Defining knowledge layers for textual case-based reasoning

  • Mario Lenz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1488)


Textual CBR applications deal with problems that have traditionally been addressed by the Information Retrieval community, namely the handling of textual documents. Since CBR is an AI technique, the questions arise as to what kind of knowledge may enhance the system, where this knowledge comes from, and how it contributes to the performance of such a system. We will address these questions in this paper by showing how the various pieces of knowledge available in a specific domain can be utilized.


Case-Based Reasoning Textual CBR Intelligent Information Retrieval 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Burke, K. Hammond, V. Kulyukin, S. Lytinen, N. Tomuro, and S. Schoenberg. Question Answering from Frequently Asked Question Files. AI Magazine, 18(2):57–66, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. J. Daniels and E. L. Rissland. What You Saw Is What You Want: Using Cases to Seed Information. In Leake and Plaza [5], pages 325–336.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Glasgow, A. Mandell, D. Binney, L. Ghemri, and D. Fisher. MITA: An information extraction approach to the analysis of free-form text in life insurance application. AI Magazine, 19(1):59–71, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Kunze and A. Hübner. CBR on Semi-structured Documents: The Experience-Book and the FA11Q Project. In Proceedings 6th German Workshop on CBR, 1998.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. B. Leake and E. Plaza, editors. Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development, Proceedings ICCBR-97, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1266. Springer Verlag, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Lenz and H.-D. Burkhard. CBR for Document Retrieval — The FAllQ Project. In Leake and Plaza [5], pages 84–93.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Lenz, H.-D. Burkhard, P. Pirk, E. Auriol, and M. Manago. CBR for Diagnosis and Decision Support. AI Communications, 9(3):138–146, 1996.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. A. Miller. Wordnet: A lexical database for english. Communications of the ACM, 38(11):39–41, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. M. Richter. The knowledge contained in similarity measures. Invited Talk at ICCBR-95, 1995. Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. J. v. Rijsbergen. Information Retrieval. Butterworth-Heinemann, London, 2 edition, 1979.MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Riloff and W. Lehnert. Information extraction as a basis for high-precision text classification. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(3):296–333, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Salton and M. McGill. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Lenz
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Computer ScienceHumboldt UniversityBerlin

Personalised recommendations