Advertisement

Application of AOP for modeling a flexible manufacturing cell

  • Carlos Rodríguez Lucatero
  • Jesús Sánchez-V
  • Sergio Castillo-V
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1456)

Abstract

We present in this paper a proposal for using the agent oriented programming paradigm as a tool for modeling agents that represent some of the elements of a real manufacturing cell. The main motivation in using this programming paradigm is that we want to give some kind of flexibility to manufacturing cells by exploiting the speech acts theory over which is based this paradigm.

Keywords

Multiagent Systems Agent Oriented Languages Scheduling Flexible Manufacturing Cells AGENTO LALO KQML 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [BUR77]
    Burstall, R.M. and Darlington, J “A tranformation system for developing recursive programs”. Journal of the ACM, 24(1):44–67, 1977.Google Scholar
  2. [GRE69]
    Green, C. “Application of theorem proving to problem solving”. Proceedings of the First International Joint Conferece on Artificial Intelligence 1969, pag219–239Google Scholar
  3. [SSA97]
    J. Sánchez, M. Salmerón, J. Alarcón. “A parallel architecture to control flexible manufacturing cells”. International Workshop on Parallel Computation and Scheduling in Computers (PCSC'97). Ensenada, México, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. [SYC95]
    Sycara Katia, Zeng Dajun and Kazuo Mayashita “Using Case-Based Reasoning to Acquire User Scheduling Preferences that Change over Time”. IEEE 1995.Google Scholar
  5. [YS93]
    Yoav Shoham. “Agent Oriented Programming”. Artificial Intelligence 60 (1993), pp. 51–92.Google Scholar
  6. [KRA95]
    Sarit Kraus, Jonathan Wilkenfeld and Gilad Zlotkin “Multiagent negotiation under time constrains”. Artificial Intelligence 75 pag. 297–345, Elsevier Science, 1995.Google Scholar
  7. [LALO97]
    Daniel Gauvin, Hervé Marchal & Wince Delle Donne. GRIM. http://www.crim.ca/sbc/english/lalo, February, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. [CP79]
    Philip R. Cohen & C. Raymond Perrault. “Elements of Plan-Based Theory of Speech Acts”. Cogn. Sci. 3 (1979) 177–212.Google Scholar
  9. [RK91]
    Elaine Rich & Kevin Night. “Artificial Intelligence”. Mc Graw Hill, Second Edition, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. [MS97]
    Mirna Salmerón. “Diseño de una arquitectura de hardware reconfigurable utilizando transputers para el control de una CMF”. Thesis for Master in Computer Science. ITESM-CEM, May 1997.Google Scholar
  11. [LZ97]
    Laura Zavala. “Comunicación tolerante a fallas en sistemas distribuidos”. Thesis (in preparation) for Master in Computer Science. ITESM-CEM, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. [SIM63]
    Simon, H.A. “Experiments with a heuristic compiler”. Journal of the ACM,10:493–506, 1963Google Scholar
  13. [PAR96]
    Wan Parunak. “An introduction to Speech Acts and Dooley Graphs”. http://www.iti.org/ van.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Rodríguez Lucatero
    • 1
  • Jesús Sánchez-V
    • 1
  • Sergio Castillo-V
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentInstituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Campus Estado de MéxicoAtizapán, Edo.de Méx.

Personalised recommendations