Abstract
Agents in a multi-agent environment must often cooperate to achieve their objectives. In this paper an agent, B, cooperates with another agent, A, if B adopts a goal that furthers A's objectives in the environment. If agents are independent and motivated by their own interests, cooperation cannot be relied upon and it may be necessary for A to persuade B to adopt a cooperative goal. This paper is concerned with the organisation and construction of persuasive argument, and examines how a rational agent comes to hold a belief, and thus, how new beliefs might be engendered and existing beliefs altered, through the process of argumentation. Argument represents an opportunity for an agent to convince a possibly sceptical or resistant audience of the veracity of its own beliefs. This ability is a vital component of rich communication, facilitating explanation, instruction, cooperation and conflict resolution. An architecture is described in which a hierarchical planner is used to develop discourse plans which can be realised in natural language using the LOLITA system. Planning is concerned with the intentional, contextual and pragmatic aspects of discourse structure as well as with the logical form of the argument and its stylistic organisation. In this paper attention is restricted to the planning of persuasive discourse, or monologue.
This work has been partly funded by EPSRC grant no. 94313824.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ackermann, R.J. Belief and Knowledge, Anchor, New York (1972)
Baccus F. & Yang Q. The expected value of hierarchical problem-solving, in Proceedings of the National Conference on Artifical Intelligence (1992)
Blair, H. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, Charles Daly, London (1838)
Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J. “Rational Interaction as the Basis for Communication” in Cohen, P.R., Morgan, J., Pollack, M.E., (eds), Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, Boston (1990) 221–255
Fox, M. & Long, D.P. “Hierarchical Planning using Abstraction”, IEE Proc on Control Theory and Applications 142 (3) (1995) 197–210
Freese, J.H. (trans), Aristotle The Art of Rhetoric, Heinmann, London (1926)
Galliers, J.R. “Autonomous belief revision and communication” in Gardenfors, P., (ed), Belief Revision, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992) 220–246
Grosz, B., Sidner, C.L “Plans for Discourse” in Cohen, P.R., Morgan, J. & Pollack, M.E., (eds), Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, Boston (1990) 418–444
Hovy, E. H. “Automated Discourse Generation Using Discourse Structure Relations”, Artificial Intelligence 63 (1993) 341–385
Long, D., Garigliano, R. Reasoning by Analogy and Causality: A Model and Application, Ellis Horwood (1994)
Mann, W.C., Thompson, S.A. “Rhetorical structure theory: description and construction of text structures” in Kempen, G., Natural Language Generation: New Results in AI, Psychology and Linguistics, Kluwer (1986) 279–300
Moore, J.D., Paris, C.L. “Planning Text for Advisory Dialogues: Capturing Intentional and Rhetorical Information”, Computational Linguistics 19 (4) (1994) 651–694
Popper, K.R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson Education (1959)
Reed, C.A., Long, D.P. & Fox, M. “An Architecture for Argumentative Dialogue Planning”, in Gabbay, D. & Ohlbach, H.J. Practical Reasoning, Lecture Notes in AI Vol. 1085, Springer Verlag (1996) 555–566
Sacerdoti, E.D. A structure for plans and behaviour, Elsevier, North Holland (1977)
[16]Sandell, R. Linguistic Style and Persuasion, Academic Press, London (1977)
Shiu, S., Luo, Z., Garigliano, R. “A type theoretic semantics for SemNet”, in Gabbay, D. & Ohlbach, H.J. Practical Reasoning, Lecture Notes in AI Vol. 1085, Springer Verlag (1996) 582–595
Smith, M.H., Garigliano, R., Morgan, R.C. “Generation in the LOLITA system: An engineering approach” in Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Kennebunkport, Maine (1994)
Smith, M.H. Natural Language Generation in LOLITA, PhD Thesis, Durham University (1996)
Sycara, K. “Argumentation: Planning Other Agent's Plans” in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1989) 517-523
Tate, A. Project planning using a hierarchic non-linear planner, Technical Report, Department of Artifical Intelligence, University of Edinburgh (1976)
Vreeswijk, G. “IACAS: an implementation of Chisolm's Principles of Knowledge”, Proceedings of the 2nd Dutch/German Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Utrecht, Witteveen, C. et al. (eds) (1995) 225–234
Whately, R. Logic, Richard Griffin, London (1855)
Wilkins D. Practical planning: Extending the classical AI paradigm, Addison-Wesley (1988)
Wilson, B.A. The Anatomy of Argument, University Press of America, Washington (1980)
Young, R.M., Moore, J.D. “DPOCL: A principled approach to discourse planning” in Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Kennebunkport, Maine (1994) 13-20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Reed, C., Longe, D., Fox, M., Garagnani, M. (1997). Peruasion as a form of inter-agent negotiation. In: Zhang, C., Lukose, D. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems Methodologies and Applications. DAI 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1286. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0030086
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0030086
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63412-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69540-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive