Skip to main content

Algorithms for identification of continuous time nonlinear systems: a passivity approach. Part I: Identification in open-loop operation Part II: Identification in llosed-loop operation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Nonlinear control in the year 2000 volume 2

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences ((LNCIS,volume 259))

Abstract

Algorithms for the identification of continuous time nonlinear plants operating in open-loop and in closed-loop are presented. An adjustable output error type predictor is used in open-loop operation. An adjustable output error type predictor parametrized in terms of the existing controller and the estimated plant model is used in closed-loop operation. The algorithms are derived from stability considerations in the absence of noise and assuming that the plant model is in the model set. Some convergence results based on passivity concepts are presented. Subsequently the algorithms are analyzed in the presence of noise and when the plant model is not in the model set. Examples illustrate the use of the various algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B.D.O. Anderson. A system theory criterion for positive real matrices. SIAM Journal of Control, 5:171–182, 1967.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. B.D.O Anderson and P.J. Maylan. Synthesis of linear time-varying passive networks. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 21:678–687, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Dasgupta and B.D.O Anderson. A parametrization for the closed-loop identification of nonlinear time-varying systems. Automatica, 32:1349–1360, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. F. De Bruyne, B.D.O Anderson and I.D. Landau. Closed-loop output error identification of nonlinear plants using kernel representations Submitted for the Conference on Decision and Control, Sydney, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C.A. Desoer and M. Vidyasagar. Feedback Systems: Input and Output Properties. Electrical Science Series, Academic Press, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Kristic, I. Kanellakopoulos, and P. Kokotovic. Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design. Wiley, New York, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I.D. Landau. Adaptive Control — The Model Reference Approach. M. Dekker, New York, 1979.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. I.D. Landau and A. Karimi. Recursive algorithms for identification in closed-loop: A unified approach and evaluation. Automatica, 33:1499–1523, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. I.D. Landau, R. Lozano, and M. M'saad. Adaptive Control. Springer Verlag, United Kingdom, 1997.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Linard, B.D.O. Anderson, and F. De Bruyne. Identification of a nonlinear plant under nonlinear feedback using left coprime fraction based representations. Automatica, 35:655–667, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Ljung. System Identification: Theory for the User. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1987.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Ljung and T. Soderstrom. Theory and Practice of Recursive Identification. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1983.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Gevers. Towards a joint design of identification and control? Essays on control: perspectives in the theory and its applications, H.L. Trentelman and J.C. Willems Editors, Birkhäuser, pages 111–151, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K.S. Narendra and A.M. Annaswamy. Stable adaptive systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V.M. Popov. Hyperstability of Automatic Control Systems. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E.D. Sontag. On the input-to-state stability property. European Journal of Control, 1:24–35, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E.T. Van Donkelaar and P.M.J. Van den Hof. Analysis of closed-loop identification with a tailor-made parametrization. Selected Topics in Identification, Modelling and control, 9:17–24, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. De Bruyne, B.D.O. Anderson, N. Linard, and M. Gevers. Gradient expressions for a closed-loop identification scheme with a tailor-made parametrization. Automatica, 35, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. I.D. Landau, B.D.O. Anderson, and F. De Bruyne. Closed loop output error identification algorithms for nonlinear plants. Proc. IEEE-CDC 1999, 606–611, Phoenix Arizona, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Alberto Isidori Françoise Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue Witold Respondek

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Landau, I.D., Anderson, B.D.O., De Bruyne, F. (2001). Algorithms for identification of continuous time nonlinear systems: a passivity approach. Part I: Identification in open-loop operation Part II: Identification in llosed-loop operation. In: Isidori, A., Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue, F., Respondek, W. (eds) Nonlinear control in the year 2000 volume 2. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 259. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0110289

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0110289

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-364-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-569-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics