Plausible inference for default conditionals

  • Emil Weydert
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 747)


Default Logic Boolean Combination Nonmonotonic Reasoning Default Reasoning Entailment Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [AM 91]
    N. Asher, M. Morceau. Commonsense entailment: a modal theory of nonmonotonic reasoning. In Proceedings of the 12th IJCAI. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  2. [Bou 90]
    C. Boutilier. Conditional logics of normality as modal systems. In Proceedings of AAAI 90. Boston, MA, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. [Bou 92]
    C. Boutilier. Conditional logics fordefault reasoning and belief revision. Ph.D.thesis, technical report 92-1, Dpt. of Computer Science, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  4. [Del 88]
    J. Delgrande. An approach to default reasoning based on a first-order conditional logic: a revised report. AI, 36:63–90.Google Scholar
  5. [Gab 85]
    D. Gabbay. Theoretical foundations for nonmonotonic reasoning in expert systems. In Logics and models of concurrent systems, ed. K.R. Apt. Berlin, Springer.Google Scholar
  6. [GMP 90]
    M. Goldszmidt, P. Morris, J. Pearl. A maximum entropy approach to nonmonotonic reasoning. In Proceedings of AAAI 90. Boston, MA, 1990.Google Scholar
  7. [GoP 91]
    M.Goldszmidt, J. Pearl. On the relation between rational closure and system Z. In The Third International Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, South Lake Tahoe.Google Scholar
  8. [GeP 92]
    H. Geffner, J. Pearl. Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 53: 209–244, 1992.Google Scholar
  9. [KLM 90]
    S. Kraus, D. Lehmann, M. Magidor. Nonmonotonic reasoning preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence, 44: 167–207, 1990.Google Scholar
  10. [LM 92]
    D. Lehmann, M. Magidor. What does a conditional knowledge base entail ? Artificial Intelligence, 55: 1–60, 1992.Google Scholar
  11. [Leh 92]
    D. Lehmann. Another perspective on default reasoning. Technical report TR 92-12, Department of Computer Science, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  12. [Lew 73]
    D.K. Lewis. Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. [Mak 89]
    D. Makinson. General theory of cumulative inference. In Proc. of the 2nd international workshop on nonmonotonic reasoning, eds. M. Reinfrank et al. Berlin, Springer.Google Scholar
  14. [Mak 93]
    D. Makinson. General patterns in nonmonotonic reasoning. In Handbook of Logic in Artificial intelligence and Logic Programming (vol II), eds. D.Gabbay, C. Hogger. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. [Sho 87]
    Y. Shoham. A semantical approach to non-monotonic logics. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Logics in Computer Science, 275–279, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  16. [Wey 91]
    E. Weydert. Qualitative magnitude reasoning. Towards a new syntax and semantics for default reasoning. In Nonmonotonic and Inductive Logics, eds. Dix, Jantke, Schmitt. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. [Wey 91a]
    E. Weydert. Elementary Hyperentailment. Nonmonotonic reasoning about defaults. In Proceedings of the ECSQAU 91, eds. Kruse, Siegel. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. [Wey 93]
    E. Weydert. Hyperrational conditionals. In Proceedings of the European Workshop on Theoretical Foundations of Knowledge representation and Reasoning, ECAI 92, eds. Lakemeyer, Nebel. Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emil Weydert
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institute for Computer ScienceSaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations