Abstract
Biologists have hotly debated the merits of various algorithms for phylogenetic reconstruction for many years. In this paper, we analyze the performance of the popular neighbor-joining algorithm. In particular, we determine the L ∞ radius under which the method will determine the correct tree topology. In fact, this radius is optimal for all distance-based methods, the class of methods which includes all known tractable methods for which there is any sort of performance guarantee. We also gauge the performance of the algorithm when it is not possible to determine the correct tree topology.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Richa Agarwala, Vineet Bafna, Martin Farach, Babu O. Narayanan, Mike Peterson, and Mikkel Thorup. On the approximability of numerical taxonomy. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 365–372, 1996.
Hans-Jürgen Bandelt and Andreas Dress. Reconstructing the shape of a tree from observed dissimilarity data. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 7:309–343, 1986.
Jean-Pierre Barthélerny and Alain Guénoche. Trees and Proximity Representations. John Wiley & Sons, 1991.
James A. Lavender. Taxonomy with confidence. Mathematical Biosciences, 40:271–280 1978.
James S. Ferris. A probability model for inferring evolutionary trees. Systematic Zoology, 22:250–256, 1973.
Martin Farach and Sampath Kannan. Efficient algorithms for inverting evolution. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eigth Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pages 230–235, 1996.
Olivier Gascuel. A note on sattah and tversky's, saitou and nei's, and studier and keppler's algorithms for inferring phylogenies from evolutionary distances. Mod. Biol. Evol., 11(6):461–963, 1994.
G. R. Grimmett and D. R. Stirzaker. Probability and Random Processes. Oxford University Press, 1992.
James A. Studier and Karl J. Keppler. A note on the neighbor-joining algorithm of saitou and nei. Mol. Biol. Evol., 5(6):729–731, 1988.
N. Saitou and M. Nei. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol., 4:406–425, 1987.
D. L. Swofford, G. J. Olsen, P. J. Waddell, and D. M. Hillis. Phylogenetic inference. In D.M. Hillis, C, Moritz, and B.K. Mable, editors, Molecular Systematics, pages 407–514. Sinauer Associates, Inc., 1996.
Shmuel Sattath and Amos Tversky. Additive similarity trees. Psychometrika, 42(3):319–345, 1977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Atteson, K. (1997). The performance of neighbor-joining algorithms of phylogeny reconstruction. In: Jiang, T., Lee, D.T. (eds) Computing and Combinatorics. COCOON 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1276. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0045077
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0045077
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63357-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69522-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive