Abstract
Dempster's rule of combination, the main inference mechanism of the Dempster-Shafer theory of belief functions [Shafer 76; Smets 88], requires that the belief functions to be combined must be "independent". This independence assumption is usually understood to be composed of two parts: (1) the uniqueness assumption, which states that each belief function to be combined is based on a unique body of evidence, and (2) the evidential independence (or distinctness) assumption, which states that we must be able to argue about the independence of all these different bodies of evidence. In this paper, we suggest that the uniqueness assumption is not necessary, and that it should be alright if we can come up with "independent specifications" of beliefs.
This work was supported in part by the DRUMS project funded by the Commission of the European Communities under the ESPRIT II-Program, Basic Research Project 3085.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (1986). The principle of minimum specificity as a basis for evidential reasoning. In Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (Bouchon and Yager eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 75–84.
Hsia, Y.-T. and Shenoy, P. P. (1989). An evidential language for expert systems. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Methodology for Intelligent Systems, Charlotte, N.C., 9–16.
Kong, A. (1986). Multivariate belief functions and graphical models. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Statistics, Harvard University.
Pearl, J. (1986). Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks. Artificial Intelligence, 29, 241–288.
Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, California.
Shafer, G. (1976). A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press.
Shafer, G., Shenoy, P., and Mellouli, K. (1987). "Propagating belief functions in Qualitative Markov Trees", International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1, 4, 349–400.
Smets, P. (1978). Un modèle mathématico-statistique simulant le processus du diagnostic médical. Doctoral dissertation, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles.
Smets, P. (1988). Belief functions. In Non-Standard Logics for Automated Reasoning (P. Smets, E. H. Mamdani, D. Dubois and H. Prade eds.). Academic Press, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hsia, YT. (1991). Assessing multiple beliefs according to one body of evidence — Why it may be necessary, and how we might do it correctly. In: Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R., Zadeh, L.A. (eds) Uncertainty in Knowledge Bases. IPMU 1990. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 521. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0028150
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0028150
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54346-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47580-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive