Advertisement

An evolvable personal advisor to optimize internet search technologies

  • M. Montebello
  • W. A. Gray
  • S. Hurley
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1460)

Abstract

The use of AI and the application of machine learning techniques to optimize services provided by existing internet search technologies is one way to control and manage the immense and ever-increasing volume of data published on the WWW. Users demand effective and efficient on-line information access to reduce information overload. In this paper we present a novel approach to achieve these objectives by generating information which is of a high recall quality — by reusing the output generated from major search engines and other previously developed systems; and of a high precision calibre — by generating specific user profiles after several interactions with the system. This paper discusses the design issues involved, as well as practical issues such as evolvability, profile generation, and the graphic user interface.

Keywords

Search Engine User Profile Machine Learning Technique External System Intelligent User Interface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T Berners-Lee, R Caillian, A Luotonen, H F Nielsen, and A Secret. The World-Wide Web. Communications of the ACM, 37(8):76–82, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lycos Inc. Welcome to Lycos. http://www.lycos.com/.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Excite Inc. WebCrawler Searching. http://webcrawler.com/.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Excite Inc. Excite. http://www.excite.com/.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P M E DeBra and R D J Post. Searching for arbitrary information in the WWW: the fish-search for mosaic. In Proceedings of the 2nd. international world wide web conference, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V N Gudivada and S Tolety. A multiagent architecture for information retrieval on the world-wide web. Proceedings of the 5th. RIAO conference Computer Assisted Information Searching on the Internet., 1997.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S Spetka. The TkWWW Robot: Beyond browsing. In Proceedings of the 2nd. WWW conference '94: Mosaic and the Web, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M Pazzani, J Muramatsu, and D Billsus. Syskill and Webert: Identifying Interesting Web Sites. AAAI Conference, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C L Green and P Edwards. Using Machine Learning to enhance software tools for internet information management. In A Franz and H Kitamo, editors, AAAI-96, Workshop on Internet-Based Information Systems, pages 48–55. AAAI Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D Mladenic. Personal Web Watcher: Implementation and Design. Technical Report IJS-DP-7472, J Stefan Institute, Llubljana, Slovenia, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E Selberg and O Etzioni. Multi-service search and comparison using the metacrawler. The Web Revolution. Proceedings of the 4th. international world wide web conference, 1995.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D Dreilinger and A E Howe. An information gathering agent for querying web search engines. Technical Report CS-96-111, Computer Science Department, Colorado State University, 1996.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Surflogic. Surfbot, http://www.surfiogic.com/.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Quarterdeck. Webcompass. http://www.quarterdeck.com/qdeck/products/webcompass/.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Metafind. Metafind. http://www.metafind.com/.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M Balabanovic and Y Shoham. Learning Information Retrieval Agents: Experiments with Automated Web Browsing. AAAI Spring Symposeum on Information Gathering, 1995.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H Lieberman. Letizia: An Agent that assists Web Browsing. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1995.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D Eichmann and J Wu. Sulla — a user agent for the web. In 5th. International World Wide Web Conference, 1996.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    T Malone, K Grant, F Turbak, S Brobst, and M Cohen. Intelligent Information-Sharing Systems. Communications of the ACM, 30(5):390–402, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    K Lai, T Malone, and K Yu. Object Lens: A “spreadsheet” for cooperative work. ACM transactions on Office systems, 5(4):297–326, 1988.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J W Sullivan and S W Tyler. Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D N Chin. Intelligent Interfaces As Agents. In Sullivan J W Tyler S W, editor, Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM Press, New York, 1991.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    H Chen. Information retrieval: Neural networks, symbolic learning, and genetic algorithms. Journal of the American Society on Information Sciences, 43(3):194–216, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    D Goldberg, D Nichols, B M Oki, and D Terry. Using Collaborative Filtering to weave an Information Tapestry. Communications of the ACM, 35(12):61–70, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    T Joachims, T Mitchell, D Freitag, and R Armstrong. WebWatcher: Machine Learning and Hypertext. In Morik K and Herrmann J, editors, Fachgruppen treffen Maschinelles Lernen. University of Dortmund, 1995.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    P Edwards, C L Green, P C Lockier, and T C Lukins. Exploiting Learning Technologies for World Wide Web Agents. IEE Colloqium on Intelligent World Wide Web Agents, 1997. Digest No 97/118, IEE, Savoy Place, London.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    G Salton and M J McGill. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, 1983.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Search Engine Watch. http.//searchenginewatch.internet.com/.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Montebello
    • 1
  • W. A. Gray
    • 1
  • S. Hurley
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentCardiff UniversityWales

Personalised recommendations