Skip to main content

‘I Lift Up My Eyes to the Hills …’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 445 Accesses

Abstract

Even in a secular age, mountains continue to be sites of religious and spiritual significance, whether on account of their sublime grandeur or with regard to the sense of a different time-order, eternal or sempiternal, that they inspire. This chapter examines two modern thinkers in whom the spiritual significance of mountains is expressed in especially striking terms: John Ruskin and Martin Heidegger. Although these may seem to be thinkers of a very different stamp, they can both be seen as arguing for the importance of art (respectively painting and poetry) in the human response to modernity and industrialization and, through their privileged artists (respectively J. M. W. Turner and Friedrich Hölderlin), giving a special place to representations of mountains that are attentive to their potential spiritual significance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Discussed further below.

  2. 2.

    On the mythology of sacred mountains see Eliade 1986.

  3. 3.

    Dozeman has a further third point, but it is less relevant to our present purpose.

  4. 4.

    Elsewhere, Heidegger makes this point by playing on the German word for ‘to belong’, gehören, which derives from the same root as hören, to hear. Thus, language ‘belongs’ to being by listening to it. See Heidegger 1969. Can we perhaps connect this to the imagery of Moses and Elijah listening for and to the Word of God on their respective mountains?

  5. 5.

    Of course, there will be many cases where there is room for dispute as to how a work actually functions. There may be examples of high-tech bridges that also, in their way, ‘gather’ their environment (the Golden Gate, the eponymous ‘Bridge’ between Denmark and Sweden). And does the installation of an Antony Gormley sculpture on a mountain-side or a shore-line gather or negate its landscape. Judgements will, presumably vary.

  6. 6.

    My translation.

  7. 7.

    Inevitably, there is the further and unavoidable question that the content of these lectures can be related only too easily to Heidegger’s Nazism and to the founding of a would-be 1000-year Reich through national ritual. See Pattison 2015, 319–326 for further discussion.

Bibliography

  • Dozeman, T. B. (1989). God on the mountain. A study of redaction, theology and canon in exodus (pp. 19–24). Atlanta: Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliade, M. (1986). Sacred architecture and symbolism. In M. Eliade (Ed.), Symbolism, the sacred, and the arts (pp. 105–129). New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1969). Identity and difference (trans: Stambaugh, J.). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In The question concerning technology and other essays (pp. 3–35) (trans. and Ed. Lovitt, W.). New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1978a). The origin of the work of art. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Basic writings (pp. 143–187). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1978b). Building dwelling thinking. In M. Heidegger & D. Farrell (Eds.), Basic writings (pp. 319–339). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. D. (1960). Wordsworth and schelling. A typological study of romanticism. Newhaven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, G. (2015). Eternal god/saving time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petrarca, F. (1948). The ascent of mount Ventoux. In E. Cassirer et al. (Eds.), The renaissance philosophy of man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruskin, J. (1904). The queen of the air. London: George Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruskin, J. (1906). Modern painters (Vol. 4). London: Dent. (N.B. This is volume 4 of the published set, but comprises Vol. 5 of Ruskin’s own volume numbering.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pattison, G. (2018). ‘I Lift Up My Eyes to the Hills …’. In: Kakalis, C., Goetsch, E. (eds) Mountains, Mobilities and Movement. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58635-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58635-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58634-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58635-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics