Abstract
In his last article Against ‘Measurement’ J. S. Bell sums up his well known critique of the problem of explaining the measurement process within the framework of quantum theory. In this article I will discuss the measurement process by analysing the concept of measurement from the epistemological point of view and I will argue against Bell that it belongs to the preconditions of experience to necessarily end up with a “reduction of the wavefunction”. I will consider the “chain of reduction” in detail — from pure states of S ⊗ A (system S and measuring apparatus A) via different kinds of mixtures to pure states of A(S). It turns out that decoherence is not sufficient to explain reduction, but that this can be done in terms of the concept of information within a transcendental approach.
Talk at the X-th Max Born Symposium “Quantum Future”, Wrocław, September 24 – 27, 1997
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bell, J. S. (1965). On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physics, 1:195–200. Reprinted in [Bell 1987].
Bell, J. S. (1976). The Measurement Theory of Everett and de Broglies's Pilot Wave. In [Bell 1987].
Bell, J. S. (1987). Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bell, J. S. (1990). Against ‘Measurement'. Physics World, 8:33–40.
Bohr, N. (1949). Discussions with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics. In Schilpp, P. A. (ed.): Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, The Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. VII, p. 201–241, Evanston, Illinois.
Breuer, T. (1997). Quantenmechanik: Ein Fall für Gödel? Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg.
Drieschner, M. (1979). Voraussage-Wahrscheinlichkeit-Objekt. Über die begrifflichen Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Lecture Notes in Physics 99. Springer, Berlin.
Englert, B.-G., Scully, M. O., Süssmann, G., and Walther, H. (1992). Surrealistic Bohm Trajectories. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 47a:1175–1186. Comment: Dürr et al., Z. Naturf. 48a, 1261 (1993). Reply to Comment: Z. Naturf. 48a, 1263 (1993).
Görnitz, Th. and Weizsäcker, C. F. v. (1991). Steps in the Philosophy of Quantum Theory. In Hennig, J., Lücke, W., and Tolar, J. (eds.), Differential Geometry, Group Representations, and Quantization, Lecture Notes in Physics 379. Springer, Berlin.
Heisenberg, W. (1930). Die physikalischen Prinzipien der Quantentheorie. Hirzel, Leipzig.
Kant, I. (1781). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Riga.
Lyre, H. (1997). Time and Information. In Atmanspacher, H. and Ruhnau, E. (eds.). Time, Temporality, Now: Experiencing Time and Concepts of Time in an Interdisciplinary Perspective. Springer, Berlin.
Lyre, H. (1998). Quantentheorie der Information. Springer, Wien.
Mittelstaedt, P. (1998). The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Measurement Process. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Süssmann, G. (1958). Über den Meßvorgang. Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Heft 88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lyre, H. (1999). Against measurement? — On the concept of information. In: Blanchard, P., Jadczyk, A. (eds) Quantum Future From Volta and Como to the Present and Beyond. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 517. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0105344
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0105344
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65218-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49482-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive