Different learning strategies in a case-based reasoning system for image interpretation

  • Petra Perner
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1488)


In our previous work, we introduced the basic structure of a case-based reasoning system for image interpretation, a structural similarity measure, and some fundamental learning techniques. In this paper, we describe more sophisticated learning techniques that are different in abstraction level. We evaluate our method on a set of images from the non-destructive testing domain and show the feasibility of the approach. As result, we can show that conventional image processing methods combined with machine learning techniques form a powerful tool for image interpretation.


CBR Learning Incremental Learning Image Interpretation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. Perner, Case-Based Reasoning for Image Interpretation in Non-Destructive Testing, In Proceedings EWCBR-93, volume 2, pages 403–409, 1993Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Perner and W. Paetzold, An Incremental Learning System for Interpretation of Images, SSPR'94, Oct. 1994 Naharya, In: Shape, Structure, and Pattern Recognition, D. Dori and A. Bruckstein (Eds.), World Scientific Publishing Co., 1995, pp. 311–323.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Perner and W. Paetzold, An Incremental Learning System for Image Interpretation, HTWK Report 5/93Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Perner, P. Anderson, D. Summner, J. Kyle, An Application of Case-based Reasoning in Test Process Diagnosis, IBM International Conference on Expert Systems, Proc. IBM ITL Conference on Expert Systems, Yorktown Heights USA, pp 73–85, Oct. 1992, Plenary TalkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Tombre, “Structural and Syntactic Methods in Line Drawing Analysis: To Which Extent Do They Work?,” In: P. Perner, P. Wang, and A. Rosenfeld, Advances in Structral and Syntactic Pattern Recognition, Springer Verlag 1996, Lncs 1121Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.H. Fisher, “Knowledge Acquisition via Incremental Clustering,” Machine Learning, 2: 139–172, 1987.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.K. Jain and R.C. Dubes, Algorithms for Clustering Data, Prentice Hall, New Jersey 1988.MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Niemann, Pattern Analysis and Understanding, Second Edition, Springer Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Perner,“Ultra Sonic Image Interpretation for Non-Destructive Testing,“ IAPR Workshop on Machine Vision Applications, Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 1996, p. 552–554.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.I. Schlesinger, Mathematical Tools of Picture Processing, Naukowa Duma, Kiew 1989.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Perner, Case-Based Reasoning for Image Interpretation, In: Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, V. Hlava_ and R. šárka, Springer Verlag 1995, pp. 532–537Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.H. Gennari, P. Langley, and D. Fisher, “Models of Incremental Concept Formation,” Artificial Intelligence 40 (1989) 11–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.S. Michalski. A theory and methodology of inductive learning. In R. S. Michalski, J.G. Carbonell, and T.M. Mitchell, (Eds.), Machine Learning: Artificial Intelligence Approach. Morgan Kaufmann, 1983.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manuela M. Veloso, „Merge Strategies for Multiple Case Plan Replay,“ Proceedings ICCBR-97.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petra Perner
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Computer Vision and Applied Computer SciencesLeipzig

Personalised recommendations