Skip to main content

What Kind of Agency for Children?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disclosing Childhoods

Part of the book series: Studies in Childhood and Youth ((SCY))

Abstract

This chapter explores the question of agency in childhood studies. The fascination of the field with agency as a foundational concept of the ‘new paradigm’ is discussed along with the emerging critiques of the dominant, essentialist uses of the concept and the often uncritical assumptions which surround it. The chapter then proceeds to situate the discussion within broader debates about agency in the social sciences and the ongoing attempts to transform the concept in more fruitful ways by turning towards relational approaches which see agency as assembled and networked. An empirical example is used to illustrate the potential of new materialism in rethinking agency in childhood research. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the challenges that childhood studies faces in rethinking children’s agency as a critical concept within its overall scale-making practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abebe, T., & Kjørholt, A. T. (2009). Social actors and victims of exploitation: Working children in the cash economy of Ethiopia’s south. Childhood, 16(2), 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, S. C., Swanson, K., & Kennedy, E. (2014). Independent child migrants: Navigating relational borderlands. In S. Spyrou & M. Christou (Eds.), Children and Borders (pp. 214–242). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. (2008). Introduction: Emerging models of materiality in feminist theory. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 1–19). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. (Eds.). (2008). Material feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, P. (2016). Critical realism and research design and analysis in geographies of children and young people. In R. Evans & L. Holt (Eds.), Methodological approaches. Geographies of children and young people (Vol. 2). Singapore: Springer Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, N. (2009). Childhood and the politics of scale: Descaling children’s geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 33(2), 190–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balagopalan, S. (forthcoming). Childhood, culture, history: Re-thinking ‘multiple childhoods’. In S. Spyrou, R. Rosen, & D. Cook (Eds.), Reimagining childhood studies. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2008). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 120–154). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvais, C. (forthcoming). Thinking the adult-child relationship with existentialism. In S. Spyrou, R. Rosen, & D. Cook (Eds.), Reimagining childhood studies. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluebond-Langner, M., & Korbin, J. E. (2007). Challenges and opportunities in the anthropology of childhoods: An introduction to children, childhoods, and childhood studies. American Anthropologist, 109(2), 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordonaro, L., & Payne, R. (2012). Ambiguous agency: Critical perspectives on social interventions with children and youth in Africa. Children’s Geographies, 10(4), 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou, M., & Spyrou, S. (2012). Border encounters: How children navigate space and otherness in an ethnically-divided society. Childhood, 19(3), 302–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christou, M., & Spyrou, S. (2014). What is a border? Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot children’s understanding of a contested territorial division. In S. Spyrou & M. Christou (Eds.), Children and Borders (pp. 131–148). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou, M., & Spyrou, S. (2016). The hyphen in between: Children’s intersectional understandings of national identities. Children’s Geographies, 15(1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, J., & Farrugia, D. (2014). Unpacking the black box: The problem of agency in the sociology of youth. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(4), 461–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colebrook, C. (2002). Understanding Deleuze. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. (2011). Editorial: A ghostly presence. Childhood, 18(1), 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. (forthcoming). Panaceas of play: Stepping past the creative child. In S. Spyrou, R. Rosen, & D. Cook (Eds.), Reimagining childhood studies. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010a). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010b). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1–43). Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordero Arce, M. (forthcoming). Who is (to be) the subject of children’s rights? In S. Spyrou, R. Rosen, & D. Cook (Eds.), Reimagining childhood studies. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New materialism: Interviews and cartographies. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (2007). The ‘ontological turn’ in social theory. A Commentary on ‘Human geography without scale’, by Sallie Marston, John Paul Jones II and Keith Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 106–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F. (2016). Neither “thick” nor “thin”: Reconceptualizing agency and childhood relationally. In F. Esser, M. S. Baader, T. Betz, & B. Hungerland (Eds.), Reconceptualizing agency and childhood: New perspectives in childhood studies (pp. 48–60). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F. (2017). Enacting the overweight body in residential child care: Eating and agency beyond the nature-culture divide. Childhood, 24(3), 286–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F., Baader, M. S., Betz, T., & Hungerland, B. (Eds.). (2016). Reconceptualizing agency and childhood. In F. Esser, M. S. Baader, T. Betz, & B. Hungerland (Eds.), Reconceptualizing agency and childhood: New perspectives in childhood studies (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2015). New materialist social inquiry: Designs, methods and the research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2017). Sociology and the new materialism: Theory, research, action. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, A. (2000). Where have all the babies gone? Toward an anthropology of infants (and their caretakers). Anthropological Quarterly, 73(3), 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_witness@second_millennium.femaleman_meets_oncomouse: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekman, S. (2010). The material of knowledge: Feminist disclosures. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hird, M. J. (2009). Feminist engagements with matter. Feminist Studies, 35(2), 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, A. (2009). Agency. In J. Qvortrup, W. Corsaro, & M.-S. Honig (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies (pp. 34–45). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A. (2010). Competition or integration? The next step in childhood studies? Childhood, 17(4), 485–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & James, A. (2008). Key concepts in childhood studies. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, and Singapore: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Prout, A. (Eds.). (1990a). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Prout, A. (1990b). Introduction. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (pp. 1–6). Basingstoke: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., & Prout, A. (1990c). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promise and problems. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (pp. 7–34). Basingstoke: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. (2007). The sociology of childhood as scientific communication: Observations from a social systems perspective. Childhood, 14(2), 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klocker, N. (2007). An example of thin agency: Child domestic workers in Tanzania. In R. Panelli, S. Punch, & E. Robson (Eds.), Global perspectives on rural childhood and youth: Young rural lives (pp. 81–148). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraftl, P. (2013). Beyond ‘voice’, beyond ‘agency’, beyond ‘politics’? Hybrid childhoods and some critical reflections on children’s emotional geographies. Emotion, Space and Society, 9, 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraftl, P., & Horton, J. (forthcoming). Children’s geographies and the ‘new wave’ of childhood studies. In S. Spyrou, R. Rosen, & D. Cook (Eds.), Reimagining childhood studies. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancy, D. F. (2012). Unmasking children’s agency. SSWA Faculty Publications. Paper 277. http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/sswa_facpubs/277.

  • Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. (1998). Towards an immature sociology. The Sociological Review, 46, 458–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. (2000). Faith in the body? Childhood, subjecthood and sociological enquiry. In A. Prout (Ed.), The body, childhood and society (pp. 149–171). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. (2001). Childhood and society: Growing up in an age of uncertainty. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. (2008). Awake, asleep, adult, child: An a-humanist account of persons. Body and Society, 14(4), 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2011). Investigating learning, participation and becoming in early childhood practices with a relational materialist approach. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1), 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M. (2016). The sociology of children, childhood and generation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livesey, G. (2010). Assemblage. In A. Parr (Ed.), The Deleuze dictionary (Rev. ed., pp. 18–19). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K. (2016). Theorizing a child–dog encounter in the slums of La Paz using post-humanistic approaches in order to disrupt universalisms in current ‘child in nature’ debates. Children’s Geographies, 14(4), 390–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marston, S. A., Woodward, K., & Jones, J. P. (2007). Flattening ontologies of globalization: The Nollywood case. Globalizations, 4(1), 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayall, B. (2002). Towards a sociology of childhood: Thinking from children’s lives. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, K., & Elwood, S. (2012). Mapping children’s politics: The promise of articulation and the limits of nonrepresentational theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30, 788–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizen, P., & Ofosu-Kusi, Y. (2013). Agency as vulnerability: Accounting for children’s movement to the streets of Accra. The Sociological Review, 61, 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oswell, D. (2013). The agency of children: From family to global human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswell, D. (2016). Re-aligning children’s agency and re-socialing children in childhood studies. In F. Esser, M. S. Baader, T. Betz, & B. Hungerland (Eds.), Reconceptualizing agency and childhood: New perspectives in childhood studies (pp. 19–33). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R. (2012). Extraordinary survivors’ or ‘ordinary lives’? Embracing ‘everyday agency’ in social interventions with child-headed households in Zambia. Children’s Geographies, 10(4), 399–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A. (2000). Childhood bodies: Construction, agency and hybridity. In A. Prout (Ed.), The body, childhood and society (pp. 1–18). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Prout, A. (2005). The future of childhood: Towards the interdisciplinary study of children. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raithelhuber, E. (2016). Extending agency: The merit of relational approaches for Childhood Studies. In F. Esser, M. S. Baader, T. Betz, & B. Hungerland (Eds.), Reconceptualizing agency and childhood: New perspectives in childhood studies (pp. 89–101). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rautio, P. (2013). Children who carry stones in their pockets: On autotelic material practices in everyday life. Children’s Geographies, 11(4), 394–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rautio, P. (2014). Mingling and imitating in producing spaces for knowing and being: Insights from a Finnish study of child-matter intra-action. Childhood, 21(4), 461–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridge, T. (2006). Childhood poverty: A barrier to social participation. In E. Tisdall, J. Davis, M. Hill, & A. Prout (Eds.), Children, young people and social participation: Participation for what? (pp. 23–28). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D., & Bluebond-Langner, M. (2009, December 2–6). The agency of children: Political and ethical dimensions of the new childhood. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, P. J. (2008). How new is the “new” social study of childhood? The myth of paradigm shift. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, XXXVIII(4), 533–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Eppler, K. (forthcoming). Geographies of play: Scales of imagination in the study of child-made things. In S. Spyrou, R. Rosen, & D. Cook (Eds.), Reimagining childhood studies. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, C. (2012). Ambiguous agencies: Coping and survival in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Children’s Geographies, 10(4), 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spyrou, S. (2000). Education, ideology, and the national self: The social practice of identity construction in the classroom. The Cyprus Review, 12(1), 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyrou, S. (2006). Constructing ‘the Turk’ as an enemy: The complexity of stereotypes in children’s everyday worlds. South European Society and Politics, 11(1), 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spyrou, S., Rosen, R., & Cook, D. (Eds.). (forthcoming-a). Reimagining childhood studies. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyrou, S., Rosen, R., & Cook, D. (forthcoming-b). Reimagining childhood studies: Connectivities relationalities linkages. In S. Spyrou, R. Rosen, & D. Cook (Eds.), Reimagining childhood studies. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (2004). Partial connections (Updated edition). Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (2011). Reconceptualising the nature of childhood. Childhood, 18(4), 420–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (2013). Reconfiguring the natures of childhood. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuana, N. (2008). Viscous porosity: Witnessing Katrina. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 188–213). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turmel, A. (2008). A historical sociology of childhood: Developmental thinking, categorization and graphic visualization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, K. (2011). Accounting for agency. Children and Society, 25(5), 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, K., Millei, Z., & Petersen, E. B. (2015). ‘Special’ non-human actors in the ‘inclusive’ early childhood classroom: The wrist-band, the lock and the scooter board. Global Studies of Childhood, 5(3), 266–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs (Morningside edition). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyness, M. (2006). Childhood and society: An introduction to the sociology of childhood. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyness, M. (2015). Childhood. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spyros Spyrou .

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Spyrou, S. (2018). What Kind of Agency for Children?. In: Disclosing Childhoods. Studies in Childhood and Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47904-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47904-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47903-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47904-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics