Hexatic glass

  • Eugene M. Chudnovsky
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 492)


This is a short review of the current state of theory and experiment on the structure of elastic lattices weakly interacting with underlying random background. Examples are flux lattices in superconductors, magnetic bubble lattices in ferromagnetic films, charge density waves in semiconductors, and atomic monolayers physisorbed on random surfaces. We shall argue that the orientational order in these systems persists at longer scales than the translational order. The law of the decay of both types of order will be analysed, with the emphasis on its practical implications for superconductors. The depinning transition will be discussed in terms of the mobility of the lattice.


Charge Density Wave Orientational Order Vortex Lattice Flux Line Ferromagnetic Film 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    E.Y. Andrei et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2765 (1988).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    H. Dai, H. Chen, and C.M. Lieber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3183 (1991)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [2a]
    H. Dai and C.M. Lieber, ibid. 69, 1576 (1992).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [3]
    S.E. Nagler et al., Phys. Rev. B32, 7373 (1985)ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [3a]
    N. Greiser et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1706 (1987).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [4]
    R. Seshardi and R.M. Westervelt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2774 (1991); Phys. Rev. B46, 5142 (1992).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [5]
    C.A. Murray et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2312 (1990)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [5a]
    C.A. Bolle et al., ibid. 66, 112 (1991)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [5b]
    D.G. Grier et al., ibid. 66, 2270 (1990).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [6]
    A.I. Larkin, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 58, 1466 (1970) [Sov. Phys. JETP 31, 784 (1970)]Google Scholar
  11. [6a]
    A.I. Larkin and Yu.M. Ovchinnikov, J. Low Temp. Phys. 34, 409 (1979).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [7]
    Y. Imry and S. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1399 (1975).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [8]
    M.P.A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1415 (1989).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [9]
    T. Giamarchi and P. Le Doussal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1530 (1994).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [10]
    E.M. Chudnovsky, Phys. Rev. B40, 11355 (1989)ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [11]
    Phys. Rev. B43, 7831 (1991).Google Scholar
  17. [12]
    M.C. Marchetti and D.R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B41, 1910 (1990).ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [13]
    J. Toner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2531 (1991).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. [14]
    J. Toner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1810 (1991).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. [15]
    E.M. Chudnovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1809 (1991).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. [16]
    R. Dickman and E.M. Chudnovsky, Phys. Rev. B51, 97 (1995).ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. [17]
    For a review, see G. Blatter, M.V. Feigel’man, V.B. Geshkenbein, A.I. Larkin, and V.M. Vinokur, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 1125 (1994).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. [18]
    B.I. Halperin and D.R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 121 (1978)CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. [18a]
    D.R. Nelson and B.I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. B19, 2457 (1979).ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. [19]
    T. Nattermann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2454 (1990).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. [20]
    J-P. Bouchaud, M. Mezard, and J.S. Yedidia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3840 (1991).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. [21]
    R. Dickman and E.M. Chudnovsky, J. Phys. C: Condens. Matter, to appear.Google Scholar
  28. [22]
    E.M. Chudnovsky and R. Dickman, to be published.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugene M. Chudnovsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyLehman CollegeCuny, Bronx

Personalised recommendations