Skip to main content

Debating Marx’s Conception of Class in History

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Alienation and Emancipation in the Work of Karl Marx

Part of the book series: Marx, Engels, and Marxisms ((MAENMA))

  • 1125 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the regrettable extent to which many Marxist theorists—including some of the most influential and best known—have mistaken the elements of liberal social thought variously preserved in Marx’s work for original conceptions of his own, and most especially with respect to the history of class societies. Aside from the texts of “The German Ideology”, Marx’s ideas were developed primarily through the critique of political economy, only occasionally glancing retrospectively at precapitalist social relations. For his purposes, it was sufficient to assert that the history of human social development was the history of exploitive class society. While the historical details might be interesting, sometimes even suggestive, they were not essential in the way that the detailed critique of political economy and close political analysis of contemporary class societies were. It is the misguided efforts of Marxists to construct a history of precapitalist modes of production from his paltry sketches and retrospective commentaries that is really problematic; the occasional errors in his own works do not significantly affect the purposes for which they were intended. Particularly serious distortions of Marx’s ideas exist where they have been conceived in terms of economic determinism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The work of Lucio Colletti can be cited, particularly his essays “Marxism as Sociology” and “Bernstein and the Marxism of the Second International”, both in Lucio Colletti, From Rousseau to Lenin (New York, London: Monthly Review Press, 1972), 3–108; and “The Theory of the Crash”, Telos 13 (1972): 34–46, reprinted in Bart Grahl, and Paul Piccone, Towards a New Marxism (St. Louis: Telos Press, 1973). Raymond Williams’ critical discussion of the major categories of Marxist analysis in Marxism and Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977) is particularly good. For an excellent discussion from a perspective that is more philosophical than Marxist, see Melvin Rader’s Marx’s Interpretation of History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979). For a direct confrontation of contemporary economic determinism, see Ellen M. Wood, “The Separation of the Economic and the Political in Capitalism”, in Democracy Against Capitalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).

  2. 2.

    G. A. Cohen, Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defense (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978); Karl Marx, Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, Part One, ‘Preface’, MECW, vol. 29.

  3. 3.

    As noted previously, the text was written as an introduction for A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy but not published with it, and has been included as part of the Grundrisse, written in the same period.

  4. 4.

    Karl Marx, Grundrisse (New York: Vintage Books, 1973), 87.

  5. 5.

    Ibid., 99–100.

  6. 6.

    Karl Marx, Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, MECW, vol. 29, 299–300, Marx, Grundrisse, 104; Marx, Contribution, 292, 328–9.

  7. 7.

    Karl Marx, Capital, Volume I, MECW, vol. 35, 359.

  8. 8.

    Ibid., 364.

  9. 9.

    Ibid.

  10. 10.

    Ibid., 369–70.

  11. 11.

    Ibid.

  12. 12.

    Marx, Grundrisse, 103.

  13. 13.

    Karl Marx, Poverty of Philosophy, MECW, vol. 6, 179.

  14. 14.

    Ibid., 186.

  15. 15.

    Wood, “Separation”, 71.

  16. 16.

    Ibid., 74.

  17. 17.

    Robert Brenner, “On the Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism”, New Left Review 104 (1977).

  18. 18.

    Rader, Marx’s Interpretation, 59.

  19. 19.

    Draper, Karl Marx’s Theory of Revolution (New York, London: Monthly Review Press, 1978), 2: 250.

  20. 20.

    See works cited in endnote 1.

  21. 21.

    E. P. Thompson, The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays (London: Monthly Review Press, 1978), 250.

  22. 22.

    Ibid.

  23. 23.

    Colletti, “Theory of the Crash”, 44.

  24. 24.

    Thompson, Poverty of Theory, 306.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., 258.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Comninel, G.C. (2019). Debating Marx’s Conception of Class in History. In: Alienation and Emancipation in the Work of Karl Marx. Marx, Engels, and Marxisms. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57534-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics