Abstract
Although, geographically and historically speaking, Hong Kong has always been part of China, and the PRC has never recognized the status of Hong Kong as a colony, from the perspective of international relations, however, in the 155 years of British rule, Hong Kong has always been considered as part of the West — it always serves first of all Western interests. Westerners prefer to have a ‘base’ in Asia where freedom is safeguarded by the rule of law. This base can serve as a bridgehead from which the Western countries can develop their political and economic exchanges with China and other Asian nations. The tacit consent to British rule by the PRC was due to the fact that Hong Kong as an international city enjoys multiple relations with the West and such relations serve Chinese interests as well, no matter whether China was in a state of isolation as from the 1950s to the 1970s, or in an era of openness and reform starting from the 1980s. Since the 1950s, the tacit acceptance of British rule over Hong Kong by China depends on one condition: Hong Kong must not become a base for subversion against China. This explains why from the 1950s until the 1980s, Taiwan’s activities in Hong Kong were under severe control.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See ‘The US Presence in Hong Kong’, The American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong, July 1996; W. M. Morrison and J. P. Hardt, ‘Major issues in US-China Commercial Relations’, in China’s Economic Future: Challenges to U.S. Policy — Study Papers submitted to the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States (Washington DC: US Congress, 1996), p. 477.
See Sir Leon Brittan, ‘Europe and Hong Kong: Prospects for Cooperation into the Next Century’, Office of the European Commission in Hong Kong, 31 May 1996, p. 4.
Differences in consideration of various European countries are analysed in Miguel Santos Neves, ‘Towards a Common China Policy for the EU: a Portuguese Perspective’, in Richard Grant ed., The European Union and China: A European Strategy for the Twenty-First Century (London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1995), p. 82.
See Etienne Reuter, ‘Hong Kong and the European Union’, East-West Dialogue, 1:1, June 1996, pp. 9–10.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wai, T. (2000). Europe, China and the Future of Hong Kong. In: Neves, M.S., Bridges, B. (eds) Europe, China and the Two SARs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599314_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599314_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42180-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-59931-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)