Skip to main content

C. S. Peirce and the quest for gamma graphs

  • Formal Reasoning
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Structures: Fulfilling Peirce's Dream (ICCS 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1257))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper deals with some aspects of the history of C. S. Peirce's Existential Graphs. In his construction of this graphical method during 1896–1897 Peirce was motivated by some interesting considerations regarding diagrammatical reasoning. In the present paper this motivation will be briefly discussed. Whereas Peirce managed to bring the graphical systems of Alpha and Beta Graphs to a high degree of perfection, his treatment of the Gamma Graphs remained tentative and unfinished. Some of his suggestions can also be shown to be mistaken. It is, however, clear that Peirce with his Gamma Graphs was aiming at a complicated system in which one can deal with a number of interesting problems regarding various kinds of modality. Peirce, himself, was well aware of the shortcomings of his treatment of the Gamma Graphs, and he mainly concentrated on the formulation of a Gamma agenda for his followers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allwein, G. and Barwise, J. (ed.), Logical Reasoning with Diagrams, Oxford University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berg, Harmen van den,“Modal Logic for Conceptual Graphs”, in Mineau, Guy W.; Moulin, Bernard; Sowa, John (editors), Conceptual Graphs for Knowledge RepresentationConceptual Graphs for Knowledge Representation, Springer-Verlag 1993, pp.411–429.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burch, R. W., “Game-Theoretical Semantics for Peirce's Existential Graphs”, Synthese 99: 361–375, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hammer, Eric, “Peirce on Logical Diagrams”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Fall, 1995, Vol. XXXI, No. 4, 1995, pp. 807–827.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heaton, J.E., Goal Driven Theorem Proving Using Conceptual Graphs and Peirce Logic, Ph.D. Thesis, Loughborough University, UK, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keeler, M., “The Philosophical Context of Peirce's Existential Graphs”, Proceedings of the International Conceptual Structures Conference, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1995, pp. 150–165.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keeler, M. & Kloesel, C., “Communication, Semiotic Continuity, and the Margins of the Peircean Text”, in Margins of the Text, edited by David C. Greetham, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996 (Can be obtained from http://accord.iupui.edu/accord/margins.txt).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kevelson, Roberta, Charles S. Peirce's Method of Methods, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kocura, P., “Conceptual Graph Canonicity and Semantic Constraints”, in Eklund, P., Ellis, G., Mann, G. (ed.), Conceptual Structures: Knowledge Representation as Interlingua, Auxiliary Proceedings, 1996, p.133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peirce, C.S., Reasoning and the Logic of Things, (edited by Kenneth Laine Ketner), Harvard University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peirce, C.S., Collected Papers, 8 volumes (eds. P. Weiss, A. Burks, C. Hartshorne), Cambridge: Harward University Press (CP). 1931–1958.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peirce, C.S., Application to the Carnegie Institution, July 15, 1902, Manuscript L75, Analytical reconstruction and editorial work by Joseph Ransdell, Indiana University, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts, Don D., The Existential Graphs of Charles S. Peirce, Mouton, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts, Don. D., “The Existential Graphs”, Computers Math Applic. Vol. 23 (1992), No. 6–9, 1992, pp. 639–663

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sun-Joo Shin, “Peirce and the Logical Status of Digrams”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 15, 1994, pp. 45–58

    Google Scholar 

  16. Øhrstrøm, P., van den Berg, H., Schmidt, J., “Some Peircean Problems Regarding Graphs for Time and Modality”, Second International Conference on Conceptual Structures, University of Maryland, 1994, p.78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Øhrstrøm, P. & Hasle, P.E.V., Temporal Logic. From Ancient Ideas to Artificial Intelligence, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 57, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Øhrstrøm, P., “Existential Graphs and Tense Logic”, in Eklund, P., Ellis, G., Mann, G. (ed.), Conceptual Structures: Knowledge Representation as Interlingua, Springer-Verlag, 1996, p.203–217.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Dickson Lukose Harry Delugach Mary Keeler Leroy Searle John Sowa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Øhrstrøm, P. (1997). C. S. Peirce and the quest for gamma graphs. In: Lukose, D., Delugach, H., Keeler, M., Searle, L., Sowa, J. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Fulfilling Peirce's Dream. ICCS 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1257. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027883

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027883

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63308-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69424-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics