Skip to main content

Emotions as commitments operators: A foundation for control structure in multi-agents systems

  • Epistemological and Ontological Issues
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Agents Breaking Away (MAAMAW 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1038))

Abstract

Typically, multi-agent systems (MAS) relie on sociological theory and use centrally the concept of commitment. A definition as well as a tentative computational model of this concept, emerge from research in sociology and in computer science, leading naturally to the study of resource management. We claim that effective resource management in a distributed system requires powerful control structure yet to be founded. We then propose a model of control that stems from the psychology of human emotions as part of the fundamental definition of more autonomous, and adaptive multi-agent systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gul Agha. Actors. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.L. Austin. How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  3. James R. Averill. Studies in Anger and Agression: Implications for Theories of Emotion. American Psychologist, 38, 1145–1160, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leonard Berkowitz. Pain and Agression: Some Findings and Implications. Motivation and Emotion, 17, 277–293, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alan H. Bond. A Computational Model for Organizations of Cooperating Intelligent Agents. SIGOIS Bulletin, 11, 21–30, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jean-Pierre Briot. Modélisation et Classification de Langages de Programmation Concurrente à Objets: L'Expérience Actalk, Actes du colloque “Langages et Modèles à Objets”. Grenoble, France, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Philip R. Cohen and Hector. J. Levesque. Intention is Choice with Commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 42, 213–261, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Philip R. Cohen and Hector. J. Levesque. Rational Interaction as the Basis for Communication. In Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha E. Pollack, editors, Intentions in Communications, pages 221–255, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Philip R. Cohen and C. Raymond Perrault. Elements of a Plan-Based Theory of Speech Acts. Cognitive Science, 3, 177–212, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Paul Dongha. Toward a Formal Model of Commitment for Resource Bounded Agents. In Michael J. Wooldridge and Nicholas R. Jennings, editors, Intelligent Agents, ECAI-94 Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, pages 86–101. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Christophe Dony. Exception Handling and Object-Oriented Programming: Towards a Synthesis. In Norman Meyrowitz, editor, OOPSLA ECOOP'90 Proceedings, Ottawa, October 21–25 1990, Sigplan Notices, 25 (10), 322–330, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Richard E. Fikes. A Commitment-Based Framework for Describing Informal Cooperative Work. Cognitive Science, 6, 331–347, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Les Gasser. Social Conceptions of Knowledge and Action: DAI Foundations and Open Systems Semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 107–138, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elihu M. Gerson. On ≪Quality Of Life≫. American Sociological Review, 41, 793–806, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ronald R. Hutchinson. The Environmental Causes of Aggression. In James K. Coles & Donald D. Jensen, editors, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1972, pages 155–181, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Alice M. Isen. Positive Affect and Decision Making. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland, editors, Hanbook of Emotion, pages 261–277, New York: The Guilford Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pattie Maes. Situated Agents Can Have Goals. In Pattie Maes, editor, Designing Autonomous Agents: Theory and Practice from Biology to Engineering and Back, pages 49–70. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kathleen M. McGraw. Guilt Following Transgression: An Attribution of Responsibility Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 247–256, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Timothy J. Norman and Derek Long. Alarms: An Implementation of Motivated Agency. Research Note RN/95/24, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK, April 6, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Keith Oatley. Best Laid Schemes: The Psychology of Emotions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Andrew Ortony, G. L. Clore & Allan Collins. The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ira J. Roseman. Appraisal Determinants of Discrete Emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 161–200, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Klaus R. Scherer. Criteria for Emotion-Antecedent Appraisal: A Review. In V. Hamilton, G. H. Bower & N. H. Frijda, editors, Cognitive Perspectives on Emotion and Motivation, pages 89–126. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. John R. Searle. Speech Acts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yoav Shoham & Moshe Tennenholtz. On Social Laws for Artificial Agent Societies: Off-Line Design. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 231–252, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas R. Shultz. From Agency to Intention: A Rule-Based, Computational Approach. In Andrew Whiten, editor, Natural Theories of Mind. Evolution, Development and Simulation of Everyday Mindreading, pages 79–95. Basic Blackwell, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Munindar P. Singh. Multiagent Systems. A Theoretical Framework for Intentions, Know-How, and Communications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Craig A. Smith & Phoebe C. Ellsworth. Patterns of Cognitive Appraisal in Emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Frederick Toates. Motivational Systems. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Daniel Vanderveken. On the Unification of Speech Act Theory and Formal Semantics. In Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha E. Pollack, editors, Intentions in Communications, pages195–220. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bernard Weiner. An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Terry Winograd & Fernando Flores. Understanding Computers and Cognition, New York: Addison Wesley, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Walter Van de Velde John W. Perram

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aubé, M., Senteni, A. (1996). Emotions as commitments operators: A foundation for control structure in multi-agents systems. In: Van de Velde, W., Perram, J.W. (eds) Agents Breaking Away. MAAMAW 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1038. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0031843

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0031843

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60852-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49621-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics