Skip to main content

Efficient constructions of Hitting Sets for systems of linear functions

  • Complexity Theory II
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
STACS 97 (STACS 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1200))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Given a positive number δ ∈ (0,1), a subset H ⊑ {0,1}n is a δ-Hitting Set for a class R of boolean functions with n inputs if, for any function fR such that Pr (f=1)≥δ, there exists an element h ∈ H such that f(h)=1. Our paper presents a new deterministic method to efficiently construct δ-Hitting Set for the class of systems (i.e. logical conjunctions) of boolean linear functions. Systems of boolean linear functions can be considered as the algebraic generalization of boolean combinatorial rectangular functions, the only significative example for which an efficient deterministic construction of Hitting Sets were previously known. In the restricted case of boolean rectangular functions, our method (even though completely different) achieves equivalent results to those obtained in [11]. Our results also gives an upper bound on the minimum cardinality of solution covers for the class of systems of linear equations defined over a finite field. Furthermore, as preliminary result, we show a new upper bound on the circuit complexity of integer monotone functions generalizing previous results obtained in [12].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andreev A.E., Clementi A.E.F. and Rolim J.D.P. (1996), “Towards efficient constructions of hitting sets that derandomize BPP”, Research Report in ECCC, TR-96-029.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allender E, Beals R, and Ogihara M. (1996), “The complexity of matrix rank and feasible systems of linear equations”, in Proc. of 28-th ACM STOC, to appear. Also available by ftp/www in ECCC (Tech. Rep. 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andreev, A.E. (1989), On the complexity of the realization of partial Boolean functions by circuits of functional elements, Diskret. mat. 1, pp.36–45. (In Russian). English translation in Discrete Mathematics and Applications 1, pp.251–262.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andreev A.E., Clementi A.E.F. and Rolim J.D.P. (1996), “Hitting Sets derandomize BPP”, in Proc. of 23-th ICALP LNCS, Springer-Verlag, to appear. Also available by ftp/www in ECCC (Tech. Rep. 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andreev A.E., Clementi A.E.F. and Rolim J.D.P. (1996), “Optimal bounds for the approximation of boolean functions and some applications”, in Proc. of 13-th STACS, LNCS, Springer-Verlag (1996). Also available by ftp/www in ECCC (Tech. Rep. 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andreev A.E., Clementi A.E.F. and Rolim J.D.P. (1996), “On the parallel computation of boolean functions on unrelated inputs”, in Proc. of 4-th Israeli Symposium on Theory of Computing and Systems (ISTCS'96), to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chor B., and O. Goldreich (1989), “On the Power of Two-Point Based Sampling”, J. Complexity, 5, 96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Furedi, Z. (1988) “Matchings and Covers in Hypergraphs”, Graphs and Combinatorics, 4, 115–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karp R., Pippenger N., and Sipser M. (1982) “Time-Randomness, Tradeoff”, presented at AMS Conference on Probabilistic Computational Complexity.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karpinski, M., and Luby, M. (1993), “Approximating the number of solutions to a GF(2) Formula”, J. Algorithms, 14, pp.280–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Linial N., Luby M., Saks M., and Zuckerman D. (1993), “Efficient construction of a small hitting set for combinatorial rectangles in high dimension”, in Proc. 25th ACM STOC, 258–267.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lupanov, O.B. (1965), “About a method circuits design — local coding principle”, Problemy Kibernet. 14, pp.31–110. (in Russian). Systems Theory Res. v.14, 1966 (in English).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nechiporuk, E.I. (1965), About the complexity of gating circuits for the partial boolean matrix, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 163, pp.40–42. (In Russian). English translation in Soviet Math. Docl.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nisan N., and Wigderson A. (1994), “Hardness vs Randomness”, J. Comput. System Sci. 49, 149–167 (also presented at the 29th IEEE FOCS, 1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sipser M. (1986), “Expanders, Randomness or Time vs Space”, in Proc. of 1st Conference on Structures in Complexity Theory, LNCS 223, 325–329.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Rüdiger Reischuk Michel Morvan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Andreev, A.E., Clementi, A.E.F., Rolim, J.D.P. (1997). Efficient constructions of Hitting Sets for systems of linear functions. In: Reischuk, R., Morvan, M. (eds) STACS 97. STACS 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1200. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0023475

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0023475

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-62616-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68342-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics