Skip to main content

U.S. Strategy in the Korean Conflict

  • Chapter
Identity and Change in East Asian Conflicts
  • 90 Accesses

Abstract

It is not surprising that the ideological makeup of the Bush administration produced an approach to the Korean conflict that differed from the Clinton years. The shock of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, however, lent a new focus and urgency to the Bush administration’s foreign policy. Stopping nuclear proliferation became an overriding priority, leading to a sharper departure from the Clinton administration’s engagement approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Nicholas Eberstadt, “North Korea: Beyond Appeasement,” in Robert Kagan and William Kristol, eds., Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Policy (San Francisco, CA: Encounter Books, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karl DeRouen, Jr. and David Jackson, “The Role of Domestic Politics in U.S. Korean Peninsula Policy,” in Uk Heo and Shale Horowitz, eds.; Conflict in Asia: Korea, China-Taiwan, and India-Pakistan (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wade Bose, “Missile Defense: Deploying a Work in Progress,” September 21, 2001. Congressional Research Service, Report IB91141.

    Google Scholar 

  4. John D. Moteff, “Defense Research: DOD’s Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Program,” March 10, 2003. Congressional Research Service, Report IB 10062.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deanne E. Rennack, “North Korea: Economic Sanctions,” January 24, 2003, Congressional Research Service, Report RL31696.

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W.W. Norton, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Shale Horowitz, Uk Heo, Alexander C. Tan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Begovic, M., DeRouen, K. (2007). U.S. Strategy in the Korean Conflict. In: Horowitz, S., Heo, U., Tan, A.C. (eds) Identity and Change in East Asian Conflicts. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230603134_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics