Advertisement

CICERO: An assistant for planning visits to a museum

  • Dario Maio
  • Stefano Rizzi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 978)

Abstract

In this paper we present Cicero, a system for the assisted planning of personalized itineraries to visit the Ducal Palace in Urbino, Italy. The graphic interface gives users a structured and exhaustive view of the artistic content of the museum, and enables them to choose consciously which aspects to privilege during the visit. According to the user preferences, the system derives a set of constraints and then determines a personalized itinerary by means of a heuristic path-planning algorithm.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    L. Bianco, A. Mingozzi and S. Ricciardelli, “Dynamic programming strategies for the traveling salesman problem with time window and precedence constraints”, Technical Report IASI-C.N.R., Roma, 1992.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    C. Bo, Il Palazzo Ducale di Urbino, Istituto Geografico De Agostini, 1982.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    E. Charniak and D. McDermott, Introduction to artificial intelligence, Addison-Wesley, 1985.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    T. Dean, J. Firby and D. Miller, “Hierarchical planning involving deadlines, travel time and resources”, Computational Intelligence, vol. 4, n. 4, pp. 381–398, 1988.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    L. De Floriani and E. Puppo, “A hierarchical triangle-based model for terrain description”, in Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space, A.U. Frank, I. Campari, U. Formentini Eds., LNCS, 639, Springer-Verlag, pp. 236–251, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Dillon, “Designing the human-computer interface to hypermedia applications”, in Designing hypermedia for learning, D.H. Jonassen and H. Mandl Ed., NATO ASI Series, Springer-Verlag, pp. 185–195, 1990.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    B. Hayes-Roth and F. Hayes-Roth, “A cognitive model of planning”, Cognitive Science, vol. 3, n. 4, pp. 275–310, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    D.S. Johnson and C.H. Papadimitriou, “Performance guarantees for heuristics”, in The travelling salesman problem, E.L. Lawler et al. Ed., John Wiley & Sons, pp. 145–180, 1985.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    R.E. Korf, “Planning as search: a quantitative approach”, Artificial Intelligence, 33, 1987.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    B.J. Kuipers, R. Froom, W. Lee and D. Pierce, “The semantic hierarchy in robot learning”, in Robot learning, Kluwer Academic, pp. 141–170, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. Maio and S. Rizzi, “Knowledge architecture for environment representation in autonomous agents”, Proc. Eighth Int. Symposium on Computer and Information Science, Istanbul, pp. 4–11, 1993.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    D. Maio and S. Rizzi. “A hybrid approach to path planning in autonomous agents”, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Expert Systems for Development, Bangkok, pp. 222–227, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    E.D. Sacerdoti, “Planning in a hierarchy of abstraction spaces”, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, n. 2, pp. 115–135, 1974.MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    A.W. Siegel and S.H. White, “The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments”, in Advances in child development and behavior, H.W. Reese Ed., Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    S. Timpf, G.S. Volta, D. Pollock and M.J. Egenhofer, “A conceptual model of wayfinding using multiple levels of abstraction”, in Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space, A.U. Frank, I. Campari, U. Formentini Eds., LNCS, 639, Springer-Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dario Maio
    • 1
  • Stefano Rizzi
    • 1
  1. 1.DEIS - Facolta' di IngegneriaUniversita' di BolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations