TYPELAB: An environment for modular program development

  • F. W. von Henke
  • M. Luther
  • M. Strecker
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1214)


  1. [Bid91]
    Michel Bidoit. Development of modular specifications by stepwise refinements using the PLUSS specification language. Proc. of the Unified Computation Laboratory, Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. [BM92]
    Rod Burstall and James McKinna. Deliverables: a categorical approach to program development in type theory. Technical Report ECS-LFCS-92-242, University of Edinburgh, October 1992.Google Scholar
  3. [Con86]
    R.L. Constable et al. Implementing Mathematics with the Nuprl Proof Development System. Prentice-Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. [Cor95]
    Cristina Cornes et al. The Coq Proof Assistant Reference Manual. INRIA Rocquencourt and CNRS-ENS Lyon, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. [FGT93]
    William M. Farmer, Joshua D. Guttman, and F. Javier Thayer. IMPS: An interactive mathematical proof system. J. of Automated Reasoning, 11:213–248, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [Gog84]
    J.A. Goguen. Parameterized programming. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-10(5), September 1984.Google Scholar
  7. [LP92]
    Zhaohui Luo and Robert Pollack. LEGO Proof Development System: User's Manual. University of Edinburgh, Department of Computer Science, 1992.Google Scholar
  8. [Luo94]
    Zhaohui Luo. Computation and Reasoning. Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  9. [Lut95]
    Marko Luther. Wissensbasierte Methoden zur Beweisunterstützung in Type-ntheorie. Master's thesis, Universität Ulm, 1995. Available at URL /ml-dipl.html.Google Scholar
  10. [MN94]
    Lena Magnusson and Bengt Nordström. The ALF proof editor and its proof engine. In H. Barendregt and T. Nipkow, editors, Types for Proofs and Programs, volume 806 of Springer LNCS, pages 213–237, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. [OSR93]
    S. Owre, N. Shankar, and J.M. Rushby. The PVS Specification Language. Computer Science Lab, SRI International, Menlo Park CA 94025, March 1993.Google Scholar
  12. [SJ94]
    Y. V. Srinivas and R. Jüllig. Specware: Formal support for composing software. Technical Report KES.U.94.5, Kestrel Institute, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. [SLW96]
    M. Strecker, M. Luther, and M. Wagner. Structuring and using a knowledge base of mathematical concepts: A type-theoretic approach. In EC AI-96 Workshop on Representation of mathematical knowledge, pages 23–26, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. [Sor96]
    Maria Sorea. Integration von Gleichheitsbeweisen in einen typentheoretischen Beweiser. Master's thesis, Universität Ulm, 1996. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  15. [vH+96]
    F.W. von Henke, M. Luther, M. Strecker, and M. Wagner. The TYPELAB specification and verification environment. In M. Nivat M. Wirsing, editor, Proceedings AMAST'96, pages 604–607. Springer LNCS 1101, 1996.Google Scholar
  16. [Wag95]
    Matthias Wagner. Entwicklung und Implementierung eines Beweisers für konstruktive Logik. Master's thesis, Universität Ulm, 1995. Scholar
  17. [Wir86]
    Martin Wirsing. Structured algebraic specifications: A kernel language. Theoretical Computer Science, 42:123–249, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. W. von Henke
    • 1
  • M. Luther
    • 1
  • M. Strecker
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität UlmUlmGermany

Personalised recommendations