Skip to main content

How the Light Gets In: A Theoretical Framework for “Ordinary Agency”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Ethnography of Household Energy Demand in the UK

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability ((PSAS))

  • 251 Accesses

Abstract

A theoretical concept and approach for looking at human agency as embedded in everyday actions—“ordinary agency”—is introduced and discussed here. Recent anthropological re-readings and advancements of Foucault’s work on ethical practices are employed in the development of this approach. The ways in which “ordinary agency” responds to this work, as well as to social sciences of sustainability calls for acknowledging the forms of personal environmental politics that laypeople develop and enact, are discussed. Furthermore, the concept is situated in relation to a critique of “neoliberal agency” and ideas about the connections between approaches to time and understandings of human agency that come from the anthropology of time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aristotle. 1934. The Nicomachean Ethics. London: William Heinemann Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Diane. 1993. Daughters of the Dreaming. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, Maurice. 1977. “The Past and the Present in the Present.” Man 12 (2): 278–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2003. “Neo-Liberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy.” Theory and Event 7: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2006. “American Nightmare.” Political Theory 34: 690–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, Jean, and John Comaroff. 2001. “Millennial Capitalism: First Thoughts on a Second Coming.” In Millennial Capitalism and the Culture of Neoliberalism, edited by Jean Comaroff and John Comaroff, 1–56. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, Veena. 2007. Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikeç, Mustafa. 2005. “Space, Politics, and the Political.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23 (2): 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Pritchard, E.E. 1940. The Nuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faubion, James D. 2001. “Toward an Anthropology of Ethics : Foucault and the Pedagogies of Autopoiesis.” Representations 74 (1): 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faubion, James D. 2011. An Anthropology of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fortes, Meyer. 1949. “Time and Social Structure: An Ashanti Case Study.” In Social Structure: Essays Presented to A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, edited by Meyer Fortes, 54–84. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1990. The History of Sexuality, vol. 2. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2000. Ethics: Subjectiviy and Truth (Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, Alfred. 1992. The Anthropology of Time: Cultural Constructions of Temporal Maps and Images. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershon, Ilana. 2011. “Neoliberal Agency.” Current Anthropology 52 (4): 537–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse, Carol J. 1996. A Moment’s Notice: Time Politics Across Cultures. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, Kersty. 2003. “Thinking Habits into Action : The Role of Knowledge and Process in Questioning Household Consumption Practices.” Local Environment 8 (1): 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, Kersty. 2008. “Reasons to Be Cheerful: Thinking Sustainably in a (Climate) Changing World.” Geography Compass 2 (1): 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, Kersty. 2011. “Environmental Politics, Green Governmentality and the Possibility of a ‘Creative Grammar’ for Domestic Sustainable Consumption.” In Material Geographies of Household Sustainability, edited by Ruth Lane and Andrew Gorman-Murray, 193–210. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidlaw, James. 2014. The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambek, M. 2008. “Value and Virtue.” Anthropological Theory 8 (2): 133–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, Edmund. 1961. Rethinking Anthropology. London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, Thomas. 2001. “‘The Birth of Bio-Politics’: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the College de France on Neo-Liberal Governmentality.” Economy and Society 30: 190–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leve, Lauren. 2011. “‘Identity.’” Current Anthropology 52 (4): 513–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. The Raw and the Cooked: Introduction to a Science of Mythology. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Emily. 2000. “Mind-Body Problems.” American Ethnologist 27: 569–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, Brian. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Daniel. 2001a. The Dialectics of Shopping. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Daniel. 2001b. “Possessions.” In Home Possessions: Material Culture behind Closed Doors, edited by Daniel Miller, 107–122. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Henrietta L. 2011. Still Life: Hopes, Desires and Satisfactions. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morosanu, Roxana. 2013. “Ethical Consumption: Social Value and Economic Practice, by J. Carrier and P. Luetchford.” Anthropology in Action 20 (1): 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, Sherry. 1984. “Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 26: 126–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, Sarah. 2004. Home Truths: Gender, Domestic Objects and Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, Paul. 2000. “Introduction: The History of Systems of Thought.” In Ethics: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, edited by Michel Foucault. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, Renato. 1980. Ilongot Headhunting, 1883–1974: A Study in Society and History. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, Marilyn. 1992. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, Nigel. 2008. Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Roy. 1981. The Invention of Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moroşanu, R. (2016). How the Light Gets In: A Theoretical Framework for “Ordinary Agency”. In: An Ethnography of Household Energy Demand in the UK. Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59341-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59341-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59340-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59341-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics