Skip to main content

The Neoliberal State and the 2011 English Riots: A Class Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Uprisings

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology ((PSEPS))

Abstract

On 11 August 2011 in Camberwell Green Magistrates Court, a 23-year-old student with no criminal record was sentenced to a prison term of six months for stealing a pack of bottled water worth £3.50. This extraordinarily harsh sentence would normally be cause for widespread denunciation of judicial abuse but, following five nights of fiery rioting across a dozen English cities from 6 to 10 August, the extraordinary turned ordinary for the courts. Whereas the rampant financial criminality at the top of the class structure leading to the near-collapse of the banking system in the autumn of 2008 saw no reactions from criminal justice, even as it sent the UK economy into a tailspin, overturning millions of lives and causing hundreds of billions of pounds in damage, a street fracas at the bottom, estimated to have cost around 300 million pounds, triggered a lightning-fast and brutal response from the penal wing of the state. Those convicted at the Crown Court of robbery (that is, looting, however minor) during these nocturnal disturbances were sentenced with stunning celerity to an average of 29.8 months in prison, nearly treble the usual rate of 10.8 months. Culprits of violent disorder reaped 30.6 months compared with the standard fare of 9.9 months, while those nabbed for theft received sentences nearly twice as long (10.1 months as against 6.6 months). After the riots stopped, the police deployed munificent resources and manifold schemes to track down and round up the looters, mining television footage and web postings, setting up phone lines for snitching, running “Shop A Moron” posters on buses, while politicians promised to cut welfare and housing benefits to the families of the culprits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A damning account of the contribution of systematic illegal behavior to the financial bubble-burst of 2008 is Charles H. Ferguson’s award-winning documentary, The Inside Job (2010). The main reaction of the British government was to roll out a rescue package topping 500 billion pounds, lest the banking system disintegrate.

  2. 2.

    These figures come from Ministry of Justice (2012).

  3. 3.

    One illustration: The BBC was forced to issue an apology following its 9 August interrogation of the veteran broadcaster Darcus Howe. When Howe stated that he was not shocked by the riots, which in his view were an “insurrection” reflecting “the nature of the historical moment,” the interviewer immediately accused him of being a rioter with a criminal past.

  4. 4.

    The exact circumstances of Duggan’s death remain unclear, but on 12 August 2011 the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), with customary obliquity, announced that it “may” have given misleading information to journalists that shots were fired between Duggan and the police—significantly fanning the flames of that week. The official verdict, months later, was that Duggan was armed at the time he was stopped by the police, but never once fired his gun and in fact discarded it well before he was fatally shot in the back. After numerous delays, a public inquest took place from late 2013 to early 2014, and on 8 January a jury delivered its conclusion (an eight to two majority) that Duggan’s death was a “lawful killing” by the police, even though the judge in the case instructed the jury as follows: “If you are sure that he did not have a gun in his hand, then tick the box ‘unlawful killing’” (Press Association, 2013).

  5. 5.

    Data from http://www.newstatesman.com/voices/2014/08/danny-dorling-mapping-august-2011-riots

  6. 6.

    http://beinghumanthesedays.com/zygmunt-bauman-on-the-london-riotszygmunt-bauman-on-the-london-riots/

  7. 7.

    http://leftfootforward.org/2013/09/another-crackdown-on-benefit-fraud-yet-it-accounts-for-just-0-7-per-cent-of-welfare-budget/

  8. 8.

    http://dreamofsafety.blogspot.com/2011/08/paul-gilroy-speaks-on-riots-august-2011.html

  9. 9.

    http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/pms-speech-on-the-fightback-after-the-riots/

  10. 10.

    Quite where this figure came from is still a mystery. For a very detailed catalogue of the eugenic mentality of civil servants who think they can fix Britain’s “troubled families,” and of the abuse of statistics and general skulduggery that underpins the entire troubled families agenda, see the excellent work of Stephen Crossley at https://akindoftrouble.wordpress.com/

  11. 11.

    He has on many occasions spoken of this visit a life-changing experience, “a sort of Damascene point” (ibid.).

  12. 12.

    It was later followed by a package of “policy recommendations” entitled “Breakthrough Britain,” with numerous sub-reports focusing on particular cities: Breakthrough Manchester, Breakthrough Glasgow, Breakthrough Birmingham, etc.

  13. 13.

    These “pathways” are notable for how they reverse social causation in pushing behavioural explanations for poverty. For example, never mind that a massive literature on financial exclusion confirms that poverty is a pathway to “serious personal debt,” the Centre for Social Justice is desperate to show that it is the other way around.

  14. 14.

    Peers and bishops in the House of Lords defeated eight parts of the Welfare Reform Bill, especially its proposal that, regardless of circumstances (disability, family size, etc.), no household should receive more than £26,000 a year in welfare benefits. The Bill then “ping-ponged” (the official language) for several weeks between the House of Lords and the House of Commons, but in the end MPs overturned the concerns and the votes of the Lords and passed the Bill, principally because they managed to turn specific amendments encouraged by the House of Lords into vague ministerial commitments to undertake some form of ‘review.”

  15. 15.

    In one of the more depressing outcomes of the riots, an e-petition calling for convicted rioters to have their benefits permanently removed attracted well over 100,000 signatures. At the time, very few made the point that plans to remove benefits are already underway for those living at the bottom of the class structure.

  16. 16.

    Mead was arguably the most influential scholarly voice behind 1990s welfare-to-work legislation in the USA, consistently arguing that paid employment is an obligation of citizenship.

  17. 17.

    Bratton was attracted to the vacant post of Chief Commissioner of the London Metropolitan Police until it was realized that, as a non-UK citizen, he could not apply.

  18. 18.

    Prominent political figures were at pains to show their annoyance at having to cancel their foreign holidays and return to England to deal with the crisis.

References

  • Bauman, Z. (2011). The London riots—On consumerism coming home to roost. Social Europe Journal. Retrieved August 9, 2011, from http://www.socialeurope.eu/2011/08/the-london-riots-on-consumerism-coming-home-to-roost/

  • Bowling, B. (1999). The rise and fall of New York murder: Zero tolerance or crack’s decline? British Journal of Criminology, 39, 531–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2011). Dad’s gift to me was his optimism. The Sunday Telegraph, June 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M. (2011) “Do riots show that tensions of earlier decades still smoulder?”, The Guardian, 16th August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derbyshire, J. (2010). Poor relations. New Statesman, March 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikec, M. (2007). Badlands of the republic: Space, politics and urban policy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dorling, D. (2010). New Labour and inequality: Thatcherism continued? Local Economy, 25, 397–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorling, D. (2012). Inequality and injustice: Some news from Britain. Urban Geography, 33(5), 621–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddo-Lodge, R. (2011). Twitter didn’t fuel the Tottenham riot. The Guardian. Retrieved August 8, 2011, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/08/tottenham-riot-twitter

  • Gilroy, P. (2013). 1981 and 2011: From social democratic to neoliberal rioting. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 112(3), 550–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, A., & Rosenfeld, R. (Eds.). (2009). Understanding crime trends. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, N., & Mooney, G. (2011). Glasgow’s new urban frontier: ‘Civilising’ the population of ‘Glasgow East’. CITY, 15(1), 4–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guardian/LSE. (2011). Reading the riots: Investigating England’s summer of disorder. London: LSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, L., & Mooney, G. (2013). ‘Welfare Ghettos’ and the ‘Broken Society’: Territorial stigmatization in the contemporary UK. Housing, Theory and Society, 30(1), 46–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, B. (2001). Illusions of order: The false promises of broken windows. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, M. (2011). Behind the riots: What young people think about the 2011 summer unrest. The Guardian. Retrieve September 5, 2011, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/sep/05/young-people-2011-summer-unrest

  • Kalifa, D. (2012). Les Bas-fonds. Histoire d’un Imaginaire. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys, C. (1990). Still a question of hegemony. New Left Review, 181, 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E., & Ward, K. (Eds.). (2011). Mobile urbanism: City policymaking in the global age. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, J. (2014). Private Island: Why Britain now belongs to someone else. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. (2012). Statistical bulletin on the public disorder of 6th to 9th August 2011. September 2012 update. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/statistical-bulletin-on-the-public-disorder-of-6th-9th-august-2011--2

  • Mitchell, K. (2010). Ungoverned space: Global security and the geopolitics of broken windows. Political Geography, 29, 289–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monbiot, G. (2011). Think of a tank. The Guardian, September 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, G. (2009). The ‘Broken Society’ election: Class hatred and the politics of poverty and place in Glasgow East. Social Policy and Society, 8, 437–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, G., & Hancock, L. (2010). Poverty porn and the broken society. Variant, 39–40, 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, G., & Neal, S. (2010). ‘Welfare worries’: Mapping the directions of welfare futures in the contemporary UK. Research, Policy and Planning, 27(3), 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountz, A., & Curran, W. (2009). Policing in drag: Giuliani goes global with illusions of control. Geoforum, 40, 1033–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. (1990). The emerging British underclass. London: Institute for Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Observatorio Metropolitano. (2013). Crisis and revolution in Europe: People of Europe, rise up! Madrid: Traficantes de Suenos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2006). Liberating the city: Between New York and New Orleans. Urban Geography, 27, 681–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2007). Conceptualizing neoliberalism, thinking Thatcherism. In H. Leitner, J. Peck, & E. Sheppard (Eds.), Contesting neoliberalism: Urban frontiers (pp. 26–50). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A., & Riddell, M. (2010). Iain Duncan-Smith: My welfare reforms are Beveridge for today, with a hint of Tebbit. The Daily Telegraph, November 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press Association. (2013). Mark Duggan inquest: Jury told unlawful killing verdict is an option. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/dec/09/mark-duggan-jury-unlawful-killing-verdict-option

  • Probert, R., & Callan, S. (2010). History and family: Setting the records straight. London: Centre for Social Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. (2014). Food precarity in Britain: A case study from Wester Hailes, Edinburgh. MA (Hons) Dissertation, Institute of Geography, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R., & Sassen, S. (2011). Cameron’s broken windows. New York Times, August 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (2011). Revolutionary ambition in an age of austerity. Retrieved from http://uppingtheanti.org/journal/article/13-neil-smith/

  • Sotiris, P. (2010). Rebels with a cause: The December 2008 Greek Youth Movement as the condensation of deeper social and political contradictions. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34, 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutterluty, F. (2014). The hidden morale of the 2005 French and 2011 English riots. Thesis Eleven, 121(1), 38–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, K. (2013). Zero tolerance in Latin America: Punitive paradox in urban policy mobilities. Urban Geography, 34(7), 972–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thane, P. (2010). Happy families? History and family policy. London: British Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickell, A., & Peck, J. (2003). Making global rules: Globalisation or neoliberalization? In J. Peck & H. W.-C. Yeung (Eds.), Remaking the global economy (pp. 163–181). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, I. (2013a). The riots of the underclass? Stigmatisation, mediation and the government of poverty and disadvantage in neoliberal Britain. Sociological Research Online, 18(4), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, I. (2013b). Revolting subjects: Social abjection and resistance in neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2007). Territorial stigmatization in the age of advanced marginality. Thesis Eleven, 91, 66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2009a). Prisons of poverty (Expanded edition). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2009b). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2010). From ‘public criminology’ to the reflexive sociology of criminological production and consumption. British Journal of Criminology, 51, 438–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, P. (2006). Respectability, roughness and ‘race’: Neighbourhood place images and the making of working-class social distinctions in London. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30, 776–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2011). Shoplifters of the world unite. London Review of Books, August 19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slater, T. (2016). The Neoliberal State and the 2011 English Riots: A Class Analysis. In: Mayer, M., Thörn, C., Thörn, H. (eds) Urban Uprisings. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50509-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50509-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50492-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50509-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics