Skip to main content

Quantitative Methodology

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the methodological choices made in an illustrative complex and longitudinal study of classroom interest in a language task. They walk the reader through choices that must be made in a quantitative analysis step by step while also advocating for best practices in quantitative research, such as using technology as a partner in research methodology, strengthening statistical power by repeated testing of the same participants, and strengthening validity of study results by using a longitudinal design. The chapter’s aim is not to provide a comprehensive treatment of all possible methodological choices the reader may make, but to instead make vivid for the reader how such choices are made by teacher practitioners conducting actual research projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blom, E., & Unsworth, S. (Eds.). (2010). Experimental methods in language acquisition research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D. (2004). Research methods for applied linguistics: Scope, characteristics, and standards. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 476–501). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D. (2014). Mixed methods research for TESOL. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D. (2015). Why bother learning advanced quantitative methods in L2 research. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 9–20). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D., & Rodgers, T. S. (2003). Doing second language research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S., & Hadi, A. S. (2015). Regression analysis by example. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and application (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, P. (2010). Research approaches in applied linguistics. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 45–59). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 56–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, L. K., Ainley, M., & Thompson, A. (2016). Modelling the links between students’ interest in a domain, the tasks they experience and their interest in a course: Isn’t interest what university is all about? Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 57–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, L. K., Ainley, M., Thompson, A., Gibson, A., & Sherlock, Z. (2017). Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of AI and Human task partners. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, L. K., & Carpenter, R. (2006). Bots as language learning tools. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, L. K., & Nakao, K. (2009). Online English practice for Japanese University students: Assessing chatbots. Paper presented at the Japan Association for Language Teaching national conference, Tokyo. Permanent Online Location: http://jalt-publications.org/proceedings/articles/84-jalt2009-proceedings-contents

  • Hattie, J. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London and New York: Routledge and Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J., Ford, W. R., & Farreras, I. G. (2015). Real conversations with artificial intelligence: A comparison between human–human online conversations and human–chatbot conversations. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 245–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, T. (2015). Presenting quantitative data visually. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 78–105). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, T., & Llosa, L. (2015). Design issues and inference in experimental L2 research. Language Learning, 65(S1), 76–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, E. E., Wagner, M., & Park, G. (2014). Mixed methods research in language testing and assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 123–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, J., & Chen, W. (2008). Motivate the learners to practice English through playing with Chatbot CSIEC. In Z. Pan, X. Zhang, A. Rhalib, W. Woo, & Y. Li (Eds.), Technologies for E-learning and digital entertainment (pp. 180–191). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson-Hall, J. (2015). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS and R (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Larson-Hall, J., & Herrington, R. (2009). Improving data analysis in second language acquisition by utilizing modern developments in applied statistics. Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 368–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson-Hall, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). Reporting and interpreting quantitative research findings: What gets reported and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 65(S1), 127–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J. C. (1998). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewen, S., & Gass, S. M. (2009). Research timeline: The use of statistics in L2 acquisition research. Language Teaching, 42(2), 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (Eds.). (2011). Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J. M. (2015). Statistical significance testing in second language research: Basic problems and suggestions for reform. Language Learning, 65(S1), 97–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J. M., Ross, S. J., & Schoonen, R. (2015). Improving second language quantitative research. Language Learning, 65(S1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, L., & Byrnes, H. (2008). The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities: An introduction. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 3–20). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G. (2005). Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 26–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (Eds.). (2015). Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005). On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phakiti, A. (2014). Experimental research methods in language learning. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plonsky, L. (2013). Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(4), 655–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porte, G. K. (2010). Appraising research in second language learning: A practical approach to critical analysis of quantitative research (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roever, C., & Phakiti, A. (2018). Quantitative methods for second language research: A problem-solving approach. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 299–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (1995). Interest and metacognitive word knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracz, S. M. (1992). The interpretation of beta weights in path analysis. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 19, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. (1960). A survey of sampling from contaminated distributions. In I. Olkin, S. G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. G. Madow, & H. B. Mann (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honour of Harold Hotelling (pp. 448–485). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A., & White, G. (2013). Oxford handbooks for language teachers: Technology enhanced language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, R. (2001). Fundamentals of modern statistical methods: Substantially improving power and accuracy. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenifer Larson-Hall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fryer, L.K., Larson-Hall, J., Stewart, J. (2018). Quantitative Methodology. In: Phakiti, A., De Costa, P., Plonsky, L., Starfield, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59899-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59900-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics