Skip to main content

Set theoretic foundations for fuzzy set theory, and their applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logical Foundations of Computer Science — Tver '92 (LFCS 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 620))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 157 Accesses

Abstract

The search for foundations for fuzzy set theory that are both mathematically elegant and general enough to encompass the practical applications of fuzzy sets has been a long process. Currently the most well-known formalisms are those based on category theory [3]. These category-theoretic formulations, in terms of quasi-topoi [4], are quite complex however, and may be difficult to use for those without expertise in category theory. In contrast, the more pragmatic approach of [11] leads to strong restrictions on the semantics that can be used, essentially requiring that formulae are always evaluated by using the Lukasiewicz valuation. This paper presents the results of work which has provided a simple, set-theoretic basis for the foundations of fuzzy sets. This is achieved by the use of residuated logic, which generalises intuitionistic predicate logic, and it encompasses a wide range of common semantic valuations for fuzzy logic. A set theory is built on top of this underlying logic, using the method of [6] to build a cumulative hierarchy of fuzzy sets. There is an interpretation of classical set theory into the resulting theory.

We give examples of applications of this theory to constraint-based reasoning, to the integration of probabilistic and possibilistic reasoning, and to proximity-based classification. Issues of the psychological credibility of fuzzy sets will also be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Halpern J.Y., An Analysis of First-Order Logics of Probability, Artificial Intel-ligence 46 (1990), pp. 311–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harrington L.A., (Ed.), Harvey Friedman's Research on the Foundations of Mathematics, Studies in Logic Vol. 117 (North-Holland 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Höhle U., Stout L.N., Foundations of Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 40 (1991), pp. 257–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldblatt R., Topoi: The Categorial Analysis of Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Greyson R., Heyting valued models for Intuitionistic Set Theory, Applications of Sheaves, Lecture Notes in Mathematics Vol. 753, Springer-Verlag 1979, pp 402–414.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lano K., Intuitionistic Modal Logic and Set Theory, Journal of Symbolic Logic, Vol 56, No 2, June 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lano K., A Constraint-Based Fuzzy Inference System, EPIA '91, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Vol 541, Barahona P., Porto A., Pereira L., (Eds), Springer-Verlag 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lano K., Mathematical Frameworks for Vagueness and Approximate Reasoning, PhD Thesis, Bristol University, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lano K., Combining Object-Oriented Representations of Concepts with Proximity to Conceptual Prototypes, Proceedings of IEEE CompEuro '92 Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Monk D., Mathematical Logic, North Holland, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Novák V., Pedrycz W., Fuzzy Sets and t-norms in the light of Fuzzy Logic, in Machine Learning and Uncertain Reasoning, Gains B., Boose J., (Eds), Vol. 3 of series in Knowledge-Based Systems, Academic Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paris J.B., Vencovska A., On the Applicability of Maximum Entropy to Inexact Reasoning, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning Vol 3, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Porter B. W., Bareiss R., Holte R. C., Concept Learning and Heuristic Classification in Weak-Theory Domains, Artificial Intelligence 45 (1990) 229–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pultr A., Fuzziness and Fuzzy Equality, Aspects Of Vagueness, Ed H.Skala, S.Termini, E.Trillas, (D.Reidel 1984) pp 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shostak R., The Sup-Inf method for Proving Pressburger Formulae, JACM Vol. 24, No. 4, October 1977, pp 529–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tonn B.E., Goeltz R.T., Psychological Validity of Uncertainty Combining Rules in Expert Systems, Expert Systems, May 1990, Vol 7, No 2, pp. 94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Jinwen, Fuzzy Set Structure with Strong Implication, in H.Wang (Ed.), Advances in Fuzzy Sets, Possibility Theory and Applications, (Plenum Press, 1983) pp 107–136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Anil Nerode Mikhail Taitslin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lano, K. (1992). Set theoretic foundations for fuzzy set theory, and their applications. In: Nerode, A., Taitslin, M. (eds) Logical Foundations of Computer Science — Tver '92. LFCS 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 620. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0023880

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0023880

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55707-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47276-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics