Secure and efficient metering

  • Moni Naor
  • Benny Pinkas
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1403)


We consider an environment in which many servers serve an even larger number of clients (e.g. the web), and it is required to meter the interaction between servers and clients. More specifically, it is desired to count the number of clients that were served by a server. A major possible application is to measure the popularity of web pages in order to decide on advertisement fees. The metering process must be very efficient and should not require extensive usage of any new communication channels. The metering ­ould also be secure against fraud attempts by servers which inflate the number of their clients and against clients that attempt to disrupt the metering process. We suggest several secure and efficient constructions of metering systems, based on efficient cryptographic techniques. They are also very accurate and can preserve the privacy of the clients.


  1. 1.
    Aho A., Hopcroft J. and Ullman J., The design and analysis of computer algorithms, Addison-Wesley, 1974.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ben-Or M., Goldwasser S. and Wigderson A., Completeness theorems for noncryp-tographic fault tolerant distributed computation, 20th STOC, 1988, 1–9.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carter L. and Wegman M., Universal hash functions, J. of Computer and System Sciences, Vol. 18, 1979, 143–154.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Desmedt Y. and Frankel Y., Threshold cryptosystems, Crypto '89, LNCS 435, 1990, 307–315.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dwork C. and Naor M., Pricing via Processing or Combating Junk Mail, Crypto '92, LNCS 576, 1992, 114–128.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feldman P., A practical scheme for non-interactive verifiable secret sharing, 28th FOCS, 1987, 427–437.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feldman P. and Micali S., An Optimal Probabilistic Protocol for Synchronous Byzan-tine Agreement, SIAM J. on Comp., Vol. 26, No. 4, 1997, 873–933.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frankel Y., Gemmell P., MacKenzie P. D. and Yung M., Optimal-resilience proactive public-key cryptosystems, 38th FOCS, 1997, 384–393.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Franklin M. K. and Malkhi D., Auditable metering with lightweight security, Finan-cial Cryptography '97, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Kilian, Founding Cryptography on Oblivious Transfer, 20th STOC, 1988, 20–31.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jarecki S. and Odlyzko A., An efficient micropayment system based on probabilistic polling, Financial Cryptography '97, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Merkle R., A certified digital signature, Crypto '89, LNCS 435, 1990, 218–238.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McEliece R. J. and Sarwate D. V., On sharing secrets and Reed-Solomon Codes, Comm. ACM, Vol. 24, No. 9, 1981, 583–584.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Novak T. and Hoffman D., New metrics for web media: toward the devel-opment of web measurement standards, Sep. 1996. Manuscript available at Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pedersen T. P., Non-interactive and information-theoretic secure verifiable secret sharing, Crypto '91, LNCS 576, 1991, 129–140.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pitkow J., In search of reliable usage data on the WWW, Sixth International WWW Conf., Apr. 1997.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rabin T. and Ben-Or M., Verifiable secret sharing and multiparty protocols with honest majority, 21st STOC, 1989, 73–85.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kinsman M., Web advertising 1997: market analysis and forecast, Cowles/Simba Information, Stamford, Connecticut. May 1997.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shamir A., How to share a secret, Comm. ACM Vol. 22, No. 11, 1979, 612–613.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wegman M. and Carter L., New hash functions and their use in authentication and set equality, J. of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 20, 1981, 265–279.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    21. Yao A. C., How to generate and exchange secretes, 27th FOCS, 1986, 162–167.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moni Naor
    • 1
  • Benny Pinkas
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Applied Mathematics and Computer ScienceWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations