Advertisement

Some requirements and approaches for natural language in a believable agent

  • A. Bryan Loyall
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1195)

Abstract

The goal of creating resource-bounded believable agents that use language and action raises interesting issues for the various components of the agent. In this paper we explore these issues, focusing particularly on their relation to natural language understanding in such agents. The specific issues we address are: responsiveness and interruptability; pursuing multiple independent goals concurrently; designing and managing groups of goals to execute concurrently for specific effects (for example, pointing and talking or understanding such gesture and language combinations); understanding incomplete or ungrammatical language or behaviors; the effects of failure in a larger agent; and consistency between the components of the agent. For each of these issues we argue why it is important for our goals, describe how it relates to natural language, describe our approaches to it, and describe the experience we are drawing on in making our conclusions.

Keywords

Natural Language Language Understanding Cognitive Science Society Primitive Action Natural Language Generation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agre P.-E., Chapman D. (1990) What are plans for? In: Robotics and Autonomous Systems. Elsevier Science PublishersGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bates J., Loyall A.B., Reilly W.S. (1992) An architecture for action, emotion, and social behavior. In: Proc. of the Fourth European Workshop on Modeling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, S.Martino al Cimino, Italy, July 1992Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bates J., Loyall A.B., Reilly W.S. Integrating reactivity, goals, and emotion in a broad agent. In: Proc. of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Bloomington, IN, July 1992Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dyer M. (1983) In-Depth Understanding. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Firby J.R. (1989) Adaptive Execution in Complex Dynamic Worlds. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Yale UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Georgeff M.P., Lansky A.L. (1987) Reactive reasoning and planning. In: Proc. of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, July 1987.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Loyall A.B., Bates J. (1993) Real-time control of animated broad agents. In: Proc. of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loyall A.B. (1996) Believable Agents. PhD thesis, Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Also available as a CMU technical reportGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Bryan Loyall
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburgh

Personalised recommendations