Skip to main content

The performance of neighbor-joining algorithms of phylogeny reconstruction

  • Session 4: Computational Biology I
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computing and Combinatorics (COCOON 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1276))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Biologists have hotly debated the merits of various algorithms for phylogenetic reconstruction for many years. In this paper, we analyze the performance of the popular neighbor-joining algorithm. In particular, we determine the L radius under which the method will determine the correct tree topology. In fact, this radius is optimal for all distance-based methods, the class of methods which includes all known tractable methods for which there is any sort of performance guarantee. We also gauge the performance of the algorithm when it is not possible to determine the correct tree topology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Richa Agarwala, Vineet Bafna, Martin Farach, Babu O. Narayanan, Mike Peterson, and Mikkel Thorup. On the approximability of numerical taxonomy. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 365–372, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hans-Jürgen Bandelt and Andreas Dress. Reconstructing the shape of a tree from observed dissimilarity data. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 7:309–343, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jean-Pierre Barthélerny and Alain Guénoche. Trees and Proximity Representations. John Wiley & Sons, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. James A. Lavender. Taxonomy with confidence. Mathematical Biosciences, 40:271–280 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. James S. Ferris. A probability model for inferring evolutionary trees. Systematic Zoology, 22:250–256, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martin Farach and Sampath Kannan. Efficient algorithms for inverting evolution. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eigth Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pages 230–235, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Olivier Gascuel. A note on sattah and tversky's, saitou and nei's, and studier and keppler's algorithms for inferring phylogenies from evolutionary distances. Mod. Biol. Evol., 11(6):461–963, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. R. Grimmett and D. R. Stirzaker. Probability and Random Processes. Oxford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. James A. Studier and Karl J. Keppler. A note on the neighbor-joining algorithm of saitou and nei. Mol. Biol. Evol., 5(6):729–731, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Saitou and M. Nei. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol., 4:406–425, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. L. Swofford, G. J. Olsen, P. J. Waddell, and D. M. Hillis. Phylogenetic inference. In D.M. Hillis, C, Moritz, and B.K. Mable, editors, Molecular Systematics, pages 407–514. Sinauer Associates, Inc., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shmuel Sattath and Amos Tversky. Additive similarity trees. Psychometrika, 42(3):319–345, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Tao Jiang D. T. Lee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Atteson, K. (1997). The performance of neighbor-joining algorithms of phylogeny reconstruction. In: Jiang, T., Lee, D.T. (eds) Computing and Combinatorics. COCOON 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1276. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0045077

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0045077

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63357-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69522-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics