Skip to main content

Determination of hydrodynamic radius: a comparison of ultracentrifuge methods with dynamic light scattering

  • Gels, Emulsions, And Dispersions
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Analytical Ultracentrifugation IV

Part of the book series: Progress in Colloid & Polymer Science ((PROGCOLLOID,volume 107))

Abstract

Hydrodynamic radius, r h, may be determined from the limiting diffusion coefficient, D 0, from the limiting sedimentation coefficient, s 0, or, using simple models for the concentration dependence, from the sedimentation coefficient, s, at a finite concentration. For water/AOT/heptane water-in-oil microemulsions, values of r h determined from s are shown to agree well with those obtained from s 0 or D 0 determined using an analytical ultracentrifuge, and with literature values from dynamic light scattering. For several aqueous polyurethane dispersions, sedimentation velocity demonstrated the presence of small species with r h<5 nm and medium-sized species with r h in the range 10–17 nm, as well as much larger aggregates. For these complex dispersions, dynamic light scattering behavior was dominated by the large aggregates and analysis by the CONTIN method was not able to detect all the species present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hwan R-N, Miller CA, Fort T (1979) J Coll Interf Sci 68:221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnea E, Mizrahi J (1973) Chem Eng J 5:171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Batchelor GK (1972) J Fluid Mech 52:245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Budd PM (1989) In: Allen G, Bevington JC, Booth C, Price C (eds) Comprehensive Polymer Science, Vol 1, Chap 10. Pergamon, Oxford, 199

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mathews MB, Hirschhorn E (1953) J Coll Sci 8:86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eicke H-F, Rehak J (1976) Helv Chim Acta 59:2883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zulauf M, Eicke, H-F (1979) J Phys Chem 83:480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson BH, Steytler DC, Tack RD (1979) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans I 75:481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oldfield C, Freedman RB, Robinson BH (1996) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans I 92:73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson BH, Toprakcioglu C, Dore JC, Chieux P (1984) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans I 80:13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aveyard R, Binks BP, Clark C, Mead J (1986) J Chem Soc, Faraday Trans I 82:125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Aveyard R, Binks BP, Mead J, Clint JH (1988) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans I 84:675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pinfield RK (1996) PhD Thesis, University of Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  14. Provencher SW (1982) Computer Phys Comm 27:213

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. M. Budd .

Editor information

R. Jaenicke H. Durchschlag

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Budd, P.M., Pinfield, R.K., Price, C. (1997). Determination of hydrodynamic radius: a comparison of ultracentrifuge methods with dynamic light scattering. In: Jaenicke, R., Durchschlag, H. (eds) Analytical Ultracentrifugation IV. Progress in Colloid & Polymer Science, vol 107. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0118032

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0118032

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1106-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1656-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics