Skip to main content

One Table – Several Practices: Material Controversies in the Hybrid Operating Room

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 754 Accesses

Abstract

In Chapter 3, Lindberg and Walter present a study of the introduction and use of a ‘hybrid operating room’ at a major Swedish hospital. Hybrid operating rooms are complex as they are both technology and knowledge intensive, and imply the collaboration of several disciplinary groups with different specializations and multiple understandings. Based on field material from an ethnographically inspired longitudinal study, the authors describe negotiations between the stubborn materiality of the table used in this particular room and the need to perform safe medical procedures, based on previous experiences gained in their separate practices. The table was translated into a multifunctional tool that brought about new types of flexibility, enabling as well as restricting what and how can be done in the hybrid room.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Abrahamson, E. (2006). Review of Global ideas: How ideas, objects, and practices travel in the global economy (Eds. B. Czarniawska and G. Sevón). Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(3),512–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berwick, D. M. (2009). What a “Patient-Centered” should mean: Confession of an extremist. Health Affairs, 28(4),555–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonetti, J., Lehr, E., Vesley, M. R., Friedrich, G., Bonaros, N., & Zimrin, D. (2010). Hybrid coronary revascularization: which patients? When? How? Current Opinion Cardiology, 25, 568–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2002). Organizing, process of. In A. Sorge (Ed.) Organization (pp. 314–333). London: Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2004). On time, space, and action nets. Organization, 11(6), 773–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.) Translating organizational change (pp. 13–48). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. (1996). Introduction. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.) Translating organizational change (pp. 1–12). Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. M., Frank, S. P., Fiscella, K., Shields, C. G., Meldrum, S. C., Kravitz, R. L., & Duberstein, P. R. (2005). Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: Theoretical and practical issues. Social Science & Medicine, 61(7), 1516–1528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, R. (2008). The hybrid cardiac catheterization laboratory for congenital heart disease: From conception to completion. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 71, 418–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschauer, S. (1991). The manufacture of bodies in surgery. Social Studies of Science, 21, 279–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, A. L., Regazzoni, P., Steinbrich, W., & Messmer, P. (2000). The multifunctional therapy room of the future: Image guidance, interdisciplinary, integration and impact on patient pathway. European Radiology, 10, 1761–1769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, P. (1981). Ritual in the operating room. Ethnology, 20(4),335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.) Power, action and belief (pp. 264–280). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lega, F., & DePietro, C. (2005). Converging patterns in hospital organizations: Beyond the professional bureaucracy. Health Policy, 74(3), 261–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, K., Styhre, A., & Walter, L. (2012). Assembling healthcare organizations: Practice, materiality and institutions. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y., & Turner, B. A. (1986). Grounded theory and organizational research. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 22(2),141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, T. (2004). Coordination and embodiment in the operating room. Body & Society, 10(1),109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrae Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22, 487–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tantchou, J. C. (2014). Blurring boundaries: structural constraints, space, tools, and agency in an operating theater. Science, Technology & Human Values, 39(3),336–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kajsa Lindberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lindberg, K., Walter, L. (2018). One Table – Several Practices: Material Controversies in the Hybrid Operating Room. In: Hoholm, T., La Rocca, A., Aanestad, M. (eds) Controversies in Healthcare Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55780-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics