Temporal conversion functions for multitemporal relational databases

  • Cristina De Castro
Contributed Papers
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1175)


Most research in the field of algebras for temporal relational databases concerns the study of operations within each of the formats transaction-time, valid-time, bitemporal and snapshot. Nevertheless, data of different temporal format (multitemporal relational data) should be allowed to interact. Two possible scenarios for this problem are: (1) federated databases, where the interaction is required of databases of different temporal format; (2) databases supporting selective versioning, where, due to the different update frequencies, the attributes are maintained in tables of different temporal formats. A solution to this interoperability problem is neither straightforward nor univocal, since the semantics differences among such data are quite deep. As suggested in [DGS94] for the multitemporal natural join, a first step for the definition of a multitemporal relational algebra can be the conversion to a common temporal format for the execution of operations. The semantic criteria at the basis of the temporal conversion functions in [DGS94] have been long debated for their safeness in the deduction or reconstruction of temporal information. In this paper we revise such criteria, discuss their problems and present several alternative solutions.


Multitemporal Relational Data Temporal Conversion Functions 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [BG93]
    BHARGAVA G., GADIA S.K.: “Relational Database Systems with Zero Information Loss,” IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 1, Feb. 1993.Google Scholar
  2. [DGS94]
    DE CASTRO C., GRANDI F., SCALAS M.R.: “Interoperability of Heterogeneous Temporal Relational Databases”, Proc. of 12th International Conference on Entity-Relationship Approach (ER '93), 460–473, also in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag 1994, Vol. 823, 463–474.Google Scholar
  3. [GST91]
    GRANDI F., SCALAS M.R., TIBERIO P.: “A History Oriented Data View and Operation Semantics for Temporal Relational Databases”, C.I.O.C.-C.N.R. Tech. Rep. No. 76, Bologna, Jan. 1991.Google Scholar
  4. [JW93]
    JAJODIA S., WANG X.S.: “Temporal Mediators: Supporting Uniform Access to Heterogeneous Temporal Databases,” Proc. of Workshop on Interoperability of Database Systems and Database Applications, Fribourg, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. [TCG+93]
    TANSEL A., CLIFFORD J., GADIA V. et al.: Temporal Databases: Theory, Design and Implementation, The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Redwood city, California, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristina De Castro
    • 1
  1. 1.C.S.I.TE. C.N.R.-D.E.I.S. Italian National Research CouncilUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations