Abstract
A traditional perspective on education and democratization is to view students as a potent force in the articulation of democracy, and to focus on students as activists and actors in the field of education. Although students do have a crucial role to play in democratization by way of social mobilization and political activism that puts pressures upon state institutions regarding democratic issues such as education, this chapter takes another viewpoint on the equation of democratization and education. It posits that due to policy negligence (particularly the negligence on education), democratization in a larger sense, and particularly students’ engagement, are powerfully threatened. As such, policy as a highly political process and instrument creates a social exclusion of large segments of the youth in various ways. Such policy therefore needs to be challenged. Social exclusion of the young through the inaccessibility to education is an erosion of democracy and equally raises questions of governance. That education is essential to the life of a nation is a truism that persistently bears repetition among many governments, policy makers, and even among the youth and the students themselves. Just like the health service, the other basic social service that ought to be available to all among developing nations is education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carino, L.V., ed. (1986), Bureaucratic Corruption in Asia: Causes, Consequences and Controls, Manila: JMC Press and the College of Public Administration.
Co, E. (2000), ‘Heterogeneity and Co-operation: Youth and Social Engagement in the Philippines’, forthcoming, Philippine Journal of Public Administration.
— (2000), ‘Youth Initiatives in the Service of the Nation: the Philippine Experience’, a paper prepared for The Worldwide Conference on Youth Service, San Jose, Costa Rica, 5–8 January 2000.
— (1993), Making Education Work Book 1: Education and Manpower Development Programs Vol. 1, Manila: Congressional Oversight Committee on Education (EDCOM).
— (1993), Making Education Work Book1: Governance and Management. Vol. 4, Manila: Education Commission (EDCOM).
EDCOM (1993), Making Education Work Book 3: Agenda for Reforms, Manila: Education Commission (EDCOM).
— (1993), Making Education Work Book 1: The Financing of Philippine Education, Vol. 5, Manila: Education Commission (EDCOM).
— (1993) Making Education Work Book 2: Tertiary Education. Vol. 3 Manila: Education Commission (EDCOM).
Fernandez, E. (2000), ‘War Exacts Heavy Toll on Education in Philippine’ Daily Inquirer, 29 May 2000, Manila.
ILO (1995), Report on the Philippines, Geneva: International Labour Organization.
— (1999), Medium Term Philippine Youth Development Plan: 1998–2004, (Manila: National Youth Commission, Republic of the Philippines.
Tan, E. (1991), The Financing of Vocational-technical Education, Manila: National Manpower Youth Council.
World Bank (1988), Philippines: Education Sector Study, Part 2, Manila: Population and Human Resources Asia Regional Office, World Bank.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Co, E.A. (2004). Education as an Instrument of Democratization and Governance. In: Lele, J., Quadir, F. (eds) Democracy and Civil Society in Asia: Volume 2. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285910_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285910_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51425-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28591-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)