Abstract
The Machiavellian aim of “gaining and holding power” by winning a majority of legislative seats is a key aim, arguably the primary purpose, of legislative parties (Kolodny 1998). To be sure, legislative parties also play important roles in building legislative coalitions, passing policy, and organizing the chamber, but each of these legislative roles hinges on gaining or maintaining majority control. In this respect, contemporary parties fit well Anthony Downs’ definition of a political party as “a team of men [and women] seeking to control the governing apparatus by gaining office in a duly constituted election” (1957, 25). Still, what it takes to win enough offices to control the legislature has changed significantly in the last half century, particularly as Congress became more polarized in the post-Reagan era.
Hardball is clean, aggressive Machiavellian politics. It is the discipline of gaining and holding power, useful to any profession or undertaking, but practiced most openly and unashamedly in the world of public affairs.
Christopher Matthews, Hardball: How Politics Is Played
Congressional elections are the ultimate in hardball politics. Members of Congress and those who want to join their ranks must compete for a limited number of positions, and there can be only one winner at the end of each campaign.
Paul S. Herrnson, Playing Hardball: Campaigning for the U.S. Congress
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ajemian, Robert. 1981. “Tip O’Neill on the Ropes.” Time May 18, 17.
Aldrich, John H. Aldrich, and David W. Rohde. 1997–1998. “The Transition to Republican Rule in the House: Implications for Theories of Congressional Politics” Political Science Quarterly 112(4): 541–567.
Cooper, Joseph, and David W. Brady. 1981. “Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn.” American Political Science Review 75(2): 411–425.
Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1983. Legislative Leviathan. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Davis, Tom. 2008. Memorandum to Republican Leadership “Re: Where We Stand Today.” Copy in possession of author.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Gilmour, John B. 1995. Strategic Disagreement: Stalemate in American Politics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Giroux, Gregory L. 2006. “Voter Discontent Fuels Democrats’ Day.” CQ Weekly November 13, 2983–2987.
Hammond, Susan Webb. 1997. Congressional Caucuses in National Policy Making. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Harris, Douglas B. 2005a. “House Majority Party Leaders’ Uses of Public Opinion Information.” Congress & the Presidency 32(2): 133–155.
Harris, Douglas B. 2005b. “Orchestrating Party Talk: A Party-based View of One Minute Speeches in the House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30(1): 127–141.
Harris, Douglas B. 2010. “Partisan Framing in Legislative Debates.” In Winning with Words: The Origins & Impact of Political Framing, edited by Brian F. Schaffner and Patrick J. Sellers, 41–59. New York: Routledge.
Harris, Douglas B. 1998. “The Rise of the Public Speakership.” Political Science Quarterly 113(2): 193–212.
Harris, Douglas B., and Amy Fried. 2010. “Maine’s Political Warriors: Senators Snowe and Collins, Congressional Moderates in a Partisan Era.” The New England Journal of Political Science 4(1): 95–129.
Harris, Douglas B., and Garrison Nelson. 2008. “Middlemen No More? Emergent Patterns in Congressional Leadership Selection.” P.S. Political Science and Politics 41(January 1): 49–55.
Herrnson, Paul S. 1988. Party Campaigning in the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Herrnson, Paul S. 2001. Playing Hardball: Campaigning for the U.S. Congress. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95(3): 619–631.
Highton, Benjamin. 2002. “Bill Clinton, Newt Gingrich, and the 1998 House Elections.” Public Opinion Quarterly 66(1): 1–17.
Jacobson, Gary C. 2000. “Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection.” In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a
Partisan Era, edited by Jon R. Bond and Richard Fleisher, 9–30. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1997. “Civility in the House of Representatives.” The Annenberg Public Policy Center Report #10, Philadelphia, PA.
Kernell, Samuel. 1997. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. 3rd Edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Kolodny, Robin. 1999. “Moderate Success: Majority Status and the Changing Nature of Factionalism in the House Republican Party.” In New Majority or Old Minority? The Impact of Republicans on Congress, edited by Nicol C. Rae and Colton C. Campbell, 153–172. New York: Rowman & Littlefied.
Kolodny, Robin. 1998. Pursuing Majorities: Congressional Campaign Committees in American Politics. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Matthews, Christopher. 1988. Hardball: How Politics is Played—Told by One Who Knows the Game. New York: HarperPerennial.
Mayhew, David R. 2001. America’s Congress: Actions in the Public Sphere, James Madison Through Newt Gingrich. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Menefee-Libey, David. 2000. The Triumph of Campaign-Centered Politics. London: Chatham House.
Neuman, W. Russell, Marion R. Just, and Ann N. Crigler. 1992. Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
O’Neill, Tip with William Novak. 1987. Man of the House. New York: Random House.
Overby, L. Marvin. L. 2006. “Public Opinion Regarding Congressional Leaders: Lessons from the 1996 Elections” Journal of Legislative Studies 12(1)(March): 54–75.
Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political—Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rocca, Michael S. 2007. “Nonlegislative Debate in the U.S. House of Representatives” American Politics Research 35(4): 489–505.
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sellers, Patrick J. 2000. “Manipulating the Message in the U.S. Congress.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 5(1): 21–30.
Sinclair, Barbara. 1995. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sinclair, Barbara. 2006. Party Wars. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Stonecash, Jeffrey, and Nicole Lindstrom. 1999. “Emerging Party Cleavages in the House of Representatives, 1962–1996.” American Politics Quarterly 27(1): 58–88.
Stonecash, Jeffrey M., and Mack D. Mariani. 2000. “Republican Gains in the House in the 1994 Elections: Class Polarization in American Politics.” Political Science Quarterly 115(1): 93–113.
Truman, David B. 1959. The Congressional Party: A Case Study. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2013 Scott A. Frisch and Sean Q Kelly
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harris, D.B. (2013). Let’s Play Hardball. In: Frisch, S.A., Kelly, S.Q. (eds) Politics to the Extreme. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312761_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312761_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-36142-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31276-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)