Skip to main content

An argumentation theoretic semantics based on non-refutable falsity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 927))

Abstract

We contend that the well-founded semantics (WFS), for normal program, and similarly the well-founded semantics with explicit negation (WFSX), for extended ones are, by design, overly careful in deciding about the falsity of some atoms, by leaving them undefined.

We've dealt with this issue in normal programs and have previously defined the O-semantics, one that extends WFS by addjoining to it more negative assumptions, at the expense of undefined literals. The goal of this paper is to generalize that work to extended programs, and define a semantics for such programs that enlarges WFSX with more negative assumptions.

To achieve this we view default literals as arguments a rational agent can sustain along with the program. As our goal is to enlarge WFSX, we consider the latter as the common reasoning ground and argumentation tool of agents.

With this basis, and in order to define the semantics, we first formalize the concepts of consistent and non-refutable sets of arguments (or of hypotheses). In general several such sets may exist. So, and in order to define a unique semantics, given by a single set of additional assumptions, we introduce an additional non-refutability of arguments criterium — tenability — for always and finally preferring just one set of arguments over another.

We thank Esprit BR project Compulog 2 (no. 6810) for its support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. José Júlio Alferes. Semantics of Logic Programs with Explicit Negation. PhD thesis, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, October 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. J. Alferes and L. M. Pereira. On logic program semantics with two kinds of negation. In K. Apt, editor, Int. Joint Conf. and Symp. on LP, pages 574–588. MIT Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Bondarenko, F. Toni, and R. Kowalski. An assumption-based framework for nonmonotonic reasoning. In L. M. Pereira and A. Nerode, editors, 2nd Int. Ws. on LP & NMR, pages 171–189. MIT Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Dix. Classifying semantics of logic programs. In A. Nerode, W. Marek, and V. S. Subrahmanian, editors, LP & NMR, pages 166–180. MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Dix. A framework for representing and characterizing semantics of logic programs. In B. Nebel, C. Rich, and W. Swartout, editors, 3rd Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jürgen Dix. A Classification-Theory of Semantics of Normal Logic Programs: I. Strong Properties. Fundamental Informaticae, XXII(3):227–255, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. M. Dung and P. Ruamviboonsuk. Well founded reasoning with classical negation. In A. Nerode, W. Marek, and V. S. Subrahmanian, editors, LP & NMR, pages 120–132. MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. M. Dung. Negation as hypotheses: An abductive framework for logic programming. In K. Furukawa, editor, 8th ICLP, pages 3–17. MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. M. Dung. An argumentation semantics for logic programming with explicit negation. In D. S. Warren, editor, 10th ICLP, pages 616–630. MIT Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz. Logic programs with classical negation. In Warren and Szeredi, editors, 7th ICLP, pages 579–597. MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Van Gelder, K. A. Ross, and J. S. Schlipf. The well-founded semantics for general logic programs. Journal of the ACM, 38(3):620–650, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. C. Kakas and P. Mancarella. Stable theories for logic programs. In Ueda and Saraswat, editors, Int. LP Symp., pages 85–100. MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Kowalski and F. Sadri. Logic programs with exceptions. In Warren and Szeredi, editors, 7th ICLP. MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. M. Pereira and J. J. Alferes. Well founded semantics for logic programs with explicit negation. In B. Neumann, editor, European Conf. on AI, pages 102–106. John Wiley & Sons, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. M. Pereira, J. N. Aparício, and J. J. Alferes. Nonmonotonic reasoning with well founded semantics. In Koichi Furukawa, editor, 8th ICLP, pages 475–489. MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. M. Pereira, J. J. Alferes, and J. N. Aparício. Adding closed world assumptions to well founded semantics. In Fifth Generation Computer Systems, pages 562–569. ICOT, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. M. Pereira, J. J. Alferes, and J. N. Aparício. Default theory for well founded semantics with explicit negation. In D. Pearce and G. Wagner, editors, Logics in AI. Proceedings of the European Ws. JELIA '92, pages 339–356. LNAI 633, Springer-Verlag, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. M. Pereira, J. J. Alferes, and J. N. Aparício. Adding closed world assumptions to well founded semantics (extended improved version). Theoretical Computer Science. Special issue on selected papers from FGCS'92, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. T. Przymusinski. Extended stable semantics for normal and disjunctive programs. In Warren and Szeredi, editors, 7th ICLP, pages 459–477. MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. Przymusinski. A semantics for disjunctive logic programs. In Loveland, Lobo, and Rajasekar, editors, ILPS'91 Ws. in Disjunctive Logic Programs, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. John S. Schlipf. Formalizing a Logic for Logic Programming. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 5:279–302, 1992.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Wagner. A database needs two kinds of negation. In B. Thalheim, J. Demetrovics, and H-D. Gerhardt, editors, Mathematical Foundations of Database Systems, pages 357–371. LNCS 495, Springer-Verlag, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jürgen Dix Louis Moniz Pereira Teodor C. Przymusinski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alferes, J.J., Pereira, L.M. (1995). An argumentation theoretic semantics based on non-refutable falsity. In: Dix, J., Pereira, L.M., Przymusinski, T.C. (eds) Non-Monotonic Extensions of Logic Programming. NMELP 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 927. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0030657

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0030657

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-59467-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49272-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics