Abstract
Unlike art thieves, who do not fit a specific criminal profile, art forgers largely do. The vast majority of those who have been found out adhere to a very narrow description, particularly when it comes to their origin story and initial motivation to turn to forgery. This chapter describes this profile, drawing on numerous historical examples of famous forgers to show the remarkable consistency in their biographies. It further describes how a focus on regular forensic testing of objects on the art market would be the best way to curb forgery, since almost no known forgers have bothered to create fraudulent artworks that would fool forensic tests. The fact that the art trade tends to over-rely on connoisseurship and provenance gives the advantage to the forgers, who need to pass off a good story and a reasonably good-looking work of art but one which does not need to do the “heavy lifting” of standing up to scientific tests.
Keywords
This chapter is drawn from several published sources written by the author, including Charney (2015a, b), both of which are based on research in the author’s book Charney (2015).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Greenhalgh family story has been told in many publications, but the author’s insider insight comes from interviewing Vernon Rapley, the former head of Scotland Yard’s Arts and Antiques Unit and the man who arrested the Greenhalgh family. An interview with Vernon Rapley was undertaken by email in 2013 and also gleaned from several public talks that Rapley gave with me, during which he told the story of the Greenhalgh family.
Bibliography
Blinderman, C. (1986). The piltdown inquest. New York: Prometheus Books.
Brewer, J. (2009). The American Leonardo. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Charney, N. (2010). Stealing the mystic lamb. New York: Perseus Books.
Charney, N. (2015a, Spring). A field guide to British art forgers. Frieze Masters.
Charney, N. (2015b, May 16). The art of forgery. The Times.
Charney, N. (2015c). The art of forgery. London: Phaidon.
Dodsley, R. (1761). London and its environs described. London: R. and J. Dodsley.
Felch, J., & Frammolino, R. (2011). Chasing Aphrodite. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Graham, J. (2007). Inventing van Eyck. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Hebborn, E. (1993). Drawn to trouble. New York: Random House.
Hebborn, E. (1996). The art forger’s handbook. New York: Overlook.
Hoving, T. (1997). False impressions. New York: Touchstone.
Keating, T., Norman, G., & Norman, F. (1977). The fake’s progress: The Tom Keating story. London: Hutchinson and Co.
Landesman, P. (2001, March 18). A crisis of fakes. The New York Times Magazine.
MacGillivray, D. (2005, July 2). When is a fake not a fake? When it’s a genuine forgery. The Guardian.
Pierce, P. (2004). The great Shakespeare fraud: The strange, true story of William-Henry Ireland. Erfurt: Sutton.
Russell, M. (2003). Piltdown man: The secret life of Charles Dawson and the world’s greatest archaeological hoax. Stroud: The History Press.
Salisbury, L., & Sujo, A. (2010). Provenance: How a Con Man and a Forger rewrote the history of modern art. London: Penguin.
Stewart, D. (2010). The boy who would be Shakespeare: A tale of forgery and folly. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.
Tromp, H. (2010). A real van Gogh. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Walpole, H. (1780). Anecdotes. London: Strawberry Hills.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Charney, N. (2019). Profiling Art Forgers. In: Hufnagel, S., Chappell, D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook on Art Crime. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54405-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54405-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54404-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54405-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)