Skip to main content

Information requirements for software performance engineering

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 977))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Baldassari, B. Bruno, V. Russi, and R. Zompi, “PROTOB: A Hierarchical Object-Oriented CASE Tool for Distributed Systems,” Proceedings of the European Software Engineering Conference, 1989, Coventry, England, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Booch, Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications, Redwood City, CA, Benjamin/Cummings, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. J. A. Buhr, G. M. Karam, C. J. Hayes, and C. M. Woodside, “Software CAD: A Revolutionary Approach,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 235–249, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. EIA, “CDIF — CASE Data Interchange Format Overview,” EIA/IS-106, Electronics Industries Association, January, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Hsia, J. Samuel, J. Gao, D. Kung, Y. Toyoshima, and C. Chen, “Formal Approach to Scenario Analysis,” IEEE Software, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 33–41, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. S. Jaffe, N. G. Leveson, M. P. E. Heimdahl, and B. E. Melhart, “Software Requirements Analysis for Real-Time Process Control Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 241–258, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Jahanian and A. K.-L. Mok, “A Graph-Theoretic Approach for Timing Analysis and its Implementation,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. C-36, no. 8, pp. 961–975, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Lor and D. M. Berry, “Automatic Synthesis of SARA Design Models from System Requirements,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1229–1240, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. R. Martin, “An Integrated Software Performance Engineering Environment,” Masters Thesis, Duke University, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Opdahl, “A CASE Tool for Performance Engineering During Software Design,” Proceedings of the Fifth Nordic Workshop on Programming Environmental Research, Tampere, Finland, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Opdahl and A. SØlvberg, “Conceptual Integration of Information System and Performance Modeling,” Proceedings of the Working Conference on Information System Concepts: Improving the Understanding, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Potts, K. Takahashi, and A. I. Anton, “Inquiry-Based Requirements Analysis,” IEEE Software, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 21–32, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. A. Rolia, “Predicting the Performance of Software Systems,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Rumbaugh, M. Blaha, W. Premerlani, F. Eddy, and W. Lorensen, Object-Oriented Modeling and Design, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. Shen, C. Richter, M. Graf, and J. Brumfield, “VERDI: A Visual Environment for Designing Distributed Systems,” Technical Report No. STP-054-90, Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation, January, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. U. Smith, “Definition Of A Performance Model Interchange Format,” Performance Engineering Services, October, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. U. Smith, Performance Engineering of Software Systems, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. U. Smith and L. G. Williams, “Why CASE Should Extend into Software Performance,” Software Magazine, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 49–65, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. U. Smith and B. Wong, “SPE Evaluation of a Client/Server Application,” Proceedings of the Computer Measurement Group, Orlando, FL, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Valderruten, O. Hijiej, A. Benzekri, and D. Gazal, “Deriving Queueing Networks Performance Models from Annotated LOTOS Specifications,” Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Modelling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation, R. Pooley and J. Hillston, ed., Edinburgh, 1992, pp. 167–178.

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. G. Williams, “Definition of Information Requirements for Software Performance Engineering,” Technical Report No. SERM-021-94, Software Engineering Research, October, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. M. Woodside, “Throughput Calculation for Basic Stochastic Rendezvous Networks,” Performance Evaluation, vol. 9, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. M. Woodside, E. M. Hagos, E. Neron, and R. J. A. Buhr, “The CAEDE Performance Analysis Tool,” Ada Letters, vol. XI, no. 3, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Heinz Beilner Falko Bause

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Williams, L.G., Smith, C.U. (1995). Information requirements for software performance engineering. In: Beilner, H., Bause, F. (eds) Quantitative Evaluation of Computing and Communication Systems. TOOLS 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 977. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0024309

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0024309

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60300-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44789-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics