Advertisement

A fast, accurate and easy method to position oral implant using computed tomography

Clinical validations
  • Guillaume Champleboux
  • Thomas Fortin
  • H. Buatois
  • Jean Loup Coudert
  • Eric Blanchet
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1496)

Abstract

This paper presents a simple method and new material which allow transferring results of surgical planning — such as the implant fixture axis — to the surgical site. This method is based on drilling a linear guide in a resin splint corresponding to the fixture axis. A simple mechanical setup links the Computed Tomography (CT) data set with the drilling machine. Since the optimal fixture axis is determined with a software interface, it can be transferred as a linear guide to the resin splint with the drilling machine. Technical validation demonstrates that the accuracy of the method is 0.2 mm in translation and 1 degree in rotation. These results provide a high level of accuracy and clinical validation has begun with several patients. The results for the patients are very satisfactory.

Keywords

Compute Tomography Image Compute Tomography Slice Plaster Cast Reference Coordinate System Drilling Machine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Jeffcoat M.K. A Dental implant treatment planning tool for low-cost imaging workstations. In Annual International conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, volume 13, pages 348–349, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edge M.J. Surgical placement guide for use with osteointegrated implants. Journal of Prosthet Dent., 57:719–722, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Fortin, J.L. Coudert, G. Champleboux, P. Sautot, and S. Lavallee. Computer-assisted dental implant surgery using computed tomography. J. of Image Guided Surgery, 1(1):53–58, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bass S.L. The effects of preoperative resorption and jaw anatomy on implant success. A report of 303 cases. Clin. Oral Impl. Res, 2:193–198, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jaffin A. and Berman C. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5 analysis. J. Periodontol., 62:2–4, 1991.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weingart D., Hurzler M.B., and Knode H. Restoration of maxillary residual ridge atrophy using Le Fort I osteotomy with simultaneous endosseous implant placement: Technical Report. Int. J. Oral Maxilofac. Implants, 7:529–535, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duyck J., Naert I.E., Van Oosterwyck H., Van der Sloten J., De Coomans M., Lievens S., and Puers B. Biomechanics of oral implant: a review of the literature. Technology and Health Care, 5:253–273, 1997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Verstreken K., Van Cleynenbreugel J., Marchal G., Naert I., and Suetens P. Computer-Assisted Planning of Oral Implant Surgery: A Three Dimensional Approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 11:806–810, 1996.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Th. Fortin, J.L. Coudert, B. Francois, A. Huet, F. Niogret, M. Jourlin, and Ph. Gremillet. Marsupialization of dentigerous cyst associated with forein body using 3D CT images: a case report. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 22(1):29–33, 1997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Champleboux G., Blanchet E., Fortin Th., and Coudert J.L. A fast, accurate and easy method to position oral implants using computed tomography. In Lemke H.U., Vannier M.V., Inamura K., and Farman A.G., editors, Computer Assisted Radiology. Elsevier Science, 1998.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Solar P., Grampp S., Gsellmann B., Rodinger S., Ulm C., and Truppe M. A computer-aided navigation system for oral implant surgery using 3D-CT reconstruction and real time video-projection. In Lemke H.U., Vannier M.V., Inamura K., and Farman A.G., editors, Computer Assisted Radiology, pages 884–887. Elsevier Science, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Bauer, T. Kaus, T. Gruner, Th. Fleiter, R. Niemeier, and M. Schaich. CT-Data-Based Construction of a dental drilling device. In H.U. Lemke, editor, CAR’96 (Computer Assisted Radiology), pages 958–963. Springer, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guillaume Champleboux
    • 1
  • Thomas Fortin
    • 2
  • H. Buatois
    • 3
  • Jean Loup Coudert
    • 2
  • Eric Blanchet
    • 1
  1. 1.IAB - Faculté de Médecine de GrenobleTIMC-IMAGLa TroncheFrance
  2. 2.Faculté d’Odontologie de LyonLyonFrance
  3. 3.GrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations