Advertisement

Introduction of viewpoints in conceptual graph formalism

  • Myriam Ribière
  • Rose Dieng
Knowledge Representation
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1257)

Abstract

To represent knowledge in a context of several experts, it is interesting to model the multiple perspectives that different experts may have on the objects handled in their reasoning. The concept of a particular perspective called viewpoint, is already used in the field of object oriented representation or in the field of databases conception. Taking inspiration of research made in object oriented representation, we propose in this paper an extension of the conceptual graph formalism to integrate viewpoints in the support and in the building of conceptual graphs. We also study mechanisms for managing viewpoints.

Keywords

Knowledge Representation Conceptual Graphs Viewpoints 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D.G. Bobrow, T. Winograd, An overview of KRL, a Knowledge Representation Language, Cognitive Science, vol. 1 n°.1, p. 3–45, 1977.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Carré, L. Dekker and J-M. Geib. Multiple and Evolutive Representation in the ROME Language. Towards an integrated Corporate Information System. In Proc. TOOLS' 90, Paris, 26–29 June 1990.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Dekker and B. Carré. Multiple and Dynamic Representation of frames with Points of View in FROME. In Proc. RPO'92. La Grande Motte, France, 22–23 June, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Delugach, Specifying Multiple-Viewed Software Requirements With Conceptual Graphs, Jour. Systems and Software, vol. 19, p. 207–224, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Ellis, Object-Oriented Conceptuals Graphs, In Ellis et al eds, Conceptual Structures: Applications, Implementation and Theory. Proc. of ICCS'95. Springer Verlag. Santa Cruz, CA, USA, Aug. 1995, p. 144–172.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Esch, Contexts, Canons and Coreferent Types. In Terpfenhart &al eds, Conceptual Structures: Current Practices: Proc. of the ICCS'94. College Park, Maryland, USA, August 1994, Springer Verlag, LNAI n. 835, p. 185–195.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    O. Marino, F. Rechenmann, P. Uvietta, Multiple perspectives and classification mechanism in Object-oriented Representation, Proc. 9th ECAI, Stockholm, Sweden, p. 425–430, Pitman Publishing, London, August 1990.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Martin, Exploitation de graphes conceptuels et de documents structurés et hypertextes pour l'acquisition de connaissances et la recherche d'information, PhD Thesis, University of Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, October 1996.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Minsky, A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in The psychology of Computer Vision, McGrawHill, New York, P.H. Winston (ed), Chap. 6, p. 156–189, 1975.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G.T. Nguyen, D. Rieu, J. Escamilla, An Object Model for Engineering Design, in Proc. of ECOOP'92, Utrecht, The Netherlands, June/July 1992, Springer-Verlag, p. 232–251.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Ribière, R. Dieng, M. Blay-Fornarino, A-M. Pinna-Dery, Link-based Reasoning on Conceptual Graphs, in Suppl. Proceedings of ICCS'96, Sydney, Australia, August 1996, p 146–160.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Stefik, D.G. Bobrow, Object-Oriented Programming: Theme and Variations. The A.I. Magazine, vol. 6, n° 4, p 40–62, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. F. Sowa. Conceptual Structures, Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Reading, Addison-Wesley, 1984.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. F. Sowa. Relating Diagrams to Logic. In Mineau & al eds, Conceptual Graphs for Knowledge Representation: Proc. of ICCS'93. Springer Verlag, LNAI n. 699. Quebec City, Canada, August 1993, p. 1–35.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Wermelinger. Conceptual Structures and First-Order Logic. In Ellis et al eds, Conceptual Structures: Applications, Implementation and Theory. Proc. of ICCS'95. Springer Verlag. Santa Cruz, CA, USA, Aug. 1995, p. 323–337.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Myriam Ribière
    • 1
  • Rose Dieng
    • 1
  1. 1.INRIA (project ACACIA)Sophia-Antipolis Cedex

Personalised recommendations