Skip to main content
  • 262 Accesses

Abstract

The Introduction sketches the novel conceptual framework of “moral power” by pinpointing the academic “wells” and the “waters” of which it was “filled”. The framework is outlined through the parameters of “morality” bonding them with the selected types of “power”. The monograph justifies the significance of the case study, breaking it down into a tentative subject-object relationship. Thereby, firstly, it recalibrates the European Union (EU) as an actor as compared especially to the USA, Russia and Turkey; secondly, it gazes at the South Caucasus in a variegated fashion. The refreshing analysis is sought through theoretical innovation, policy investigation and empirical saturation. The chapters pertaining to the sub-policies of the EU on the ENP, regionalization, security, conflict resolution and democracy promotion vis-à-vis Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Buzan, B., & Diez, T. (1999). The European Union and Turkey. Survival, 41(1), 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (2000). The Post-modern State and the World Order. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. (n.d.). About Nations in Transit. Washington, DC: Freedom House. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/report-types/nations-transit.

  • Henderson, K., & Weaver, C. (Eds.). (2010). The Black Sea Region and EU Policy: The Challenge of Divergent Agendas. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde-Price, A. (2006, March). ‘Normative’ Power Europe: A Realist Critique. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafalian, A. (2011). Reassessing Security in the South Caucasus: Regional Conflicts and Transformation. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafarova, E. (2014). Conflict Resolution in South Caucasus: Challenges to International Efforts. London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambeck, M., & Ghazaryan, S. (Eds.). (2013). Europe’s Next Unavoidable War. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M. (2005). Why Europe Will Run the 21st Century. London and New York: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucarelli, S. (2006). Interpreted Values: A Normative Reading of EU Role Conceptions and Performance. In O. Elgstrom & M. Smith (Eds.), The European Union’s Roles in International Politics (pp. 47–66). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichol, J. (2009). Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia: Security Issues and Implications for US Interests. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichol, J. (2014). Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia: Political Developments and Implications for US Interests. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohanyan, A. (2015). Networked Regionalism as Conflict Management. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triantaphyllou, D. (Ed.). (2010). The Security Context in the Black Sea Region. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasilyan, S. (2004). The Tale of ‘European Integration’: The Union of Polity and Policy. In Alliances and Leagues of Nations. The Crayenborgh Lecture Series, Papers of the Participants of the History Honors Class (pp. 93–113). Leiden: Leiden University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasilyan, S. (2016a). Comparing the European Union’s Policy Towards the Western Balkans and the South Caucasus. In S. Gstohl (Ed.), The European Neighborhood Policy in a Comparative Perspective: Models, Challenges, Lessons (pp. 163–181). Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasilyan, S. (2016b). Japan’s Policy Towards the South Caucasus: Enigmatic Even If Pragmatic. Asia Europe Journal, 15(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilyan, S., & Petrossian, S. (2013). Armenia’s Integration ‘with’ the EU (Unpublished Policy Paper/Brief). American University of Armenia, Yerevan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C. (2013). The Politics of the Black Sea Region: EU Neighborhood, Conflict Zone or Future Security Community. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, R. (2005). Winning Hearts and Minds for Europe. In R. Youngs (Ed.), Global Europe Report 2: New Terms of Engagement (pp. 30–37). Brussels: The Foreign Policy Centre, British Council.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vasilyan, S. (2020). Introduction. In: 'Moral Power' of the European Union in the South Caucasus. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60198-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics