A benchmark for Raster to vector conversion systems
This paper presents a benchmark for evaluating the Raster to vector conversion systems. The benchmark is designed for evaluating the performance of graphics recognition systems on images that contain straight lines (solid or dashed), circles (solid or dashed), partial arcs of circles (solid or dashed), as well as, bounding boxes of text blocks within the images. This benchmark gives a scientific comparison of vectorization software and uses practical performance evaluation methods that can be applied to complete vectorization systems. Three systems were evaluated under this benchmark and their performance results are presented in this paper. We hope that this benchmark will help assess the state of the art in graphics recognition and highlight the strengths and weaknesses of current vectorization technology and evaluation methods.
KeywordsEngineering-drawing Benchmark Performance Evaluation Raster of Vector Conversion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.David Byrnes. Raster-to-vector comes of age with AutoCAD Release 14. CADALYST, pages 48–70, December 1997.Google Scholar
- 2.R. Kasturi and I. Phillips. The first international graphics recognition contest — dashed-line recognition competition. Graphics Recognition: Methods and Applications, First International Workshop, University Park, PA, USA, August 1995.Google Scholar
- 3.A. Chhabra and I. Phillips. Web page for the Second International Graphics Recognition Contest — Raster to Vector Conversion. http://graphics.nynexst.com/iapr-tcl0/contest.html.Google Scholar
- 4.Proceedings of Second IAPR Workshop on Graphics Recognition, Nancy, France, August 1997.Google Scholar
- 5.I. Phillips, J. Liang, and R. Haralick. A performance evaluation protocol for engineering-drawing recognition systems. In Proceedings of Second IAPR Workshop on Graphics Recognition, pages 333–346, Nancy, France, August 1997.Google Scholar
- 6.I. Phillips. Users' reference manual. CD-ROM, UW-III Document Image Database-III.Google Scholar
- 7.I. Phillips, J. Ha, R. Haralick, and D. Dori. The implementation methodology for the cd-rom english deocument database. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR'93), pages 484–487, Tsukuba, Japan, October 1993.Google Scholar
- 8.I. Phillips, S. Chen, and R. Haralick. Cd-rom document database standard. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR'93), pages 478–483, Tsukuba, Japan, October 1993.Google Scholar
- 9.VOGLE, a public domain device portable graphics library. ftp://munnari.oz.au/pub/graphics/vogle.tar.gz. Used for the Hershey fonts and the software for rendering the fonts.Google Scholar
- 10.Sam Lefffer and Silicon Graphics, Inc. TIFF software distribution. ftp://ftp.sgi.com/graphics/tiff/tiff v3.4beta036-tar.gz. Used for rendering the training and test images in TIFF CCITT Group 4 format.Google Scholar
- 11.D. Knuth. The portable random number generator. http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/knuth/programs.html. Also published in The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 2/Seminumerical Algorithms, 3rd edition, section 3.6. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA, 1997.Google Scholar
- 12.I. Phillips, J. Liang, R. Haralick, and A. Chhabra. A performance evaluation protocol for graphics recognition systems. In K. Tombre and A. Chhabra, editors, Graphics Recognition: Methods and Applications, Second International Workshop, Nancy, France, August 1997, Selected Papers, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 1998. to appear.Google Scholar