Skip to main content

A Three-Layer Approach to Testing of Multi-agent Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Systems Development

Abstract

In this chapter, a complex approach to testing of multi-agent systems is presented. Multi-agent testing should be divided into three layers. On the first layer, the individual agents should be tested. A stochastic approach to unit testing and the use of “stages” can be adopted. A stage is a perceptible segment of a virtual world where an agent is placed that is projected for agent unit testing. On the second layer, deadlocks and similar flaws of agent interaction should be fought. Our method of deadlock detection is based on monitoring recurring agent interactions. On the third layer, the behavior of the entire system is evaluated. Bottlenecks and “hot spots” of the system could cause serious performance problems. Stability of multi-agent systems in case of mass collapse of many agents should be tested using stress tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beck, K. (2003) Test Driven Development: By Example. Addison-Wesley, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bellifemine, F., Poggi, A. and Rimassa, G. (2001) Developing multi-agent systems with JADE. In: Castelfranchi, C. and Lespérance, Y. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents VII. Agent Theories Architectures and Languages, LNAI, Springer Verlag, London, pp. 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bresciani, P., Giorgini, P., Giunchiglia, F., Mylopoulos, J. and Perini, A. (2002) Tropos: An agent-oriented software development methodology. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 8, pp. 203–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burkhard, H. (1993) Liveness and fairness properties in multi-agent systems. In: Bajcsy, R. (ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 93), Morgan Kaufmann Publ., pp. 325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coelho, R., Kulesza, U., Staa, A. and Lucena, C. (2006) Unit testing in multi-agent systems using mock agents and aspects. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Workshop on Software Engineering for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Systems, ACM, New York, pp. 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coffman, E.G., Elphick, M. and Shoshani, A. (1971) System deadlocks. Computing Surveys 2, pp. 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dresner, K. and Stone, P. (2006) Multiagent traffic management: Opportunities for multi-agent learning. In: Tuyls, K. (ed.), LAMAS 2005, LNAI, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gatti, M.A.C. and Staa, A.V. (2006) Testing & debugging multi-agent systems: a state of the art report. Departamento de Informática, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jonker, C.M. and Treur, J. (1998) Compositional verification of multi-agent systems: A formal analysis of pro-activeness and reactiveness. In: Langmaack, H., Pnueli, A. and De Roever, W.P. (eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Compositionality, COMPOS'97, LNCS, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 350–380.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liedekerke, M. and Avouris, N. (1995) Debugging multi-agent systems. Information and Software Technology 37(2), pp. 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mackinnon, T., Freeman, S. and Craig, P. (2000) EndoTesting: Unit testing with mock objects. In: Extreme Programming and Flexible Processes in Software Engineering – XP2000, May 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ndumu, D., Nwana, H., Lee, L. and Collins, J. (1999) Visualising and debugging distributed multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 326–333.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Omicini, A. (2000) SODA: Societies and infrastructures in the analysis and design of agent-based systems. In: First International Workshop, AOSE 2000 on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Padgham, L. and Winikoff, M. (2002) Prometheus: A methodology for developing intelligent agents. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Part 1, July, pp. 15–19, 2002, Bologna, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Poutakidis, D., Padgham, L. and Winikoff, M. (2002) Debugging multi-agent systems using design artifacts: The case of interaction protocols. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, AAMAS'02. July 15–19, 2002, Bologna, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Salamon, T. (2008) Dealing with complexity in a multiagent system (in Czech). In: Fi-scher, J. (ed.), Proceedings of 12th Annual Workshop, University of Economics, Prague, pp. 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sycara, K. (1998) Multiagent systems. AI Magazine 19(2): Summer, pp. 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tesfatsion, L. (2002) Agent-based computational economics: Growing economies from the bot-tom up. ISU Economics Working Paper No. 1, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tiryaki, A.M., Oztuna, S., Dikenelli, O. and Erdur, R.C. (2006) SUNIT: A unit testing framework for test driven development of MASs. In: Padgham, L. and Zambonelli, F. (eds.), AOSE 2006, LNCS, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 156–173.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wooldridge, M. (2002) An introduction to multiagent systems. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N. and Kinny, D. (2000) The Gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3, 285–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter is supported by the European Union in the frame of Unified Program Document 3 under the European Social Fund together with the Czech Republic and the City of Prague.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salamon, T. (2009). A Three-Layer Approach to Testing of Multi-agent Systems. In: Papadopoulos, G., Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, G., Wrycza, S., Zupancic, J. (eds) Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/b137171_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/b137171_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-84809-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-84810-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics