Advertisement

A mechanical model for biological pattern formation: A nonlinear bifurcation analysis

  • P. K. Maini
  • J. D. Murray
  • G. F. Oster
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series (LNM, volume 1151)

Abstract

We present a mechanical model for cell aggregation in embryonic development. The model is based on the large traction forces exerted by fibroblast cells which deform the extracellular matrix (ECM) on which they move. It is shown that the subsequent changes in the cell environment can combine to produce pattern. A linear analysis is carried out for this model. This reveals a wide spectrum of different types of dispersion relations. A non-linear bifurcation analysis is presented for a simple version of the field equations: a non-standard element is required. Biological applications are briefly discussed.

Keywords

Dispersion Relation Homogeneous Steady State Uniform Steady State Biological Pattern Formation Chick Wing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Davidson, D. (1983). The mechanism of feather pattern development in the chick. 1. The time determination of feather position. J.Embryol.Exp. Morph., 74, 245–259.Google Scholar
  2. Gierer, A. & Meinhardt, H. (1972). A theory of biological pattern formation. Kybernetik, 12, 30–39.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Harris, A.K. (1973) Behaviour of cultured cells on substrata of variable adhesiveness. Exp. Cell Res., 77, 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harris, A.K., Stopak, D. & Wild, P. (1981). Fibroblast traction as a mechanism for collagen morphogenesis. Nature, 290, 249–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lara Ochoa, F. & Murray, J.D. (1983). A non-linear analysis for spatial structure in a reaction diffusion model. Bull.Math.Biol. 45, 917–930.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Matkowsky, B.J. (1970). A simple non-linear dynamic stability problem. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 76, 620–625.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Meinhardt, H. (1982). Models of biological pattern formation. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  8. Murray, J.D. (1977). Lectures on non-linear differential equation models in biology. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Murray, J.D. (1981). On pattern formation mechanisms for Lepidopteran wing patterns and mammalian coat markings. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B295, 473–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Murray, J.D. & Oster, G.F. (1984). Generation of biological pattern and form. I.M.A. J. Maths. Appl. to Biol. & Med., 1Google Scholar
  11. Oster, G.F., Murray J.D. & Harris, A.K. (1983). Mechanical aspects of mesenchymal morphogenesis. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 78, 83–125.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Purcell, E.M. (1977). Life at low Reynolds number. Amer. J. of Phys., 45, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rawles, M. (1963). Tissue interactions in scale and feather development as studied in dermal-epidermal recombinations. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph., 11, 765–789.Google Scholar
  14. Saunders, J.W. & Gasseling, M.T. (1968). Ectodermal-mesenchymal interactions in the origin of limb symmetry. In epithelial-mesenchymal interactions (ed. R. Fleischmajer & R.E. Billingham), pp. 78–97.Google Scholar
  15. Smith, J.C., Tickle, C. & Wolpert, L. (1978). Attenuation of positional signalling in the chick limb by high doses of γ-radiation. Nature, 272, 612–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith, J.C. & Wolpert, L. (1981). Pattern formation along the anteroposterior axis of the chick wing: the increase in width following a polarizing region graft and the effect of X-irradiation. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph., 63, 127–144.Google Scholar
  17. Stuart, E.S. & Moscona, A.A. (1967). Embryonic morphogenesis: Role of fibrous lattice in the development of feathers and feather patterns. Science, 157, 947–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thomas, D. (1975). In analysis and control of immobilized enzyme systems, (Thomas, D. & Kernevez, J.P. eds.) New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 115–150.Google Scholar
  19. Tickle, C. (1981). The number of polarizing region cells required to specify additional digits in the developing chick wing. Nature, 289, 295–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Trinkaus, J.P. (1984). Cells into organs: The forces that shape the embryo. (Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar
  21. Turing, M.A. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., B237, 37–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wessells, N.K. (1965). Morphology and proliferation during early feather development. Dev. Biol., 12, 131–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wolpert, L. (1969). Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J. Theor. Biol., 25, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wolpert, L. & Hornbruch, A. (1981). Positional signalling along the anteroposterior axis of the chick wing. The effect of multiple polarizing region grafts. J. Embryo. Exp. Morph., 63, 145–159.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. K. Maini
  • J. D. Murray
  • G. F. Oster

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations