Skip to main content

Consistency of Beeson's formal system RPS and some related results

Part of the Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series (LNM,volume 1388)

Abstract

We prove the consistency of Beeson's formal system RPS and its extensions. The relationships between RPS and various principles of constructive mathematics are investigated.

Keywords

  • constructive mathematics

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Aczel, The type theoretic interpretation of constructive set theory, in “Logic Colloquim '77 (eds. A. MacIntyre, L. Pacholski, and J. Paris),” North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. _____, Frege structures and the notions of proposition, truth, and set, in “The Kleene Symposium (eds. J. Barwise, H. J. Keisler, and K. Kunen),” North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980, pp. 31–60.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Beeson, “Foundations of Constructive Mathematics,” Springer, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Bishop, “Foundations of Constructive Analysis,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Bishop, D. Bridges, “Constructive Analysis,” Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Feferman, A language and axioms for explicit mathematics, in “Algebra and Logic, Lecture Notes in Mathematics No. 450,” Springer, Berlin, 1975, pp. 87–139.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. _____, Constructive theories of functions and classes, in “Logic Colloquium '78: Proceedings of the Logic Colloquium at Mons, 1978 (eds. M. Boffa, D. van Dalen, and K. McAloon),” North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979, pp. 159–224.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Martin-Löf, An Intuitionistic Theory of Types, Predicative Part, in “Logic Colloquium '73,” North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975, pp. 73–118.

    Google Scholar 

  9. _____, Constructive mathematics and computer programming, in “Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science VI (eds. L.J. Cohen, J. Los, H. Pfeiffer, and K. P. Podewski),” North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982, pp. 153–179.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Richman (ed.), “Constructive Mathematics. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 873,” Springer, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Smith, An interpretation of Martin-Löf's type theory in a type-free theory of propositions, J. Symbolic Logic 49 (1984), 730–753.

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. A. S. Troelstra, D. van Dalen (eds.), “The L. E. J. Brouwer Centenary Symposium,” North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kobayashi, S. (1989). Consistency of Beeson's formal system RPS and some related results. In: Shinoda, J., Tugué, T., Slaman, T.A. (eds) Mathematical Logic and Applications. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol 1388. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0083667

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0083667

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-51527-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48220-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive