual identities: A feminist mixed methods exploration(Unpublished doctoral thesis). Bristol: University of the West of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Halliwell, E. (2014). Bisexual women’s understandings of social marginalisation: ‘The heterosexuals don’t understand us but nor do the lesbians’. Feminism & Psychology 24(3), 352–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., Halliwell, E., & Maison, H. (2013). Visible lesbians and invisible bisexuals: Appearance and visual identities among bisexual women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 40, 172–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, C. (1998). Waiting for no man: Bisexual femme subjectivity and cultural repudiation. In S. Munt (Ed.) Butch/femme: Inside lesbian gender.(pp. 90–100). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld, M. (1914). Die homosexualität des Mannes und des Weibes.Berlin: Louis Marcus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld, M. (2000). Homosexuality in Men and Women.Translated by Michael A. Lombardi-Nash. New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highleyman, L. (1995). Overview of section 3: Directions our visionary voices. In N. Tucker, L. Highleyman, & R. Kaplan (Eds.) Bisexual politics: Theories, queries, and visions.(pp. 263–266). New York: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, S. (1976/2000). The new Hite report: The revolutionary report on female sexuality updated.London: Hamlyn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, E. (1957). The adjustment of the male overt homosexual. Journal of Projective Techniques, 21(1), 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. H. (1969). The lesbian personality. British Journal of Psychiatry, 115(529), 1433–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janus, S. S. & Janus, C. L. (1993). The Janus report on sexual behaviour.Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, S. (1999). Bisexual politics: A superior form of feminism? Women’s Studies International Forum, 22(3), 273–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. L. (2011). Imagining bisexual futures: Positive, non-normative later life. Journal of Bisexuality, 11(2 & 3), 245–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. L. (2012). Imagining the unimaginable: Bisexual roadmaps for ageing. In R. Ward, I. Rivers, & M. Sutherland (Eds.) Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender ageing: Biographical approaches for inclusive care and support, (pp. 21–38). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorm, A., Korten, A., Rodgers, B., Jacomb, P., & Christensen, H. (2002). Sexual orientation and mental health: Results from a community survey of young and middle-aged adults. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180(5), 423–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, D. C. & Gamets, L. D. (2003). What light it shed: The life of Evelyn Hooker. In L. D. Garnets & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.) Psychological perspectives on lesbian, gay and bisexual experiences, (pp. 31–49). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. & McKeown, E. (2003). Mental health and well-being of gay men, lesbians and bisexuals in England and Wales.London: Mind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male.London: W.B. Saunders Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R (1978/1993). The bisexual option(2nd ed.). New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R, Sepekoff, B., & Wolf, T.J. (1985). Sexual orientation: A multi-variable d5TT.am.ic process. Journal of Homosexuality, 11(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krafft-Ebing, R. (1886/1997). Psychopathia sexualis: The case histories.London: Velvet Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A. P. Jr. (1981). Bisexuality: Some comments on research and theory. Journal of Homosexuality, 6(3), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A. P. Jr. (1983/2000). A little bit of lavender goes a long way: A critique of research on sexual orientation. In P. C. Rodriguez-Rust (Ed.) Bisexuality in the United States: A social science reader, (pp. 24–30). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H. & Johnson, V. E. (1966/1981). Human sexual response.New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H. & Johnson, V. E. (1979). Homosexuality in perspective.Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, K. (2004). Negotiating (non)monogamy: Bisexuality and intimate relationships. Journal of Bisexuality, 4(1/2), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, K. (2007). Hiding in the closet?: Bisexuals, coming out and the disclosure imperative. Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, K. (2008a). Inside, outside, nowhere: Bisexual men and women in the gay and lesbian community. Journal of Bisexuality, 8(1-2), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, K. (2008b). Silences and stereotypes: The impact of (mis)constructions of bisexuality on Australian bisexual men and women. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 4(3), 158–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, L. (Ed.) (2010). Counselling ideologies: Queer challenges to heteronormativity.Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Money, J. (1987). Sin, sickness or status? Homosexual gender identity and psychoneuroendocrinology. American Psychologist, 42(A), 384–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Money, J. (1990). Agenda and credenda of the Kinsey scale. In D. P. McWhirter, S. A. Sanders, & J. M. Reinisch (Eds.) Homosexuality/heterosexuality: Concepts of sexual orientation, (pp. 41–60). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monro, S. (2010). Sexuality, space and intersectionality: The case of lesbian, gay, and bisexual equalities initiatives in UK local government. Sociology, 44(5), 996–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Off Pink Collective (Eds.) (1988). Bisexual lives.London: Off Pink Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhuis, H. (2000). Stepchildren of nature: Krafft-Ebing, psychiatry, and the making of sexual identity.London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, J. P. (1985/2000). Bisexuality: Reassessing our paradigms of sexuality. In P. C. Rodriguez-Rust (Ed.) Bisexuality in the United States: A social science reader.(pp. 11–23). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, G, Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). Sexual arousal patterns of bisexual men. Psychological Science, 16(8), 579–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, G., Rosenthal, A. M., Cash, B. M., Linsenmeier, J. A., Bailey, J. M., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2013). Male bisexual arousal: A matter of curiosity? Biological Psychology, 94(3), 479–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, M., Anderson, E., McCormack, M., Adams, A., & Pitts, R. (2011). The decreasing significance of stigma in the lives of bisexual men: Keynote address, bisexual research convention, London. Journal of Bisexuality, 11(2-3), 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Rust, P. C. (2000a). Popular images and the growth of bisexual community and visibility. In P. C. Rodriguez-Rust (Ed.) Bisexuality in the United States: A social science reader, (pp. 537–553). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Rust, P. (Ed.) (2000b). Bisexuality in the United States: A social science reader.New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., Stevens, C., Pan, Z., Gollain, F., Behr, A., Lano, K., Wilson, V., Chapman, G., & Sands, D. (1996). Bisexual horizons.London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, A. M., Sylva, D., Safron, A., & Bailey, J. M. (2011). Sexual arousal patterns of bisexual men revisited. Biological Psychology, 88, 112–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust, P. C. (1995). Bisexuality and the challenge to lesbian politics: Sex, loyalty, and revolution.London: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, S. (1976). Sexual and social problems of lesbians. Journal of Sex Research, 12(1), 50–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smiley, E. B. (1997). Counseling bisexual clients. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 19(4), 373–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalding, L. R. & Peplau, L. A. (1997). The unfaithful lover: Heterosexuals’ perceptions of bisexuals and their relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(4), 611–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ston, M. (Ed.) (1999). Bisexuality: A critical reader.London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, J. (1999). An American obsession: Science, medicine, and homosexuality in modern society.London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, G., Browne, K., & Gupta, C. (2014). Embracing the ‘and’: Between queer and bi theory at Brighton BiFest. Journal of Homosexuality6(11), 1605–1625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weasel, L. H. (1996). Seeing between the lines: Bisexual women and therapy. Women and Therapy, 19(2), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. (1989). Sex, politics and society: The regulation of sexuality since 1800(2nd ed.). London: Longman Group Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Bruehl, E. (2001). Are human beings by nature bisexual? Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 2(3), 179–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinik, G. (1985). Identity conflict or adaptive flexibility? Journal of Homosexuality, 11(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Helen Bowes-Catton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nikki Hayfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust and West London Mental Health NHS Trust, UK

    Christina Richards (Senior Specialist Psychology Associate and Clinical Research Fellow) (Senior Specialist Psychology Associate and Clinical Research Fellow)

  2. The Open University, UK

    Meg John Barker (Senior Lecturer in Psychology) (Senior Lecturer in Psychology)

Copyright information

© 2015 Helen Bowes-Catton and Nikki Hayfield

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bowes-Catton, H., Hayfield, N. (2015). Bisexuality. In: Richards, C., Barker, M.J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Psychology of Sexuality and Gender. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137345899_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation