Skip to main content

Commons as Actuality, Ethos, and Horizon

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Commons in Theory and Practice

Abstract

The idea, and the ideal, of the commons has encountered a surge in popularity in recent years . But the concept itself is at risk of enclosure . While it has become a rallying cry for grassroots, anti-authoritarian, anti-capitalist revolt, today it is also being conscripted to the service of capital’s reproduction . This short essay explains how this is happening, then outlines a three-part method for imagining the commons in a more radical fashion: the actuality of the commons, the spirit of the commons, and the horizon of the commons. It does not provide a guide or a blueprint, but it does suggest a way to make some important distinctions at a very crucial time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Azzellini, D., & Sitrin, M. (2014). They can’t represent us!: Reinventing democracy from Greece to Occupy. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K. (2007). The ‘commons’ versus the ‘commodity’: Alter-globalization, anti-privatization and the human right to water in the global South. Antipode, 39(3), 430–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, M. (2010). Why doesn’t microfinance work?: The destructive rise of local neoliberalism. London and New York: Zed.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (Eds.). (2012). The wealth of the commons: A world beyond market and state. Amherst, MA: Levellers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (Eds.). (2015). Patterns of commoning. Amherst, MA: Commons Strategies Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caffentzis, G. (2012). A tale of two conferences: Globalization, the crisis of neoliberalism and the question of the commons. Borderlands, 11(2). http://www.borderlands.net.au/vol11no2_2012/caffentzis_globalization.pdf

  • Crass, C. (2013). Towards collective liberation: Anti-racist organizing, feminist praxis, and movement building strategy. Oakland, CA: PM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis, M. (2007). The beginning of history: Value struggles and global capitalism. London and Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis, M. (2013). Does capital need a commons fix? Ephemera, 13(3), 603–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis, M. (2014). Social revolution and the commons. South Atlantic Quarterly, 113(2), 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Peuter, G., & Dyer-Witheford, N. (2010). Commons and cooperatives. Affinities: A Journal of Radical Theory, Culture, and Action, 4(1). http://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/affinities/article/view/6147

  • Dixon, C. (2014). Another politics: Talking across today’s transformative movements. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, Z. (2007). Sexual decoys: Gender, race and war in imperial democracy. London and New York: Zed Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Federici, S. (2005). Caliban and the witch: Women, capitalism and primitive accumulation. New York: Autonomedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici, S. (2012a). The reproduction of labor power in the global economy and the unfinished feminist revolution. In Revolution at point zero: Housework, reproduction and feminist struggle (pp. 91–111). Brooklyn, NY and Oakland, CA: Common Notions (PM Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici, S. (2012b). Revolution at point zero: Housework, reproduction, and feminist struggle. Brooklyn, NY and Oakland, CA: Common Notions (PM Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A postcapitalist politics. Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnestoa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haiven, M. (2014a). Crises of imagination, crises of power: Capitalism, creativity and the commons. London and New York: Zed.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haiven, M. (2014b). The creative and the derivative: Historicizing creativity under post-Bretton Woods financialization. Radical History Review, 118, 113–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haiven, M. (2016). The commons against neoliberalism, the commons of neoliberalism, the commons beyond neoliberalism. In S. Springer, K. Birch, & J. MacLeavy (Eds.), The handbook of neoliberalism. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haiven, M., & Khasnabish, A. (2011). What is the radical imagination: A special issue. Affinities, 4(2), i–xxxvii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haiven, M., & Khasnabish, A. (2014). The radical imagination: Social movement research in the age of austerity. London and New York: Zed Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Belknap.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harney, S., & Moten, F. (2013). The undercommons: Fugitive planning & black study. Wivenhoe, New York and Port Watson: Minor Compositions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (2005). Change the world without taking power (New ed.). London and Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. (2010). Crack capitalism. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (2005). Archaeologies of the future: The desire called utopia and other science fictions. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise and fall of disaster capitalism. Toronto: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2015). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostakis, V., & Bauwens, M. (2014). Network society and future scenarios for a collaborative economy. . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberti, S. (2013). Land grabbing: Journeys in the new colonialism. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linebaugh, P. (2009). The Magna Carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1992). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1) (B. Fowkes, Trans.). New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Midnight Notes Collective. (2009). New enclosures. In W. Bonefeld (Ed.), Subverting the present, imagining the future: Insurrection, movement, and commons (pp. 13–26). New York: Autonomedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the web of life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital . New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeson, J. M. (1993). Commoners: Common right, enclosure and social change in England, 1700–1820. Cambridge, MA and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neimanis, A. (2009). Bodies of water, human rights and the hydrocommons. TOPIA, 21, 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, M. (2000). The invention of capitalism: Classical political economy and the secret history of primitive accumulation. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. R. (2014). Grabbing back: Essays against the global land grab. Oakland, CA: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (2012). Subjects of risk: Technologies of gender in the making of millennial modernity. Public Culture, 24(1), 131–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, T. (2014, June 30). The politics of the sharing economy. Public Seminar. Retrieved from http://www.publicseminar.org/2014/06/the-politics-of-the-sharing-economy/

  • Scholz, T. (2016). Platform cooperativism: Challenging the corporate sharing economy. New York: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung. Retrieved from http://www.rosalux-nyc.org/wp-content/files_mf/scholz_platformcooperativism_2016.pdf

  • Sharife, K. (2011). Colonizing Africa’s atmospheric commons. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 22(4), 74–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srnicek, N., & Williams, A. (2015). Inventing the future: Postcapitalism and a world without work. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suvin, D. (1997). Locus, horizon, and orientation: The concept of possible worlds as key to utopian studies. In J. Owen Daniel & T. Moylan (Eds.), Not yet: Reconsidering Ernst Bloch (pp. 122–137). London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P. (1968). The making of the English working class. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, C., Murphy, R. P., & Anderson, W. L. (2008). Institutions, incentives, and disaster relief: The case of the Federal Emergency Management Agency following Hurricane Katrina (W. Block, Ed.). International Journal of Social Economics, 35(7), 501–511.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Haiven .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haiven, M. (2017). Commons as Actuality, Ethos, and Horizon. In: Means, A.J., Ford, D.R., Slater, G.B. (eds) Educational Commons in Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58641-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58641-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58640-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58641-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics