Advertisement

Controllers for discrete event systems via morphisms

  • P. Madhusudan
  • P. S. Thiagarajan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1466)

Abstract

We study the problem of synthesising controllers for discrete event systems. Traditionally this problem is tackled in a linear time setting. Moreover, the desired subset of the computations of the uncontrolled system (often called a plant) is specified by automata theoretic means. Here we formulate the problem in a branching time framework. We use a class of labelled transition systems to model both the plant and the specification. We deploy behaviour preserving morphisms to capture the role of a controller; the controlled behaviour of the plant should be related via a behaviour preserving morphism to the specification at the level of unfoldings. One must go over to unfoldings in order to let the controller use memory of the past to carry out its function.

We show that the problem of checking if a pair of finite transition systems — one modelling the plant and the other the specification — admits a controller is decidable in polynomial time. We also show the size of the finite controller, if one exists can be bounded by a polynomial in the sizes of the plant and the specification. Such a controller can also be effectively constructed. We then prove that in a natural concurrent setting, the problem of checking for the existence of a (finite) controller is undecidable.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [AMP]
    E. Asarin, O. Maler, A. Pnueli: Symbolic Controller Synthesis for Discrete and Timed Systems, in P. Antsaklis, W. Kohn, A. Nerode and S. Sastry (Eds.), Hybrid Systems II, 1–20, LNCS 999, Springer, 1995Google Scholar
  2. [BL]
    J. R. Büchi and L. H. Landweber: Solving sequential conditions by finite-state strategies, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 138 (1969) 295–311.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [Ch]
    A. Church: Logic, arithmetic and automata, Proc. Intern. Congr. Math. 1960, Almquist and Wiksells, Uppsala (1963).Google Scholar
  4. [JL]
    B. Jonsson and K. G. Larsen: On the complexity of equation solving in process algebra, LNCS 493, Springer-Verlag (1991) 381–396Google Scholar
  5. [KG]
    Ratnesh Kumar, Vijay K. Garg: Modeling and Control of Logical Discrete Event Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995Google Scholar
  6. [KGM]
    Ratnesh Kumar, Vijay Garg, Steven I. Marcus: On Controllability and Normality of Discrete Event Dynamical Systems. Systems and Control Letters, 17(3):157–168, 1991.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [KS]
    Ratnesh Kumar, Mark A. Shayman: Centralized and Decentralized Supervisory Control of Nondeterministic Systems Under Partial Observation. In Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, FL, December 1994. 3649–3654Google Scholar
  8. [LX]
    K. G. Larsen and L. Xinxin: Equation solving using modal transition systems, LICS'90, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A., (1990) 108–117.Google Scholar
  9. [LP]
    H. Lewis and C. H. Papadimitriou: Elements of the theory of computation, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, U.S.A. (1981).Google Scholar
  10. [LV]
    N. Lynch and F. Vaandrager: Forward and backward simulations, Information and Computation, 121 (2) (1995) 214–233MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [MT]
    P. Madhusudan and P. S. Thiagarajan: Controllers for Discrete Event Systems via Morphisms, Technical Report TCS-98-02, SPIC Mathematical Institute, Chennai, India (1998). Available at http://www.smi.ernet.in.Google Scholar
  12. [O]
    A. Overkamp: Supervisory control using failure semantics and partial specifications, IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, Vol. 42, No. 4 (1997) 498–510MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [PR]
    A. Pnueli and R. Rosner: On the synthesis of a reactive module, Proc. 16th ACM Symp. Princ. of Prog. Lang. (1989) 179–190.Google Scholar
  14. [RW]
    P. J. G. Ramadge and W. M. Wonham: The control of discrete event systems, Proc. of IEEE 77 (1989) 81–98.Google Scholar
  15. [T]
    W. Thomas: Finite strategies in regular infinite games, LNCS 880, Springer-Verlag (1994) 149–158.Google Scholar
  16. [WN]
    G. Winskel and M. Nielsen: Models for concurrency, In: S. Abramsky and D. Gabby (Eds.), Handbook of Logic in computer Science, Vol. 3, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K. (1994).Google Scholar
  17. [WW]
    K. C. Wong, W. M. Wonham: Modular Control and Coordination of Discrete-Event Systems, Discrete Event Dynamic Systems, 6(3):241–273, July 1996MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Madhusudan
    • 1
  • P. S. Thiagarajan
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Mathematical SciencesChennaiIndia
  2. 2.SPIC Mathematical InstituteChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations