Skip to main content

Near-Field Depositional Model for Salmon Aquaculture Waste

Part of the Handbook of Environmental Chemistry book series (HEC5,volume 5M)

Abstract

An analytical near-field depositional model for solids wastes (organic matter from waste feed and faeces) from open net pen culture of finfish is presented. The model is based on the premise that the statistics of the depth-averaged currents, which are assumed to be normally distributed, determine the distribution of wastes on the ocean bottom. Using a farm configuration consisting of a single net pen, the model is used in a diagnostic mode to quantitatively examine the effects on the waste depositional field or footprint of the farm that result from changing the depth under the net pens and changing the statistics (standard deviations) of the depth-averaged velocity. The model is also used to examine the changes to the farm footprint that result from orientating a two by four linear grouping of net pens perpendicular to and parallel to the principle current direction. The model was tested on an operating Atlantic salmon farm by comparing the predicted organic matter fluxes from the farm with the vertical fluxes of organic matter measured by sediment traps. Based on a rather limited data set, predicted organic matter fluxes were found to be about four to five times higher than observed sedimentation rates. Further, the model predictions were sensitive to the value used for feed waste. The limitations and uncertainties in the model assumptions, parameterizations and in the methodologies used to validate the model are discussed and recommendations for future research are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pearson TH, Black KD (2001) The environmental impacts of marine fish cage culture. In: Black KD (ed) Environmental impacts of aquaculture. CRD, Boca Raton, Florida, p 213

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks KM, Stierns AR, Backman C (2004) Aquaculture 239:81

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Wildish DJ, Dowd D, Sutherland TF, Levings CD (2004) Near-field organic enrichment from marine finfish aquaculture. In: A scientific review of the potential environmental effects of aquaculture in aquatic ecosystems, vol III. Fisheries & Oceans Canada. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 2450:66

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cromey CJ, Nickell TD, Black KD, Provost PG, Griffiths CR (2002) Estuaries 25:916

    Google Scholar 

  5. Panchang VG, Cheng G, Newell C (1997) Estuaries 20:14

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hargrave BT (1994) A benthic enrichment index. In: Hargrave BT (ed) Modelling benthic impacts of organic enrichment from marine aquaculture. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 1949:1

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cromey CJ, Thomas TD, Black KD (2002) Aquaculture 214:211

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Gowen RJ, Smyth D, Silvert W (1994) Modelling the spatial distribution and loading of organic fish farm waste to the seabed. In: Hargrave BT (ed) Modelling benthic impacts of organic enrichment from marine aquaculture. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 1949:19

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hajen WE, Beames RM, Higgs DA, Dosanjh BS (1993) Aquaculture 112:321

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hajen WE, Beames RM, Higgs DA, Dosanjh BS (1993) Aquaculture 112:333

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Forster I (1999) Aquaculture Nut 5:143

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brooks KM, Mahnken CVW (2003) Fish Res 62:255

    Google Scholar 

  13. Findlay RH, Watling L (1994) Toward a process level model to predict the effects of salmon net-pen aquaculture on the benthos. In: Hargrave BT (ed) Modelling benthic impacts of organic enrichment from marine aquaculture. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 1949:47

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen YS, Beveridge MCM, Tefler TC (1999) Aquaculture Res 30:395

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wong KB, Piedrahita RH (2000) Aquaculture Eng 21:233

    Google Scholar 

  16. Iseki K, Whitney F, Wong CS (1980) Bull Plankton Soc Jpn 27:27

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brooks KM (2001) An evaluation of the relationship between salmon farm biomass, organic inputs to sediments, physico-chemical changes associated with those inputs and the infaunal response – with emphasis on total sediment sulfides, total volatile solids, and oxidation-reduction potential as surrogate endpoints for biological monitoring. Final report produced for the Technical Advisory Group. BC Ministry of Environment, Nanaimo p 184

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cromey CJ, Black KD (2005) Modelling the impacts of finfish aquaculture (in this volume). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Baker ET, Milburn HB, Tennant DA (1988) J Mar Res 46:573

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sutherland TF, Martin AJ, Levings CD (2001) ICES J Mar Sci 58:404

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Strain PM, Hargrave BT (2005) Salmon aquaculture, nutrient fluxes and ecosystem processes in southwestern New Brunswick (in this volume). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dario Stucchi .

Editor information

Barry T. Hargrave

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stucchi, D., Sutherland, TA., Levings, C., Higgs, D. Near-Field Depositional Model for Salmon Aquaculture Waste . In: Hargrave, B.T. (eds) Environmental Effects of Marine Finfish Aquaculture. Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 5M. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/b136009

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics