Skip to main content

The Field Hypothesis: Quantum Phenomena and Mind/Matter Interaction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 610 Accesses

Abstract

While this book is primarily situated in the disciplines of sociology and social psychology, this chapter introduces the hypothesis of a ‘field’ character of collective consciousness that influences social life and social change. The field hypothesis uses quantum phenomena to connect the human mind with its environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Dean Radin, PhD, is a senior scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS) and an adjunct faculty in the Department of Psychology at Sonoma State University. He has worked in consciousness research for over 25 years. According to Radin, ‘[Recent experiments] suggest that a previously unsuspected cause of global violence and aggression may literally be the chaotic, malevolent thoughts of large numbers of people around the world’ (Radin, 2006, p. 174). The research is in its infancy; however, the work of the Institute of Noetic Science is noteworthy, as noetic researchers attempt to support individual and collective transformation through consciousness research. The Global Consciousness Project is another attempt to detect interactions of global consciousness in physical systems: see http://noosphere.princeton.edu/, accessed October 2010.

  2. 2.

    I conducted personal research interviews on the connection between quantum phenomena and the social sciences with Prof. Wendt at Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, in June–July 2010.

  3. 3.

    For a more general overview of the role of the quantum in social sciences, see a 2005 article by Alexander Wendt entitled ‘Social Theory as Cartesian Science: An Auto-Critique from a Quantum Perspective,’ in Stefano Guzzini and Anna Leander (2005, pp. 181–219).

Bibliography

  • Bohm, D. (2002 [1980]). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, N. (1949). Discussions with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, The Library of Living Philosophers (Vol. 7). La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Fuchs, C. A., Mor, T., Rains, E., Shor, P. W., et al. (1999). Quantum Nonlocality without Entanglement. Physical Review, 59(2), 1070–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhall, A. (2010a). On the Philosophy and Legal Theory of Human Rights in Light of Quantum Holism. World Futures, 66, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47(10), 777–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, G. B. (1998). A Call for Connection: Solutions for Creating a Whole New Culture. Novato, CA: New World Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, V. (1995). Synchronicity, Science and Soul-Making: Understanding Jungian Synchronicity through Physics, Buddhism and Philosophy. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, T. J. (2000). Quantum Physics, Depth Psychology and Beyond. Retrieved June 18, 2012, from www.integralscience.org

  • Pattee, H. (1978). The Complementarity Principle in Biological and Social Structures. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 1(2), 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radin, D. (2006). Entangled Minds: Extrasensory Experiences in Quantum Reality. New York: Pocket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, L. H. (1989). The Curvature of Constitutional Space: What Lawyers Can Learn from Modern Physics. Harvard Law Review, 83(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (2005). Social Theory as Cartesian Science: An Auto-Critique from a Quantum Perspective. In S. Guzzini & A. Leander (Eds.), Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics (pp. 181–219). Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (2010). Flatland: Quantum Mind and the International Hologram. Chap. 11 in M Albert, L. Cederman, & A. Wendt (Eds.), New Systems Theories of World Politics. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (2015). Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J., & Zurek, W. (Eds.). (1983). Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Walker, A. (2018). The Field Hypothesis: Quantum Phenomena and Mind/Matter Interaction. In: Collective Consciousness and Gender. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54414-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics