Skip to main content

Europe, China and the Future of Hong Kong

  • Chapter
  • 29 Accesses

Abstract

Although, geographically and historically speaking, Hong Kong has always been part of China, and the PRC has never recognized the status of Hong Kong as a colony, from the perspective of international relations, however, in the 155 years of British rule, Hong Kong has always been considered as part of the West — it always serves first of all Western interests. Westerners prefer to have a ‘base’ in Asia where freedom is safeguarded by the rule of law. This base can serve as a bridgehead from which the Western countries can develop their political and economic exchanges with China and other Asian nations. The tacit consent to British rule by the PRC was due to the fact that Hong Kong as an international city enjoys multiple relations with the West and such relations serve Chinese interests as well, no matter whether China was in a state of isolation as from the 1950s to the 1970s, or in an era of openness and reform starting from the 1980s. Since the 1950s, the tacit acceptance of British rule over Hong Kong by China depends on one condition: Hong Kong must not become a base for subversion against China. This explains why from the 1950s until the 1980s, Taiwan’s activities in Hong Kong were under severe control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See ‘The US Presence in Hong Kong’, The American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong, July 1996; W. M. Morrison and J. P. Hardt, ‘Major issues in US-China Commercial Relations’, in China’s Economic Future: Challenges to U.S. Policy — Study Papers submitted to the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States (Washington DC: US Congress, 1996), p. 477.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Sir Leon Brittan, ‘Europe and Hong Kong: Prospects for Cooperation into the Next Century’, Office of the European Commission in Hong Kong, 31 May 1996, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Differences in consideration of various European countries are analysed in Miguel Santos Neves, ‘Towards a Common China Policy for the EU: a Portuguese Perspective’, in Richard Grant ed., The European Union and China: A European Strategy for the Twenty-First Century (London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1995), p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Etienne Reuter, ‘Hong Kong and the European Union’, East-West Dialogue, 1:1, June 1996, pp. 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wai, T. (2000). Europe, China and the Future of Hong Kong. In: Neves, M.S., Bridges, B. (eds) Europe, China and the Two SARs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599314_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics